IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v169y2019icp762-775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Will Trump's coal revival plan work? - Comparison of results based on the optimal combined forecasting technique and an extended IPAT forecasting technique

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Qiang
  • Li, Shuyu
  • Li, Rongrong

Abstract

Discussions about United States President Trump's coal revival plan are dominated by qualitative analyses, few quantitative analyses have been conducted. To fill the research gap, this study analyzes the future coal demand of the United States from a market perspective. Both time-series and econometric forecasting techniques are developed to quantify the change of total coal consumption and coal consumption of electricity (sharing over 90% of total coal consumption) in the United States. The proposed time-series forecasting techniques are based on metabolic grey model, Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average Model-grey model, and induced ordered weighted geometric averaging operator. The mean absolute percent error of the proposed technique is less than 1%, indicating the proposed forecasting technique provides reliable information. The forecasting results obtained by time-series model show coal consumption and coal demand for electricity sector in U.S. will continue to decline in the next decade. The proposed econometric forecasting technique is based on the IPAT identity, grey model and Vector Auto-Regression. The combination econometric forecasting technique is used simultaneously to analyze the impact of various internal factors on coal consumption. The results from the proposed econometric technique also show the decline trend of coal demand in the U.S. Thus, the results from the time-series and econometric forecasting technique are consistent. Based on the quantitative analyses, this study contend that Trump's policy is unlikely to revive the coal industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Qiang & Li, Shuyu & Li, Rongrong, 2019. "Will Trump's coal revival plan work? - Comparison of results based on the optimal combined forecasting technique and an extended IPAT forecasting technique," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 762-775.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:169:y:2019:i:c:p:762-775
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218324113
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marian R. Chertow, 2000. "The IPAT Equation and Its Variants," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 4(4), pages 13-29, October.
    2. Wang, Qiang & Li, Shuyu & Li, Rongrong & Ma, Minglu, 2018. "Forecasting U.S. shale gas monthly production using a hybrid ARIMA and metabolic nonlinear grey model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 378-387.
    3. Wang, Qiang & Song, Xiaoxing & Li, Rongrong, 2018. "A novel hybridization of nonlinear grey model and linear ARIMA residual correction for forecasting U.S. shale oil production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1320-1331.
    4. Morten Ørregaard Nielsen & Sergei S. Shibaev, 2015. "Forecasting daily political opinion polls using the fractionally cointegrated VAR model," Working Paper 1340, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    5. Raoufina, Karine, 2016. "Forecasting Employment Growth in Sweden Using a Bayesian VAR Model," Working Papers 144, National Institute of Economic Research.
    6. Sims, Christopher A, 1980. "Macroeconomics and Reality," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 48(1), pages 1-48, January.
    7. Wang, Qiang & Li, Shuyu & Li, Rongrong, 2018. "China's dependency on foreign oil will exceed 80% by 2030: Developing a novel NMGM-ARIMA to forecast China's foreign oil dependence from two dimensions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 151-167.
    8. Wang, Qiang & Li, Shuyu & Li, Rongrong, 2018. "Forecasting energy demand in China and India: Using single-linear, hybrid-linear, and non-linear time series forecast techniques," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 821-831.
    9. Song, Malin & Wang, Shuhong & Yu, Huayin & Yang, Li & Wu, Jie, 2011. "To reduce energy consumption and to maintain rapid economic growth: Analysis of the condition in China based on expended IPAT model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 5129-5134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Yongli & Li, Fang & Yang, Jiale & Zhou, Minhan & Song, Fuhao & Zhang, Danyang & Xue, Lu & Zhu, Jinrong, 2020. "Demand response evaluation of RIES based on improved matter-element extension model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    2. Luo, Xilin & Duan, Huiming & Xu, Kai, 2021. "A novel grey model based on traditional Richards model and its application in COVID-19," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    3. Shuyu Li & Xuan Yang & Rongrong Li, 2019. "Forecasting Coal Consumption in India by 2030: Using Linear Modified Linear (MGM-ARIMA) and Linear Modified Nonlinear (BP-ARIMA) Combined Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Hauenstein, Christian & Holz, Franziska, 2021. "The U.S. coal sector between shale gas and renewables: Last resort coal exports?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    5. Wang, Yongli & Yang, Jiale & Zhou, Minhan & Zhang, Danyang & Song, Fuhao & Dong, Fugui & Zhu, Jinrong & Liu, Lin, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of China's power generation industry based on a matter-element extension model," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    6. Zhang, Boling & Wang, Qian & Wang, Sixia & Tong, Ruipeng, 2023. "Coal power demand and paths to peak carbon emissions in China: A provincial scenario analysis oriented by CO2-related health co-benefits," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    7. Yeqi An & Yulin Zhou & Rongrong Li, 2019. "Forecasting India’s Electricity Demand Using a Range of Probabilistic Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-24, July.
