IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v36y2011i11p6420-6432.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A modified shuffle frog leaping algorithm for multi-objective optimal power flow

Author

Listed:
  • Niknam, Taher
  • Narimani, Mohammad rasoul
  • Jabbari, Masoud
  • Malekpour, Ahmad Reza

Abstract

This paper presents an efficient and reliable evolutionary-based approach to solve the Optimal Power Flow (OPF) problem by considering the emission issue. The OPF problem has been widely used in power system operation and planning for determining electricity prices. Therefore, the conventional optimal power flow cannot meet the environmental protection requirements, because it only considers generation cost minimization. The multi-objective optimal power flow considers economical and emission issues. By adding the emission objective in the optimal power flow problem, this problem become more complicated than before and it needs to be solved with an accurate algorithm. This paper proposes an algorithm based on the Shuffle Frog Leaping Algorithm (SLFA) to solve the multi-objective OPF problem. Furthermore, this paper presents a modified SLFA called MSLFA algorithm which profits from a mutation in order to reduce the processing time and improve the quality of solutions, particularly to avoid being trapped in local optima. The IEEE 30-bus test system is presented to illustrate the application of the proposed problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Niknam, Taher & Narimani, Mohammad rasoul & Jabbari, Masoud & Malekpour, Ahmad Reza, 2011. "A modified shuffle frog leaping algorithm for multi-objective optimal power flow," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6420-6432.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:36:y:2011:i:11:p:6420-6432
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.09.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544211006244
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2011.09.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sadegheih, A., 2009. "Optimization of network planning by the novel hybrid algorithms of intelligent optimization techniques," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1539-1551.
    2. Lin, Q.G. & Huang, G.H., 2009. "Planning of energy system management and GHG-emission control in the Municipality of Beijing--An inexact-dynamic stochastic programming model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 4463-4473, November.
    3. Lin, Q.G. & Huang, G.H., 2010. "An inexact two-stage stochastic energy systems planning model for managing greenhouse gas emission at a municipal level," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2270-2280.
    4. Toffolo, A. & Lazzaretto, A., 2002. "Evolutionary algorithms for multi-objective energetic and economic optimization in thermal system design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 549-567.
    5. Al-Muhawesh, Tareq A. & Qamber, Isa S., 2008. "The established mega watt linear programming-based optimal power flow model applied to the real power 56-bus system in eastern province of Saudi Arabia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 12-21.
    6. Niknam, Taher & Mojarrad, Hassan Doagou & Nayeripour, Majid, 2010. "A new fuzzy adaptive particle swarm optimization for non-smooth economic dispatch," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1764-1778.
    7. Vaisakh, K. & Srinivas, L.R., 2010. "A genetic evolving ant direction DE for OPF with non-smooth cost functions and statistical analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 3155-3171.
    8. Lin, Q.G. & Huang, G.H. & Bass, B. & Qin, X.S., 2009. "IFTEM: An interval-fuzzy two-stage stochastic optimization model for regional energy systems planning under uncertainty," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 868-878, March.
    9. Q. Lin & G. Huang, 2011. "Interval-fuzzy stochastic optimization for regional energy systems planning and greenhouse-gas emission management under uncertainty—a case study for the Province of Ontario, Canada," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 104(2), pages 353-378, January.
    10. Vahidinasab, V. & Jadid, S., 2010. "Joint economic and emission dispatch in energy markets: A multiobjective mathematical programming approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1497-1504.
    11. Xie, Y.L. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Li, Y.F., 2010. "An interval fixed-mix stochastic programming method for greenhouse gas mitigation in energy systems under uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4627-4644.
    12. Li, Y.F. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Chen, X., 2010. "Energy and environmental systems planning under uncertainty--An inexact fuzzy-stochastic programming approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(10), pages 3189-3211, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, G.C. & Huang, G.H. & Lin, Q.G. & Zhang, X.D. & Tan, Q. & Chen, Y.M., 2011. "Development of a GHG-mitigation oriented inexact dynamic model for regional energy system management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3388-3398.
