Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

A mixed methods evaluation of televised health promotion advertisements targeted at older adults

Contents:

Author Info

  • Berry, Tanya R.
  • Spence, John C.
  • Plotnikoff, Ronald C.
  • Bauman, Adrian
  • McCargar, Linda
  • Witcher, Chad
  • Clark, Marianne
  • Stolp, Sean
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The purpose of this research was to evaluate television advertisements targeted at 55-70-year olds that promoted physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption. Awareness of the campaign, perceived credibility of the source, intentions to visit a promoted website, and intentions to perform the healthy behaviors were evaluated using mixed methods research. Results from a population level survey (n = 1600) showed low unprompted and prompted awareness of the campaign and no differences in intentions or behaviors among those who were aware of the campaign. Unprompted recall resulted in a very wide range of responses including the citation of many commercial advertisers. Qualitative themes that emerged from the focus groups included neutral, positive, and negative comments about the advertisements, source credibility, website considerations specific to seniors, and suggestions about appropriate advertising for older adults. This research showed that the increased attention paid to the advertisements was due in a large part to negative reactions to the character used in the advertisements. Another important finding was the government was not considered to be a credible source of health information. Finally, health promoters should be cautious about websites as the primary source of information, particularly for older adults.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V7V-4W9XDWF-1/2/3360acbb821202681bdbdfad102b289e
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Evaluation and Program Planning.

    Volume (Year): 32 (2009)
    Issue (Month): 3 (August)
    Pages: 278-288

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:32:y:2009:i:3:p:278-288

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan

    Related research

    Keywords: Television advertisements Older adults Survey Focus groups;

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Bauman, Adrian & Smith, Ben J. & Maibach, Edward W. & Reger-Nash, Bill, 2006. "Evaluation of mass media campaigns for physical activity," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 312-322, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as in new window

    Cited by:
    1. Costa, António Firmino da & Pegado, Elsa & Ávila, Patrícia & Coelho, Ana Rita, 2013. "Mixed-methods evaluation in complex programmes: The national reading plan in Portugal," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1-9.

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:32:y:2009:i:3:p:278-288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.