IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v152y2018icp594-600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On methane emissions from shale gas development

Author

Listed:
  • Umeozor, Evar C.
  • Jordaan, Sarah M.
  • Gates, Ian D.

Abstract

Environmental and economic impacts of methane escaping from the natural gas supply chain remain uncertain. Flowback emissions from hydraulically fractured natural gas wells are a key component of emissions from unconventional gas wells. While reduced emission completions in the United States are required by regulation, Canada’s proposed regulation will only be implemented in 2020 with the two highest producing provinces under exemption. To understand potential benefits of regulations, we use predictive modelling of well-level production data of 1633 hydraulically fractured shale gas wells in five plays to estimate pre-production emissions. The mean estimate for flowback emissions (2346 ± 95% confidence interval of 91 Mg CO2e/completion) fall within the 95% confidence limits of measured potential emissions (2566 ± 777 Mg CO2e/completion). Our results indicate that in 2015, the average emissions per shale gas well undergoing flowback was 2347 Mg CO2e/completion in the U.S. and 1859 Mg CO2e/completion in Canada. Mean potential profits from controlling methane emissions using reduced emission completions were US$17,200/well in the U.S. and US$11,200/well in Canada.

Suggested Citation

  • Umeozor, Evar C. & Jordaan, Sarah M. & Gates, Ian D., 2018. "On methane emissions from shale gas development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 594-600.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:152:y:2018:i:c:p:594-600
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218305607
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.151?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James A. Littlefield & Joe Marriott & Greg A. Schivley & Gregory Cooney & Timothy J. Skone, 2016. "Using Common Boundaries to Assess Methane Emissions: A Life Cycle Evaluation of Natural Gas and Coal Power Systems," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 20(6), pages 1360-1369, December.
    2. Zhang, Xiaochun & Myhrvold, Nathan P. & Hausfather, Zeke & Caldeira, Ken, 2016. "Climate benefits of natural gas as a bridge fuel and potential delay of near-zero energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 317-322.
    3. Franziska Holz & Philipp M. Richter & Ruud Egging, 2015. "A Global Perspective on the Future of Natural Gas: Resources, Trade, and Climate Constraints," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 9(1), pages 85-106.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tran, Trung Kien & Lin, Chia-Yang & Tu, Yu-Te & Duong, Nam Tien & Pham Thi, Thuy Dung & Shoh-Jakhon, Khamdamov, 2023. "Nexus between natural resource depletion and rent and COP26 commitments: Empirical evidence from Vietnam," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    2. Shan, Baochao & Wang, Runxi & Guo, Zhaoli & Wang, Peng, 2021. "Contribution quantification of nanoscale gas transport in shale based on strongly inhomogeneous kinetic model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    3. Xi Yang & Alun Gu & Fujie Jiang & Wenli Xie & Qi Wu, 2020. "Integrated Assessment Modeling of China’s Shale Gas Resource: Energy System Optimization, Environmental Cobenefits, and Methane Risk," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Yuan, Zhiyi & Ou, Xunmin & Peng, Tianduo & Yan, Xiaoyu, 2019. "Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of multi-pathways natural gas vehicles in china considering methane leakage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Qin, Chao & Jiang, Yongdong & Luo, Yahuang & Zhou, Junping & Liu, Hao & Song, Xiao & Li, Dong & Zhou, Feng & Xie, Yingliang, 2020. "Effect of supercritical CO2 saturation pressures and temperatures on the methane adsorption behaviours of Longmaxi shale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    6. Feng, Gan & Kang, Yong & Sun, Ze-dong & Wang, Xiao-chuan & Hu, Yao-qing, 2019. "Effects of supercritical CO2 adsorption on the mechanical characteristics and failure mechanisms of shale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 870-882.
    7. Chen, Lei & Huang, Ding-Bin & Wang, Shan-You & Nie, Yi-Nan & He, Ya-Ling & Tao, Wen-Quan, 2019. "A study on dynamic desorption process of methane in slits," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1174-1180.
    8. Wang, Hui & Chen, Li & Qu, Zhiguo & Yin, Ying & Kang, Qinjun & Yu, Bo & Tao, Wen-Quan, 2020. "Modeling of multi-scale transport phenomena in shale gas production — A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Egging-Bratseth, Ruud & Holz, Franziska & Czempinski, Victoria, 2021. "Freedom gas to Europe: Scenarios analyzed using the Global Gas Model," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    2. Burke, Paul J. & Yang, Hewen, 2016. "The price and income elasticities of natural gas demand: International evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 466-474.
