IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v254y2022ipas0360544222011938.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-economic sensitivity analysis for optimization of carbon dioxide capture process by potassium carbonate solution

Author

Listed:
  • Chuenphan, Thapanat
  • Yurata, Tarabordin
  • Sema, Teerawat
  • Chalermsinsuwan, Benjapon

Abstract

In this study, a potassium carbonate (K2CO3) solution-based carbon dioxide (CO2) absorption process was efficiently improved and optimized by Aspen Plus. Sensitivity analysis with a 2k factorial design was conducted to analyze both main and interaction effects of process parameters on CO2 removal efficiency and reboiler specific heat duty. It was found that the liquid-to-gas (L/G) mass ratio and CO2 concentration in sour gas were the two most important parameters affecting both responses. Additionally, a pilot-scale CO2 capture process was simulated for both K2CO3 and monoethanolamine (MEA) solutions and compared in terms of CO2 removal efficiency, reboiler specific heat duty, and annual CO2 capture cost. The results showed that the optimal case for a K2CO3 solution achieved 87.04% CO2 removal efficiency, reboiler specific heat duty of 2.17 GJ/T CO2, annual CO2 capture cost of 57.50 USD/T CO2, and exergy efficiency of 40.71%, while the MEA solution case showed 73.35% CO2 removal efficiency, 4.78 GJ/T CO2, annual CO2 capture of 107.50 USD/T CO2, and an exergy efficiency of 18.49%.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuenphan, Thapanat & Yurata, Tarabordin & Sema, Teerawat & Chalermsinsuwan, Benjapon, 2022. "Techno-economic sensitivity analysis for optimization of carbon dioxide capture process by potassium carbonate solution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:254:y:2022:i:pa:s0360544222011938
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222011938
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124290?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Foster Kofi Ayittey & Agus Saptoro & Perumal Kumar & Mee Kee Wong, 2020. "Parametric study and optimisation of hot K2CO3‐based post‐combustion CO2 capture from a coal‐fired power plant," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(3), pages 631-642, June.
    2. Urech, Jeremy & Tock, Laurence & Harkin, Trent & Hoadley, Andrew & Maréchal, François, 2014. "An assessment of different solvent-based capture technologies within an IGCC–CCS power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 268-276.
    3. Choi, Jaeuk & Cho, Habin & Yun, Seokwon & Jang, Mun-Gi & Oh, Se-Young & Binns, Michael & Kim, Jin-Kuk, 2019. "Process design and optimization of MEA-based CO2 capture processes for non-power industries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 971-980.
    4. Oh, Se-Young & Binns, Michael & Cho, Habin & Kim, Jin-Kuk, 2016. "Energy minimization of MEA-based CO2 capture process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 353-362.
    5. Foster Kofi Ayittey & Christine Ann Obek & Agus Saptoro & Kumar Perumal & Mee Kee Wong, 2020. "Process modifications for a hot potassium carbonate‐based CO2 capture system: a comparative study," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(1), pages 130-146, February.
    6. Ferrara, G. & Lanzini, A. & Leone, P. & Ho, M.T. & Wiley, D.E., 2017. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic analysis of post-combustion CO2 capture using MEA-solvent chemical absorption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 113-128.
    7. Li, Bao-Hong & Zhang, Nan & Smith, Robin, 2016. "Simulation and analysis of CO2 capture process with aqueous monoethanolamine solution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 707-717.
    8. Duan, Liqiang & Zhao, Mingde & Yang, Yongping, 2012. "Integration and optimization study on the coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture using MEA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 107-116.
    9. Cao, Yang & He, Boshu & Ding, Guangchao & Su, Liangbin & Duan, Zhipeng, 2017. "Energy and exergy investigation on two improved IGCC power plants with different CO2 capture schemes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 47-57.
    10. Zhang, Rui & Zhang, Xiaowen & Yang, Qi & Yu, Hai & Liang, Zhiwu & Luo, Xiao, 2017. "Analysis of the reduction of energy cost by using MEA-MDEA-PZ solvent for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture (PCC)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1002-1011.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julio, Alisson Aparecido Vitoriano & Castro-Amoedo, Rafael & Maréchal, François & González, Aldemar Martínez & Escobar Palacio, José Carlos, 2023. "Exergy and economic analysis of the trade-off for design of post-combustion CO2 capture plant by chemical absorption with MEA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    2. Pereira, Luís M.C. & Llovell, Fèlix & Vega, Lourdes F., 2018. "Thermodynamic characterisation of aqueous alkanolamine and amine solutions for acid gas processing by transferable molecular models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 687-703.
