IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v174y2019icp687-695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlations between microbial community and C:N:P stoichiometry during the anaerobic digestion process

Author

Listed:
  • Mao, Chunlan
  • Wang, Yanbo
  • Wang, Xiaojiao
  • Ren, Guangxin
  • Yuan, Liuyan
  • Feng, Yongzhong

Abstract

Ecological stoichiometry (C:N:P ratios) has been widely used to indicated the complicated microbial ecology system and microbial community, however, limited researches have been done in the anaerobic digestion process. In this study, different responses of microbial community to C:N:P stoichiometry were investigated. Results showed that bacterial diversity were higher than archaea; Beta diversity was decreased then remained stable and strongly correlated to C:N:P ratios, while it was not significant for alpha diversity. Furthermore, considering the archaeal dominant order, Methanomicrobiales showed no significant correlation with C:N:P stoichiometric ratios, but closely related to C, Methanosarcinales was positively influenced by C:N ratio, and Methanobacteriales was significantly and negatively impacted by N:P ratio. For bacteria, Clostridiales and Sphaerochaetales closely and positively related to N, Bacteroidales significantly and negatively related to P, but positively to C:N ratio, and Spirochaetales positively related to C. Moreover, changes of microbial taxa were significantly correlated with all considered process variables, which explained 94.1% and 96.6% of total variation in archaea and bacteria taxa, respectively. It is worthy note that these results could be used to predict the process performance and indicate the complicated microbial community by using the simple C:N, C:P and N:P ratios.