    8. Shuyu Li & Rongrong Li, 2019. "Evaluating Energy Sustainability Using the Pressure-State-Response and Improved Matter-Element Extension Models: Case Study of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    9. Lili Wang & Lina Zhan & Rongrong Li, 2019. "Prediction of the Energy Demand Trend in Middle Africa—A Comparison of MGM, MECM, ARIMA and BP Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    10. Xinyu Han & Rongrong Li, 2019. "Comparison of Forecasting Energy Consumption in East Africa Using the MGM, NMGM, MGM-ARIMA, and NMGM-ARIMA Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-24, August.
    11. Rui Jiang & Rongrong Li & Qiuhong Wu, 2019. "Investigation for the Decomposition of Carbon Emissions in the USA with C-D Function and LMDI Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, January.
    12. Wang, Qiang & Jiang, Feng, 2019. "Integrating linear and nonlinear forecasting techniques based on grey theory and artificial intelligence to forecast shale gas monthly production in Pennsylvania and Texas of the United States," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 781-803.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xinyu Han & Rongrong Li, 2019. "Comparison of Forecasting Energy Consumption in East Africa Using the MGM, NMGM, MGM-ARIMA, and NMGM-ARIMA Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Wang, Qiang & Song, Xiaoxin, 2019. "Forecasting China's oil consumption: A comparison of novel nonlinear-dynamic grey model (GM), linear GM, nonlinear GM and metabolism GM," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 160-171.
    3. Yeqi An & Yulin Zhou & Rongrong Li, 2019. "Forecasting India’s Electricity Demand Using a Range of Probabilistic Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Wang, Qiang & Jiang, Feng, 2019. "Integrating linear and nonlinear forecasting techniques based on grey theory and artificial intelligence to forecast shale gas monthly production in Pennsylvania and Texas of the United States," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 781-803.
    5. Zhineng Hu & Jing Ma & Liangwei Yang & Liming Yao & Meng Pang, 2019. "Monthly electricity demand forecasting using empirical mode decomposition-based state space model," Energy & Environment, , vol. 30(7), pages 1236-1254, November.
    6. Shuyu Li & Xuan Yang & Rongrong Li, 2019. "Forecasting Coal Consumption in India by 2030: Using Linear Modified Linear (MGM-ARIMA) and Linear Modified Nonlinear (BP-ARIMA) Combined Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Lili Wang & Lina Zhan & Rongrong Li, 2019. "Prediction of the Energy Demand Trend in Middle Africa—A Comparison of MGM, MECM, ARIMA and BP Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Yousaf Raza, Muhammad & Lin, Boqiang, 2021. "Oil for Pakistan: What are the main factors affecting the oil import?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    9. Wang, Qiang & Li, Shuyu & Li, Rongrong, 2018. "China's dependency on foreign oil will exceed 80% by 2030: Developing a novel NMGM-ARIMA to forecast China's foreign oil dependence from two dimensions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 151-167.
    10. Abraham Yeboah & Ofosu Agyekum & Vida Owusu-Prempeh & Kwadwo Boateng Prempeh, 2023. "Using social presence theory to predict online consumer engagement in the emerging markets," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Xue-Ting Jiang & Min Su & Rongrong Li, 2018. "Decomposition Analysis in Electricity Sector Output from Carbon Emissions in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Lu, Hongfang & Ma, Xin & Azimi, Mohammadamin, 2020. "US natural gas consumption prediction using an improved kernel-based nonlinear extension of the Arps decline model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    13. Peng, Cheng & Chen, Heng & Lin, Chaoran & Guo, Shuang & Yang, Zhi & Chen, Ke, 2021. "A framework for evaluating energy security in China: Empirical analysis of forecasting and assessment based on energy consumption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    14. Shuyu Li & Rongrong Li, 2019. "Evaluating Energy Sustainability Using the Pressure-State-Response and Improved Matter-Element Extension Models: Case Study of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    15. Minglu Ma & Zhuangzhuang Wang, 2019. "Prediction of the Energy Consumption Variation Trend in South Africa based on ARIMA, NGM and NGM-ARIMA Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Wang, Qiang & Song, Xiaoxing & Li, Rongrong, 2018. "A novel hybridization of nonlinear grey model and linear ARIMA residual correction for forecasting U.S. shale oil production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1320-1331.
    17. Wenting Zhao & Juanjuan Zhao & Xilong Yao & Zhixin Jin & Pan Wang, 2019. "A Novel Adaptive Intelligent Ensemble Model for Forecasting Primary Energy Demand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-28, April.
    18. Shian-Chang Huang & Cheng-Feng Wu, 2018. "Energy Commodity Price Forecasting with Deep Multiple Kernel Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, November.
    19. Xu, Haitao & Pan, Xiongfeng & Guo, Shucen & Lu, Yuduo, 2021. "Forecasting Chinese CO2 emission using a non-linear multi-agent intertemporal optimization model and scenario analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    20. Huang, Liqiao & Liao, Qi & Qiu, Rui & Liang, Yongtu & Long, Yin, 2021. "Prediction-based analysis on power consumption gap under long-term emergency: A case in China under COVID-19," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:169:y:2019:i:c:p:762-775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.