IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v253y2022ics0360544222009549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancement of biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion of leather waste with raw and pretreated wheat straw

Author

Listed:
  • Simioni, Taysnara
  • Agustini, Caroline Borges
  • Dettmer, Aline
  • Gutterres, Mariliz

Abstract

This work investigated the effect of the addition of wheat straw on the anaerobic co-digestion of leather waste regarding biogas production. In an attempt to improve biodegradability, wheat straw was pretreated using (i) acid pretreatment with HCl 2% at 90 °C for 2 h, (ii) alkaline pretreatment with NaOH at 30 °C for 24 h and (iii) thermal pretreatment by autoclaving the straw at 121 °C (1 atm) for 15 min. In addition, the combination between the pretreatments (iv) acid + thermal and (v) alkaline + thermal was tested. Pretreatment with alkali seems to affect the wheat straw more with a significant increase in cellulose content and a decrease in hemicellulose and lignin content. However, methanogenesis appears to have been inhibited in these cases, resulting in the lowest biogas production among all the tested issues (8.84 mL/gVSS for alkaline pretreatment and 4.01 mL/gVSS for the combination between alkaline and thermal pretreatments). The highest cumulative biogas yield of 43.15 mL/gVSS was obtained for wheat straw pretreated with HCl, 59% higher than untreated wheat straw (27.12 mL/gVSS) and almost 167% higher than that without wheat straw (16.17 mL/gVSS), indicating that the codigestion studied in this condition is a promising alternative.