    3. Egging, Ruud & Pichler, Alois & Kalvø, Øyvind Iversen & Walle–Hansen, Thomas Meyer, 2017. "Risk aversion in imperfect natural gas markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 367-383.
    4. Ansari, Dawud & Holz, Franziska & Al-Kuhlani, Hashem, 2020. "Energy Outlooks Compared: Global and Regional Insights," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 21-42.
    5. Kemfert, Claudia & Präger, Fabian & Braunger, Isabell & Hoffart, Franziska M. & Brauers, Hanna, 2022. "The expansion of natural gas infrastructure puts energy transitions at risk," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 7, pages 582-587.
    6. Wang, Zhihao & Sharafian, Amir & Mérida, Walter, 2020. "Non-equilibrium thermodynamic model for liquefied natural gas storage tanks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    7. Kis, Zoltán & Pandya, Nikul & Koppelaar, Rembrandt H.E.M., 2018. "Electricity generation technologies: Comparison of materials use, energy return on investment, jobs creation and CO2 emissions reduction," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 144-157.
    8. Richter, Philipp M. & Holz, Franziska, 2015. "All quiet on the eastern front? Disruption scenarios of Russian natural gas supply to Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 177-189.
    9. Wang, Jingfan & Ji, Jingwei & Ravikumar, Arvind P. & Savarese, Silvio & Brandt, Adam R., 2022. "VideoGasNet: Deep learning for natural gas methane leak classification using an infrared camera," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    10. Liu, Liuchen & Zhu, Tong & Pan, Yu & Wang, Hai, 2017. "Multiple energy complementation based on distributed energy systems – Case study of Chongming county, China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 329-336.
    11. Chen, S.J. & Tao, Z.C. & Fu, Y. & Zhu, M. & Li, W.L. & Li, X.D., 2017. "CO2 separation from offshore natural gas in quiescent and flowing states using 13X zeolite," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1435-1446.
    12. Holz, Franziska & Brauers, Hanna & Richter, Philipp M. & Roobeek, Thorsten, 2017. "Shaking Dutch grounds won’t shatter the European gas market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 520-529.
    13. Wang, Jingfan & Tchapmi, Lyne P. & Ravikumar, Arvind P. & McGuire, Mike & Bell, Clay S. & Zimmerle, Daniel & Savarese, Silvio & Brandt, Adam R., 2020. "Machine vision for natural gas methane emissions detection using an infrared camera," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    14. Yeh, Sonia & Cai, Yiyong & Huppman, Daniel & Bernstein, Paul & Tuladhar, Sugandha & Huntington, Hillard G., 2016. "North American natural gas and energy markets in transition: insights from global models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 405-415.
    15. Morgan R. Edwards & Jessika E. Trancik, 2022. "Consequences of equivalency metric design for energy transitions and climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 1-27, November.
    16. Olfati, Mohammad & Bahiraei, Mehdi & Veysi, Farzad, 2019. "A novel modification on preheating process of natural gas in pressure reduction stations to improve energy consumption, exergy destruction and CO2 emission: Preheating based on real demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 598-609.
    17. Temitayo B. Majekodunmi & Mohd Shahidan Shaari & Nor Fadzilah Zainal & Nor Hidayah Harun & Abdul Rahim Ridzuan & Noorazeela Zainol Abidin & Nur Hayati Abd Rahman, 2023. "Gas Consumption as a Key for Low Carbon State and its Impact on Economic Growth in Malaysia: ARDL Approach," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(3), pages 469-477, May.
    18. Robert J. Brecha & Gaurav Ganti & Robin D. Lamboll & Zebedee Nicholls & Bill Hare & Jared Lewis & Malte Meinshausen & Michiel Schaeffer & Christopher J. Smith & Matthew J. Gidden, 2022. "Institutional decarbonization scenarios evaluated against the Paris Agreement 1.5 °C goal," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Valadkhani, Abbas & Nguyen, Jeremy & Bowden, Mark, 2019. "Pathways to reduce CO2 emissions as countries proceed through stages of economic development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 268-278.
    20. Pfoser, Sarah & Schauer, Oliver & Costa, Yasel, 2018. "Acceptance of LNG as an alternative fuel: Determinants and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 259-267.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:152:y:2018:i:c:p:594-600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.