    3. Lee, Woo-Sung & Kang, Jun-Ho & Lee, Jae-Cheol & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2020. "Enhancement of energy efficiency by exhaust gas recirculation with oxygen-rich combustion in a natural gas combined cycle with a carbon capture process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    4. Shunji Kang & Zhi Shen & Xizhou Shen & Liuya Fang & Li Xiang & Wenze Yang, 2021. "Experimental investigation on CO2 desorption kinetics from MDEA + PZ and comparison with MDEA/MDEA + DEA aqueous solutions with thermo‐gravimetric analysis method," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(5), pages 974-987, October.
    5. Zhang, Xiaowen & Zhang, Rui & Liu, Helei & Gao, Hongxia & Liang, Zhiwu, 2018. "Evaluating CO2 desorption performance in CO2-loaded aqueous tri-solvent blend amines with and without solid acid catalysts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 417-429.
    6. Liqiang Xu & Qiufang Cui & Te Tu & Shuo Liu & Long Ji & Shuiping Yan, 2020. "Waste heat recovery from the stripped gas in carbon capture process by membrane technology: Hydrophobic and hydrophilic organic membrane cases," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(2), pages 421-435, April.
    7. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of the integrated gasification combined cycle power generation systems with a carbon capture system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    8. Gao, Hongxia & Huang, Yufei & Zhang, Xiaowen & Bairq, Zain Ali Saleh & Huang, Yangqiang & Tontiwachwuthikul, Paitoon & Liang, Zhiwu, 2020. "Catalytic performance and mechanism of SO42−/ZrO2/SBA-15 catalyst for CO2 desorption in CO2-loaded monoethanolamine solution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    9. Yi, Qun & Zhao, Yingjie & Huang, Yi & Wei, Guoqiang & Hao, Yanhong & Feng, Jie & Mohamed, Usama & Pourkashanian, Mohamed & Nimmo, William & Li, Wenying, 2018. "Life cycle energy-economic-CO2 emissions evaluation of biomass/coal, with and without CO2 capture and storage, in a pulverized fuel combustion power plant in the United Kingdom," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 258-272.
    10. Bello, Sara & Galán-Martín, Ángel & Feijoo, Gumersindo & Moreira, Maria Teresa & Guillén-Gosálbez, Gonzalo, 2020. "BECCS based on bioethanol from wood residues: Potential towards a carbon-negative transport and side-effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    11. Hyunyong Lee & Inchul Jung & Gilltae Roh & Youngseung Na & Hokeun Kang, 2020. "Comparative Analysis of On-Board Methane and Methanol Reforming Systems Combined with HT-PEM Fuel Cell and CO 2 Capture/Liquefaction System for Hydrogen Fueled Ship Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, January.
    12. Wu, Ying & Chen, Xiaoping & Ma, Jiliang & Wu, Ye & Liu, Daoyin & Xie, Weiyi, 2020. "System integration optimization for coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture by Na2CO3 dry sorbents," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    13. Guo, Liheng & Ding, Yudong & Liao, Qiang & Zhu, Xun & Wang, Hong, 2022. "A new heat supply strategy for CO2 capture process based on the heat recovery from turbine exhaust steam in a coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    14. Zhao, Bin & Liu, Fangzheng & Cui, Zheng & Liu, Changjun & Yue, Hairong & Tang, Siyang & Liu, Yingying & Lu, Houfang & Liang, Bin, 2017. "Enhancing the energetic efficiency of MDEA/PZ-based CO2 capture technology for a 650MW power plant: Process improvement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 362-375.
    15. Zheng, Yawen & Gao, Lin & He, Song, 2023. "Analysis of the mechanism of energy consumption for CO2 capture in a power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    16. Meunier, Nicolas & Chauvy, Remi & Mouhoubi, Seloua & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2020. "Alternative production of methanol from industrial CO2," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1192-1203.
    17. Zhang, Zhien & Borhani, Tohid N. & Olabi, Abdul G., 2020. "Status and perspective of CO2 absorption process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    18. Arroyave, Juan D. & Chejne, Farid & Mejía, Juan M. & Maya, Juan C., 2020. "Evaluation of CO2 production for enhanced oil recovery from four power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    19. Farajollahi, Hossein & Hossainpour, Siamak, 2017. "Application of organic Rankine cycle in integration of thermal power plant with post-combustion CO2 capture and compression," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 927-936.
    20. Madeddu, Claudio & Errico, Massimiliano & Baratti, Roberto, 2018. "Process analysis for the carbon dioxide chemical absorption–regeneration system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 532-542.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:254:y:2022:i:pa:s0360544222011938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.