Suggested Citation

  • Simioni, Taysnara & Agustini, Caroline Borges & Dettmer, Aline & Gutterres, Mariliz, 2022. "Enhancement of biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion of leather waste with raw and pretreated wheat straw," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:253:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222009549
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222009549
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krishania, M. & Vijay, V.K. & Chandra, R., 2013. "Methane fermentation and kinetics of wheat straw pretreated substrates co-digested with cattle manure in batch assay," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 359-367.
    2. Khalil, Munawar & Berawi, Mohammed Ali & Heryanto, Rudi & Rizalie, Akhmad, 2019. "Waste to energy technology: The potential of sustainable biogas production from animal waste in Indonesia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 323-331.
    3. Mancini, Gabriele & Papirio, Stefano & Lens, Piet N.L. & Esposito, Giovanni, 2018. "Increased biogas production from wheat straw by chemical pretreatments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 608-614.
    4. Rahman, Md. Anisur & Møller, Henrik Bjarne & Saha, Chayan Kumer & Alam, Md. Monjurul & Wahid, Radziah & Feng, Lu, 2018. "Anaerobic co-digestion of poultry droppings and briquetted wheat straw at mesophilic and thermophilic conditions: Influence of alkali pretreatment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PA), pages 241-249.
    5. Yao, Yiqing & Bergeron, Andre David & Davaritouchaee, Maryam, 2018. "Methane recovery from anaerobic digestion of urea-pretreated wheat straw," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 139-148.
    6. Freitas, F.F. & De Souza, S.S. & Ferreira, L.R.A. & Otto, R.B. & Alessio, F.J. & De Souza, S.N.M. & Venturini, O.J. & Ando Junior, O.H., 2019. "The Brazilian market of distributed biogas generation: Overview, technological development and case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 146-157.
    7. Gomes, Carolina Scaraffuni & Repke, Jens-Uwe & Meyer, Michael, 2019. "Diauxie during biogas production from collagen-based substrates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 20-27.
    8. Hagos, Kiros & Zong, Jianpeng & Li, Dongxue & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua, 2017. "Anaerobic co-digestion process for biogas production: Progress, challenges and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1485-1496.
    9. Monlau, Florian & Latrille, Eric & Da Costa, Aline Carvalho & Steyer, Jean-Philippe & Carrère, Hélène, 2013. "Enhancement of methane production from sunflower oil cakes by dilute acid pretreatment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1105-1113.
    10. Chandra, R. & Takeuchi, H. & Hasegawa, T. & Kumar, R., 2012. "Improving biodegradability and biogas production of wheat straw substrates using sodium hydroxide and hydrothermal pretreatments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 273-282.
    11. Gheorghe Lazaroiu & Lucian Mihaescu & Gabriel Negreanu & Constantin Pana & Ionel Pisa & Alexandru Cernat & Dana-Alexandra Ciupageanu, 2018. "Experimental Investigations of Innovative Biomass Energy Harnessing Solutions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Kumar, Subodh & Gandhi, Paras & Yadav, Monika & Paritosh, Kunwar & Pareek, Nidhi & Vivekanand, Vivekanand, 2019. "Weak alkaline treatment of wheat and pearl millet straw for enhanced biogas production and its economic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 753-764.
    13. Li, Yebo & Park, Stephen Y. & Zhu, Jiying, 2011. "Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 821-826, January.
    14. Ferreira, L.R.A. & Otto, R.B. & Silva, F.P. & De Souza, S.N.M. & De Souza, S.S. & Ando Junior, O.H., 2018. "Review of the energy potential of the residual biomass for the distributed generation in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 440-455.
    15. Tyagi, Vinay Kumar & Fdez-Güelfo, L.A. & Zhou, Yan & Álvarez-Gallego, C.J. & Garcia, L.I. Romero & Ng, Wun Jern, 2018. "Anaerobic co-digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW): Progress and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 380-399.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mariana Ferdeș & Gigel Paraschiv & Mariana Ionescu & Mirela Nicoleta Dincă & Georgiana Moiceanu & Bianca Ștefania Zăbavă, 2023. "Anaerobic Co-Digestion: A Way to Potentiate the Synergistic Effect of Multiple Substrates and Microbial Diversity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, F. & Brewer, C.E., 2021. "Conversion of protein-rich lignocellulosic wastes to bio-energy: Review and recommendations for hydrolysis + fermentation and anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    2. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2016. "A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1148-1171.
    3. Akhilesh Kumar Singh & Priti Pal & Saurabh Singh Rathore & Uttam Kumar Sahoo & Prakash Kumar Sarangi & Piotr Prus & Paweł Dziekański, 2023. "Sustainable Utilization of Biowaste Resources for Biogas Production to Meet Rural Bioenergy Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Wang, Zhongzhong & Hu, Yuansheng & Wang, Shun & Wu, Guangxue & Zhan, Xinmin, 2023. "A critical review on dry anaerobic digestion of organic waste: Characteristics, operational conditions, and improvement strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    5. Yang, Liangcheng & Xu, Fuqing & Ge, Xumeng & Li, Yebo, 2015. "Challenges and strategies for solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 824-834.
    6. Yao, Yiqing & Zhou, Jianye & An, Lizhe & Kafle, Gopi Krishna & Chen, Shulin & Qiu, Ling, 2018. "Role of soil in improving process performance and methane yield of anaerobic digestion with corn straw as substrate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 998-1006.
    7. Meneses-Quelal Orlando & Velázquez-Martí Borja, 2020. "Pretreatment of Animal Manure Biomass to Improve Biogas Production: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-28, July.
    8. Lourenço, Vitor Alves & Nadaleti, Willian Cézar & Vieira, Bruno Müller & Chua, Hui, 2021. "Methane production test of the anaerobic sludge from rice parboiling industries with the addition of biodiesel glycerol from rice bran oil in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    9. Siswo Sumardiono & Gebyar Adisukmo & Muthia Hanif & Budiyono Budiyono & Heri Cahyono, 2021. "Effects of Pretreatment and Ratio of Solid Sago Waste to Rumen on Biogas Production through Solid-State Anaerobic Digestion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-11, July.
    10. Paulina-Soledad Vidal-Espinosa & Manuel Alvarez-Vera & Andrés Cárdenas & Juan-Carlos Cobos-Torres, 2023. "Beneficial Microorganisms in the Anaerobic Digestion of Cattle and Swine Excreta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Ndayisenga, Fabrice & Yu, Zhisheng & Zheng, Jianzhong & Wang, Bobo & Liang, Hongxia & Phulpoto, Irfan Ali & Habiyakare, Telesphore & Zhou, Dandan, 2021. "Microbial electrohydrogenesis cell and dark fermentation integrated system enhances biohydrogen production from lignocellulosic agricultural wastes: Substrate pretreatment towards optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    12. Hollas, C.E. & Bolsan, A.C. & Chini, A. & Venturin, B. & Bonassa, G. & Cândido, D. & Antes, F.G. & Steinmetz, R.L.R. & Prado, N.V. & Kunz, A., 2021. "Effects of swine manure storage time on solid-liquid separation and biogas production: A life-cycle assessment approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    13. Zabed, Hossain M. & Akter, Suely & Yun, Junhua & Zhang, Guoyan & Zhang, Yufei & Qi, Xianghui, 2020. "Biogas from microalgae: Technologies, challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    14. Md Amir Suhail & Sandeep Shrivastava & Kunwar Paritosh & Nidhi Pareek & Andrey A. Kovalev & Dmitriy A. Kovalev & Yuri V. Litti & Vladimir Panchenko & Vadim Bolshev & Vivekanand Vivekanand, 2022. "Advances in Applications of Cereal Crop Residues in Green Concrete Technology for Environmental Sustainability: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Alves, Ingrid R.F.S. & Mahler, Claudio F. & Oliveira, Luciano B. & Reis, Marcelo M. & Bassin, João P., 2022. "Investigating the effect of crude glycerol from biodiesel industry on the anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste in ternary mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    16. Adhirashree Vannarath & Arun Kumar Thalla, 2020. "Evaluation, ranking, and selection of pretreatment methods for the conversion of biomass to biogas using multi-criteria decision-making approach," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 510-525, December.
    17. Fernandes, Daniel J. & Ferreira, Ana F. & Fernandes, Edgar C., 2023. "Biogas and biomethane production potential via anaerobic digestion of manure: A case study of Portugal," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    18. Caiado Couto, Lilia & Campos, Luiza C. & da Fonseca-Zang, Warde & Zang, Joachim & Bleischwitz, Raimund, 2021. "Water, waste, energy and food nexus in Brazil: Identifying a resource interlinkage research agenda through a systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    19. Kumar, Atul & Samadder, S.R., 2020. "Performance evaluation of anaerobic digestion technology for energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    20. Poblete, Israel Bernardo S. & Araujo, Ofélia de Queiroz F. & de Medeiros, José Luiz, 2020. "Dynamic analysis of sustainable biogas-combined-cycle plant: Time-varying demand and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:253:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222009549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.