Suggested Citation

  • Mao, Chunlan & Wang, Yanbo & Wang, Xiaojiao & Ren, Guangxin & Yuan, Liuyan & Feng, Yongzhong, 2019. "Correlations between microbial community and C:N:P stoichiometry during the anaerobic digestion process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 687-695.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:174:y:2019:i:c:p:687-695
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219302737
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.078?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsapekos, P. & Kougias, P.G. & Treu, L. & Campanaro, S. & Angelidaki, I., 2017. "Process performance and comparative metagenomic analysis during co-digestion of manure and lignocellulosic biomass for biogas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 126-135.
    2. Mao, Chunlan & Wang, Xiaojiao & Xi, Jianchao & Feng, Yongzhong & Ren, Guangxin, 2017. "Linkage of kinetic parameters with process parameters and operational conditions during anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 352-360.
    3. Zheng, Zehui & Liu, Jinhuan & Yuan, Xufeng & Wang, Xiaofen & Zhu, Wanbin & Yang, Fuyu & Cui, Zongjun, 2015. "Effect of dairy manure to switchgrass co-digestion ratio on methane production and the bacterial community in batch anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 249-257.
    4. Li, Wei & Guo, Jianbin & Cheng, Huicai & Wang, Wei & Dong, Renjie, 2017. "Two-phase anaerobic digestion of municipal solid wastes enhanced by hydrothermal pretreatment: Viability, performance and microbial community evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 613-622.
    5. Yuan, Haiping & Zhu, Nanwen, 2016. "Progress in inhibition mechanisms and process control of intermediates and by-products in sewage sludge anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 429-438.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maurizio Bressan & Elena Campagnoli & Carlo Giovanni Ferro & Valter Giaretto, 2023. "A Mass Balance-Based Method for the Anaerobic Digestion of Rice Straw," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Dalke, Rachel & Demro, Delaney & Khalid, Yusra & Wu, Haoran & Urgun-Demirtas, Meltem, 2021. "Current status of anaerobic digestion of food waste in the United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luz, Fábio Codignole & Cordiner, Stefano & Manni, Alessandro & Mulone, Vincenzo & Rocco, Vittorio, 2017. "Anaerobic digestion of coffee grounds soluble fraction at laboratory scale: Evaluation of the biomethane potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 166-175.
    2. Zhou, Jialiang & Zhang, Yuanhui & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Duan, Na, 2021. "Meta-analysis of anaerobic co-digestion of livestock manure in last decade: Identification of synergistic effect and optimization synergy range," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    3. Neshat, Soheil A. & Mohammadi, Maedeh & Najafpour, Ghasem D. & Lahijani, Pooya, 2017. "Anaerobic co-digestion of animal manures and lignocellulosic residues as a potent approach for sustainable biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 308-322.
    4. Syaichurrozi, Iqbal, 2018. "Biogas production from co-digestion Salvinia molesta and rice straw and kinetics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 76-86.
    5. Mao, Chunlan & Xi, Jianchao & Feng, Yongzhong & Wang, Xiaojiao & Ren, Guangxin, 2019. "Biogas production and synergistic correlations of systematic parameters during batch anaerobic digestion of corn straw," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1271-1279.
    6. Yazan, Devrim Murat & Fraccascia, Luca & Mes, Martijn & Zijm, Henk, 2018. "Cooperation in manure-based biogas production networks: An agent-based modeling approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 820-833.
    7. Bacenetti, Jacopo & Sala, Cesare & Fusi, Alessandra & Fiala, Marco, 2016. "Agricultural anaerobic digestion plants: What LCA studies pointed out and what can be done to make them more environmentally sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 669-686.
    8. Syaichurrozi, Iqbal & Basyir, M. Fakhri & Farraz, Rafi Muhammad & Rusdi, Rusdi, 2020. "A preliminary study: Effect of initial pH and Saccharomyces cerevisiae addition on biogas production from acid-pretreated Salvinia molesta and kinetics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    9. El Ibrahimi, Mohammed & Khay, Ismail & El Maakoul, Anas & Bakhouya, Mohamed, 2022. "Effects of the temperature range on the energy performance of mixed and unmixed digesters with submerged waste: An experimental and CFD simulation study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1092-1104.
    10. De Clercq, Djavan & Wen, Zongguo & Caicedo, Luis & Cao, Xin & Fan, Fei & Xu, Ruifei, 2017. "Application of DEA and statistical inference to model the determinants of biomethane production efficiency: A case study in south China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1231-1243.
    11. Ayodele, T.R. & Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O. & Alao, M.A., 2017. "Life cycle assessment of waste-to-energy (WtE) technologies for electricity generation using municipal solid waste in Nigeria," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 200-218.
    12. Lina Luo & Youpei Qu & Weijia Gong & Liyuan Qin & Wenzhe Li & Yong Sun, 2021. "Effect of Particle Size on the Aerobic and Anaerobic Digestion Characteristics of Whole Rice Straw," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, July.
    13. Kainthola, Jyoti & Kalamdhad, Ajay S. & Goud, Vaibhav V., 2020. "Optimization of process parameters for accelerated methane yield from anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and food waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1352-1359.
    14. Li, Pengfei & Cheng, Chongbo & Guo, Rui & Yu, Ran & Jiao, Youzhou & Shen, Dekui & He, Chao, 2022. "Interactions among the components of artificial biomass during their anaerobic digestion with and without sewage sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    15. Theresa Menzel & Peter Neubauer & Stefan Junne, 2020. "Role of Microbial Hydrolysis in Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-29, October.
    16. Hosseini Koupaie, E. & Lin, L. & Bazyar Lakeh, A.A. & Azizi, A. & Dhar, B.R. & Hafez, H. & Elbeshbishy, E., 2021. "Performance evaluation and microbial community analysis of mesophilic and thermophilic sludge fermentation processes coupled with thermal hydrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    17. Kumar, Atul & Samadder, S.R., 2020. "Performance evaluation of anaerobic digestion technology for energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    18. Luz Breton-Deval & Ilse Salinas-Peralta & Jaime Santiago Alarcón Aguirre & Belkis Sulbarán-Rangel & Kelly Joel Gurubel Tun, 2020. "Taxonomic Binning Approaches and Functional Characteristics of the Microbial Community during the Anaerobic Digestion of Hydrolyzed Corncob," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Xionghui Gao & Xiaoyu Tang & Kunyang Zhao & Venkatesh Balan & Qili Zhu, 2021. "Biogas Production from Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Spent Mushroom Substrate with Different Livestock Manure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-15, January.
    20. Douglas Eldo Pereira de Oliveira & Amanda Carvalho Miranda & Milton Vieira Junior & José Carlos Curvelo Santana & Elias Basile Tambourgi & Francesco Facchini & Raffaello Iavagnilio & Luiz Fernando Rod, 2024. "Economic and Environmental Feasibility of Cogeneration from Food Waste: A Case Study in São Paulo City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:174:y:2019:i:c:p:687-695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.