IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v151y2018icp581-593.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative techno-economic assessment and environmental impacts of rice husk-to-fuel conversion technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Unrean, Pornkamol
  • Lai Fui, Bridgid Chin
  • Rianawati, Elisabeth
  • Acda, Menandro

Abstract

This study compared techno-economic performances and environmental impacts of different technologies for rice husk-to-fuel biorefinery – hydrothermal carbonization with pelletization (HTC), pyrolysis (PYR) and anaerobic co-digestion (AD) process – and benchmarked against a conventional direct combustion (DC) for combined heat and power. Economic analysis through techno-economic (TE) model showed HTC with the greatest potentials compared to other processes due to its high-solid operating capacity and could be cost-competitive against the DC technology. Analysis results also highlighted a need for improvement of PYR and AD process in term of the increase of solid loading operation and the exploration of process wastes for better economic benefits and cost competitiveness. Based on life-cycle analysis (LCA) model, HTC yielded the lowest carbon and water footprints from amongst the analyzed options. Nevertheless, all three options had lower GHG emissions and water utilizations than DC process, indicating better environmentally advantageous of these processes. The LCA of three conversion technologies showed better environmental performances mainly lower global warming potential, lower photochemical oxidation potential and lower acidification potential than the DC reference system. The results obtained from this work could be exploited by decision makers for selecting appropriated biomass-to-fuel process based on environmental and economic performances.

