IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v38y2020i5p763-776.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Newcomers’ reactions to unfulfilled leadership expectations: An attribution theory approach

Author

Listed:
  • Seele, Hagen
  • Eberl, Peter

Abstract

This paper examines newcomers’ reactions when facing unfulfilled leadership expectations. Although leaders are ascribed a key role in newcomers’ socialization, very little is known about newcomers’ expectations of leadership and their subsequent behaviors when these expectations are not fulfilled. Against the background of a follower-centered perspective, we develop a differentiated model of newcomers’ leadership attributions. As general attribution theory has recently shown, causal links are not always made in clear-cut ways. Thus, there may be several steps between the attribution and non-attribution of leadership. As our qualitative empirical study in Germany reveals, different unfulfilled leadership expectation types lead to equally different leadership attribution levels, with various behavioral consequences for newcomers. We suggest a dynamic model, starting with investing in a relationship before newcomers choose refusing reactions such as confrontation or withdrawal.

Suggested Citation

  • Seele, Hagen & Eberl, Peter, 2020. "Newcomers’ reactions to unfulfilled leadership expectations: An attribution theory approach," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 763-776.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:38:y:2020:i:5:p:763-776
    DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2020.02.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237320300281
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.emj.2020.02.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tracy L. Dumas & Katherine W. Phillips & Nancy P. Rothbard, 2013. "Getting Closer at the Company Party: Integration Experiences, Racial Dissimilarity, and Workplace Relationships," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1377-1401, October.
    2. Steven L. Grover & Markus Hasel & Caroline Manville & Carolina Serrano-Archimi, 2014. "Follower reactions to leader trust violations : A grounded theory of violation types, likelihood of recovery, and recovery process," Post-Print hal-02313149, HAL.
    3. Ambrose, Maureen L., 2002. "Contemporary justice research: A new look at familiar questions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 803-812, September.
    4. Okimoto, Tyler G. & Wenzel, Michael, 2014. "Bridging Diverging Perspectives and Repairing Damaged Relationships in the Aftermath of Workplace Transgressions," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(3), pages 443-473, July.
    5. Steven Grover & Markus Hasel & Caroline Manville & Carolina Serrano-Archimi, 2014. "Follower reactions to leader trust violations: A grounded theory of violation types, likelihood of recovery, and recovery process," Post-Print hal-01796413, HAL.
    6. Michael Palanski, 2012. "Forgiveness and Reconciliation in the Workplace: A Multi-Level Perspective and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(3), pages 275-287, September.
    7. Ans De Vos, 2005. "The psychological contract of organisational newcomers: an investigation of antecedents and changes over time," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(4), pages 371-388.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steven L. Grover & Marie-Aude Abid-Dupont & Caroline Manville & Markus C. Hasel, 2019. "Repairing Broken Trust Between Leaders and Followers: How Violation Characteristics Temper Apologies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 853-870, March.
    2. Brühl, Rolf & Basel, Jörn S. & Kury, Max F., 2018. "Communication after an integrity-based trust violation: How organizational account giving affects trust," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 161-170.
    3. Nina Tomaževič & Aleksander Aristovnik, 2019. "Factors of Trust in Immediate Leaders: An Empirical Study in Police Service Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Kähkönen, T. & Blomqvist, K. & Gillespie, N. & Vanhala, M., 2021. "Employee trust repair: A systematic review of 20 years of empirical research and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 98-109.
    5. Hommelhoff, Sabine & Richter, David, 2017. "Refuting the cliché of the distrustful manager," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 164-173.
    6. Kroeger, Frens, 2015. "The development, escalation and collapse of system trust: From the financial crisis to society at large," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 431-437.
    7. Gölgeci, Ismail & Murphy, William H. & Johnston, David A., 2018. "Power-based behaviors in supply chains and their effects on relational satisfaction: A fresh perspective and directions for research," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 278-287.
    8. Hartner-Tiefenthaler, Martina, 2021. "Supervisors’ power to deal with employees’ inner resignation: How perceived power of the organization and the supervisor relate to employees’ voluntary and enforced work behavior," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 260-269.
    9. Guglielmo Faldetta, 2022. "Forgiving the Unforgivable: The Possibility of the ‘Unconditional’ Forgiveness in the Workplace," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 91-103, September.
    10. Turel, Ofir & Connelly, Catherine E., 2013. "Too busy to help: Antecedents and outcomes of interactional justice in web-based service encounters," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 674-683.
    11. Giurge, Laura M. & Bohns, Vanessa K., 2021. "You don’t need to answer right away! Receivers overestimate how quickly senders expect responses to non-urgent work emails," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 114-128.
    12. Pai, Jieun & DeVoe, Sanford E. & Pfeffer, Jeffrey, 2020. "How income and the economic evaluation of time affect who we socialize with outside of work," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 158-175.
    13. Beine, Michel & Peracchi, Silvia & Zanaj, Skerdilajda, 2023. "Ancestral diversity and performance: Evidence from football data," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 193-214.
    14. Franziska Zuber, 2015. "Spread of Unethical Behavior in Organizations: A Dynamic Social Network Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 151-172, September.
    15. Dr. Padmakumar Ram & Dr. Gantasala V. Prabhakar, 2011. "An enquiry into the mediatory role of employee engagement: Evidence from the hotel industry in Jordan," Far East Journal of Psychology and Business, Far East Research Centre, vol. 5(5), pages 41-59, November.
    16. Andrew M. Carton & Basima A. Tewfik, 2016. "Perspective—A New Look at Conflict Management in Work Groups," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1125-1141, October.
    17. Bailey, Wendy J. & Sawers, Kimberly M., 2018. "Moving toward a principle-based approach to U.S. accounting standard setting: A demand for procedural justice and accounting reform," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1-13.
    18. Manthos D. Delis & Chrysovalantis Gaganis & Iftekhar Hasan & Fotios Pasiouras, 2017. "The Effect of Board Directors from Countries with Different Genetic Diversity Levels on Corporate Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 231-249, January.
    19. Laura Little & Amanda Hinojosa & John Lynch, 2017. "Make Them Feel: How the Disclosure of Pregnancy to a Supervisor Leads to Changes in Perceived Supervisor Support," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 618-635, August.
    20. Ali Nasr Esfahani & Mehdi Abzari & Shahzad Dezianian, 2014. "Analyzing the Effect of Performance Appraisal Errors on Perceived Organizational Justice," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 4(1), pages 36-40, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:38:y:2020:i:5:p:763-776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.