    2. Wang, Xingwei & Cai, Yanpeng & Chen, Jiajun & Dai, Chao, 2013. "A grey-forecasting interval-parameter mixed-integer programming approach for integrated electric-environmental management–A case study of Beijing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 334-344.
    3. Niknam, Taher & Azizipanah-Abarghooee, Rasoul & Narimani, Mohammad Rasoul, 2012. "Reserve constrained dynamic optimal power flow subject to valve-point effects, prohibited zones and multi-fuel constraints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 451-464.
    4. Kim, M.K. & Park, J.K. & Nam, Y.W., 2011. "Market-clearing for pricing system security based on voltage stability criteria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 1255-1264.
    5. Dong, C. & Huang, G.H. & Cai, Y.P. & Liu, Y., 2012. "An inexact optimization modeling approach for supporting energy systems planning and air pollution mitigation in Beijing city," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 673-688.
    6. Gaiqiang Yang & Ping Guo & Mo Li & Shiqi Fang & Liudong Zhang, 2016. "An Improved Solving Approach for Interval-Parameter Programming and Application to an Optimal Allocation of Irrigation Water Problem," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(2), pages 701-729, January.
    7. Narimani, Mohammad Rasoul & Azizipanah-Abarghooee, Rasoul & Zoghdar-Moghadam-Shahrekohne, Behrouz & Gholami, Kayvan, 2013. "A novel approach to multi-objective optimal power flow by a new hybrid optimization algorithm considering generator constraints and multi-fuel type," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 119-136.
    8. Gaiqiang Yang & Ping Guo & Mo Li & Shiqi Fang & Liudong Zhang, 2016. "An Improved Solving Approach for Interval-Parameter Programming and Application to an Optimal Allocation of Irrigation Water Problem," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(2), pages 701-729, January.
    9. Wu, Zhibin & Xu, Jiuping, 2013. "Predicting and optimization of energy consumption using system dynamics-fuzzy multiple objective programming in world heritage areas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 19-31.
    10. Pourakbari-Kasmaei, Mahdi & Rider, Marcos J. & Mantovani, José R.S., 2014. "An unequivocal normalization-based paradigm to solve dynamic economic and emission active-reactive OPF (optimal power flow)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 554-566.
    11. Yulei Xie & Linrui Wang & Guohe Huang & Dehong Xia & Ling Ji, 2018. "A Stochastic Inexact Robust Model for Regional Energy System Management and Emission Reduction Potential Analysis—A Case Study of Zibo City, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-24, August.
    12. Azizipanah-Abarghooee, Rasoul & Niknam, Taher & Roosta, Alireza & Malekpour, Ahmad Reza & Zare, Mohsen, 2012. "Probabilistic multiobjective wind-thermal economic emission dispatch based on point estimated method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 322-335.
    13. Liang, M.S. & Huang, G.H. & Chen, J.P. & Li, Y.P., 2022. "Development of non-deterministic energy-water-carbon nexus planning model: A case study of Shanghai, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    14. Zhengping Liu & Wang Zhang & Hongxian Liu & Guohe Huang & Jiliang Zhen & Xin Qi, 2019. "Characterization of Renewable Energy Utilization Mode for Air-Environmental Quality Improvement through an Inexact Factorial Optimization Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Guangxiao Hu & Xiaoming Ma & Junping Ji, 2017. "A Stochastic Optimization Model for Carbon Mitigation Path under Demand Uncertainty of the Power Sector in Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-12, October.
    16. Xie, Y.L. & Huang, G.H. & Li, W. & Ji, L., 2014. "Carbon and air pollutants constrained energy planning for clean power generation with a robust optimization model—A case study of Jining City, China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 150-167.
    17. Chen, Yizhong & Lu, Hongwei & Li, Jing & Huang, Guohe & He, Li, 2016. "Regional planning of new-energy systems within multi-period and multi-option contexts: A case study of Fengtai, Beijing, China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 356-372.
    18. Özyön, Serdar & Temurtaş, Hasan & Durmuş, Burhanettin & Kuvat, Gültekin, 2012. "Charged system search algorithm for emission constrained economic power dispatch problem," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 420-430.
    19. Zhu, Y. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H., 2013. "Planning carbon emission trading for Beijing's electric power systems under dual uncertainties," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 113-128.
    20. Wang, Yongqiang & Zhou, Jianzhong & Mo, Li & Zhang, Rui & Zhang, Yongchuan, 2012. "Short-term hydrothermal generation scheduling using differential real-coded quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 657-671.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:36:y:2011:i:11:p:6420-6432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.