Suggested Citation

  • Unrean, Pornkamol & Lai Fui, Bridgid Chin & Rianawati, Elisabeth & Acda, Menandro, 2018. "Comparative techno-economic assessment and environmental impacts of rice husk-to-fuel conversion technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 581-593.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:151:y:2018:i:c:p:581-593
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218305218
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.112?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xinhua Shen & Raghava R. Kommalapati & Ziaul Huque, 2015. "The Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Power Generation from Lignocellulosic Biomass," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Unrean, Pornkamol & Khajeeram, Sutamat, 2016. "Optimization and techno-economic assessment of high-solid fed-batch saccharification and ethanol fermentation by Scheffersomyces stipitis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae consortium," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1062-1072.
    3. Francesco Cherubini & Thomas Gasser & Ryan M. Bright & Philippe Ciais & Anders H. Strømman, 2014. "Linearity between temperature peak and bioenergy CO2 emission rates," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(11), pages 983-987, November.
    4. Gao, Ying & Wang, Xianhua & Wang, Jun & Li, Xiangpeng & Cheng, Jianjun & Yang, Haiping & Chen, Hanping, 2013. "Effect of residence time on chemical and structural properties of hydrochar obtained by hydrothermal carbonization of water hyacinth," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 376-383.
    5. Prasertsan, S. & Sajjakulnukit, B., 2006. "Biomass and biogas energy in Thailand: Potential, opportunity and barriers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 599-610.
    6. F. Cherubini & T. Gasser & R. M. Bright & Philippe Ciais & A. H. Stromman, 2014. "Linearity between temperature peak and bioenergy CO2 emission rates," Post-Print hal-01239786, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christos Boukouvalas & Tryfon Kekes & Vasiliki Oikonomopoulou & Magdalini Krokida, 2024. "Life Cycle Assessment of Energy Production from Solid Waste Valorization and Wastewater Purification: A Case Study of Meat Processing Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Manfredi Picciotto Maniscalco & Maurizio Volpe & Antonio Messineo, 2020. "Hydrothermal Carbonization as a Valuable Tool for Energy and Environmental Applications: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Akbar Saba & Kyle McGaughy & M. Toufiq Reza, 2019. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Co-Hydrothermal Carbonization of a Coal-Miscanthus Blend," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. López, R. & González-Arias, J. & Pereira, F.J. & Fernández, C. & Cara-Jiménez, J., 2021. "A techno-economic study of HTC processes coupled with power facilities and oxy-combustion systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    5. Liu, Yang & Lyu, Yizheng & Tian, Jinping & Zhao, Jialing & Ye, Ning & Zhang, Yongming & Chen, Lujun, 2021. "Review of waste biorefinery development towards a circular economy: From the perspective of a life cycle assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Bruno Rafael de Almeida Moreira & Ronaldo da Silva Viana & Victor Hugo Cruz & Paulo Renato Matos Lopes & Celso Tadao Miasaki & Anderson Chagas Magalhães & Paulo Alexandre Monteiro de Figueiredo & Luca, 2020. "Anti-Thermal Shock Binding of Liquid-State Food Waste to Non-Wood Pellets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    7. Lee, Jongkeun & Lee, Kwanyong & Sohn, Donghwan & Kim, Young Mo & Park, Ki Young, 2018. "Hydrothermal carbonization of lipid extracted algae for hydrochar production and feasibility of using hydrochar as a solid fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 913-920.
    8. Mostafa, Mohamed E. & Hu, Song & Wang, Yi & Su, Sheng & Hu, Xun & Elsayed, Saad A. & Xiang, Jun, 2019. "The significance of pelletization operating conditions: An analysis of physical and mechanical characteristics as well as energy consumption of biomass pellets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 332-348.
    9. Imtiaz Anando, Ahmed & Ehsan, M Monjurul & Karim, Md Rezwanul & Bhuiyan, Arafat A. & Ahiduzzaman, Md & Karim, Azharul, 2023. "Thermochemical pretreatments to improve the fuel properties of rice husk: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    10. Akbari, Maryam & Oyedun, Adetoyese Olajire & Kumar, Amit, 2020. "Techno-economic assessment of wet and dry torrefaction of biomass feedstock," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    11. Martín-Gamboa, Mario & Marques, Pedro & Freire, Fausto & Arroja, Luís & Dias, Ana Cláudia, 2020. "Life cycle assessment of biomass pellets: A review of methodological choices and results," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    12. Bagnato, Giuseppe & Boulet, Florent & Sanna, Aimaro, 2019. "Effect of Li-LSX zeolite, NiCe/Al2O3 and NiCe/ZrO2 on the production of drop-in bio-fuels by pyrolysis and hydrotreating of Nannochloropsis and isochrysis microalgae," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 199-213.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Niko Heeren & Stefanie Hellweg, 2019. "Tracking Construction Material over Space and Time: Prospective and Geo‐referenced Modeling of Building Stocks and Construction Material Flows," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 253-267, February.
    2. T. Gasser & C. Guivarch & K. Tachiiri & C. D. Jones & P. Ciais, 2015. "Negative emissions physically needed to keep global warming below 2 °C," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-7, November.
    3. Parnphumeesup, Piya & Kerr, Sandy A., 2011. "Stakeholder preferences towards the sustainable development of CDM projects: Lessons from biomass (rice husk) CDM project in Thailand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3591-3601, June.
    4. Tiago Teribele & Maria Elizabeth Gemaque Costa & Conceição de Maria Sales da Silva & Lia Martins Pereira & Lucas Pinto Bernar & Douglas Alberto Rocha de Castro & Fernanda Paula da Costa Assunção & Mar, 2023. "Hydrothermal Carbonization of Corn Stover: Structural Evolution of Hydro-Char and Degradation Kinetics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Maw Maw Tun & Dagmar Juchelková, 2019. "Biomass Sources and Energy Potential for Energy Sector in Myanmar: An Outlook," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Gao, Pin & Zhou, Yiyuan & Meng, Fang & Zhang, Yihui & Liu, Zhenhong & Zhang, Wenqi & Xue, Gang, 2016. "Preparation and characterization of hydrochar from waste eucalyptus bark by hydrothermal carbonization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 238-245.
    7. Baharoon, Dhyia Aidroos & Rahman, Hasimah Abdul & Fadhl, Saeed Obaid, 2016. "Publics׳ knowledge, attitudes and behavioral toward the use of solar energy in Yemen power sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 498-515.
    8. Chihiro Kayo & Ryu Noda, 2018. "Climate Change Mitigation Potential of Wood Use in Civil Engineering in Japan Based on Life-Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Neves, Renato Cruz & Klein, Bruno Colling & da Silva, Ricardo Justino & Rezende, Mylene Cristina Alves Ferreira & Funke, Axel & Olivarez-Gómez, Edgardo & Bonomi, Antonio & Maciel-Filho, Rubens, 2020. "A vision on biomass-to-liquids (BTL) thermochemical routes in integrated sugarcane biorefineries for biojet fuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. José Antonio Soriano & Reyes García-Contreras & Antonio José Carpio de Los Pinos, 2021. "Study of the Thermochemical Properties of Lignocellulosic Biomass from Energy Crops," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Kambo, Harpreet Singh & Dutta, Animesh, 2015. "A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 359-378.
    12. Carla Silva & Patricia Moniz & Ana Cristina Oliveira & Samuela Vercelli & Alberto Reis & Teresa Lopes da Silva, 2022. "Cascading Crypthecodinium cohnii Biorefinery: Global Warming Potential and Techno-Economic Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.
    13. Lim, Xin-Le & Lam, Wei-Haur, 2014. "Public Acceptance of Marine Renewable Energy in Malaysia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 16-26.
    14. Mau, Vivian & Gross, Amit, 2018. "Energy conversion and gas emissions from production and combustion of poultry-litter-derived hydrochar and biochar," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 510-519.
    15. Cheng, Shikun & Li, Zifu & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Neupane, Kalidas & Wauthelet, Marc & Huba, Elisabeth-Maria, 2014. "Application of fault tree approach for technical assessment of small-sized biogas systems in Nepal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1372-1381.
    16. Yaqoot, Mohammed & Diwan, Parag & Kandpal, Tara C., 2017. "Financial attractiveness of decentralized renewable energy systems – A case of the central Himalayan state of Uttarakhand in India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 973-991.
    17. Smoliński, Adam & Stańczyk, Krzysztof & Howaniec, Natalia, 2010. "Steam gasification of selected energy crops in a fixed bed reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 397-404.
    18. Stich, J. & Ramachandran, S. & Hamacher, T. & Stimming, U., 2017. "Techno-economic estimation of the power generation potential from biomass residues in Southeast Asia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 930-942.
    19. Aaron E. Brown & Jessica M. M. Adams & Oliver R. Grasham & Miller Alonso Camargo-Valero & Andrew B. Ross, 2020. "An Assessment of Different Integration Strategies of Hydrothermal Carbonisation and Anaerobic Digestion of Water Hyacinth," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    20. Purohit, Pallav & Michaelowa, Axel, 2007. "CDM potential of bagasse cogeneration in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 4779-4798, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:151:y:2018:i:c:p:581-593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.