IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v142y2018icp559-577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of single-pressure single-stage and multi-stage CO2 transcritical power cycles for engine waste heat recovery: A comparative study

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Shun-sen
  • Wu, Chuang
  • Li, Jun

Abstract

The present work mainly focuses on the thermodynamic and exergoeconomic comparisons between the novel single-pressure multi-stage CDTPCs (carbon dioxide transcritical power cycles) and single-pressure single-stage CDTPC for engine waste heat recovery. A method based on exergy fuel distribution is proposed to calculate the fuel cost for the bottoming CDTPCs. Parametric analysis is conducted to study effects of the decision variables on the performances of the considered CDTPCs, which are also optimized and compared. The thermodynamic study shows that the double-stage CDTPC can produce the highest net power output of 517.27 kW for a 2928 kW engine at exhaust gas temperature of 470 °C. The exergoeconomic study reveals that the single-stage CDTPC has the lowest total unit cost when exhaust gas temperature is 300–600 °C and the double-stage CDTPC is recommended when exhaust gas temperature is 530–600 °C due to better thermodynamic and exergoeconomic performances. Meanwhile, the triple-stage CDTPC is not recommended when exhaust gas temperature is 300–600 °C considering thermodynamics and exergoeconomics. A multi-objective optimization is also conducted to obtain an optimal condition for the considered CDTPCs for the case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Shun-sen & Wu, Chuang & Li, Jun, 2018. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of single-pressure single-stage and multi-stage CO2 transcritical power cycles for engine waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 559-577.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:142:y:2018:i:c:p:559-577
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.10.055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217317619
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2017.10.055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baik, Young-Jin & Kim, Minsung & Chang, Ki Chang & Kim, Sung Jin, 2011. "Power-based performance comparison between carbon dioxide and R125 transcritical cycles for a low-grade heat source," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 892-898, March.
    2. Zare, V. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Yari, M., 2013. "An exergoeconomic investigation of waste heat recovery from the Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor (GT-MHR) employing an ammonia–water power/cooling cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 397-409.
    3. Gewald, Daniela & Siokos, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2012. "Waste heat recovery from a landfill gas-fired power plant," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 1779-1789.
    4. Shu, Gequn & Liu, Lina & Tian, Hua & Wei, Haiqiao & Yu, Guopeng, 2014. "Parametric and working fluid analysis of a dual-loop organic Rankine cycle (DORC) used in engine waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1188-1198.
    5. Shu, Gequn & Shi, Lingfeng & Tian, Hua & Li, Xiaoya & Huang, Guangdai & Chang, Liwen, 2016. "An improved CO2-based transcritical Rankine cycle (CTRC) used for engine waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 171-182.
    6. Shu, Gequn & Li, Xiaoning & Tian, Hua & Liang, Xingyu & Wei, Haiqiao & Wang, Xu, 2014. "Alkanes as working fluids for high-temperature exhaust heat recovery of diesel engine using organic Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 204-217.
    7. Wu, Chuang & Yan, Xiao-jiang & Wang, Shun-sen & Bai, Kun-lun & Di, Juan & Cheng, Shang-fang & Li, Jun, 2016. "System optimisation and performance analysis of CO2 transcritical power cycle for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 391-400.
    8. Fu, Jianqin & Liu, Jingping & Feng, Renhua & Yang, Yanping & Wang, Linjun & Wang, Yong, 2013. "Energy and exergy analysis on gasoline engine based on mapping characteristics experiment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 622-630.
    9. Macián, V. & Serrano, J.R. & Dolz, V. & Sánchez, J., 2013. "Methodology to design a bottoming Rankine cycle, as a waste energy recovering system in vehicles. Study in a HDD engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 758-771.
    10. Vaja, Iacopo & Gambarotta, Agostino, 2010. "Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) bottoming with Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 1084-1093.
    11. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Tsatsaronis, George, 2006. "SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1257-1289.
    12. Wang, Xurong & Dai, Yiping, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis of utilizing the transcritical CO2 cycle and the ORC for a recompression supercritical CO2 cycle waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 193-207.
    13. Cayer, Emmanuel & Galanis, Nicolas & Desilets, Martin & Nesreddine, Hakim & Roy, Philippe, 2009. "Analysis of a carbon dioxide transcritical power cycle using a low temperature source," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(7-8), pages 1055-1063, July.
    14. Yu, Guopeng & Shu, Gequn & Tian, Hua & Wei, Haiqiao & Liu, Lina, 2013. "Simulation and thermodynamic analysis of a bottoming Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) of diesel engine (DE)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 281-290.
    15. Yun, Kyung Tae & Cho, Heejin & Luck, Rogelio & Mago, Pedro J., 2013. "Modeling of reciprocating internal combustion engines for power generation and heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 327-335.
    16. Chen, Huijuan & Yogi Goswami, D. & Rahman, Muhammad M. & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2011. "Energetic and exergetic analysis of CO2- and R32-based transcritical Rankine cycles for low-grade heat conversion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2802-2808, August.
    17. Cayer, Emmanuel & Galanis, Nicolas & Nesreddine, Hakim, 2010. "Parametric study and optimization of a transcritical power cycle using a low temperature source," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 1349-1357, April.
    18. Akbari, Ata D. & Mahmoudi, Seyed M.S., 2014. "Thermoeconomic analysis & optimization of the combined supercritical CO2 (carbon dioxide) recompression Brayton/organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 501-512.
    19. Paltsev, Sergey & Zhang, Danwei, 2015. "Natural gas pricing reform in China: Getting closer to a market system?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 43-56.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xia, Jiaxi & Wang, Jiangfeng & Lou, Juwei & Hu, Jianjun & Yao, Sen, 2023. "Thermodynamic, economic, environmental analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel combined cooling and power system for cascade utilization of engine waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    2. Sun, Lei & Tang, Bo & Xie, Yonghui, 2022. "Performance assessment of two compressed and liquid carbon dioxide energy storage systems: Thermodynamic, exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    3. Behzadi, Amirmohammad & Habibollahzade, Ali & Ahmadi, Pouria & Gholamian, Ehsan & Houshfar, Ehsan, 2019. "Multi-objective design optimization of a solar based system for electricity, cooling, and hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 696-709.
    4. Giovanni Manente & Mário Costa, 2020. "On the Conceptual Design of Novel Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-31, January.
    5. Jin, Qinglong & Xia, Shaojun & Chen, Lingen, 2023. "A modified recompression S–CO2 Brayton cycle and its thermodynamic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    6. Behzadi, Amirmohammad & Arabkoohsar, Ahmad & Gholamian, Ehsan, 2020. "Multi-criteria optimization of a biomass-fired proton exchange membrane fuel cell integrated with organic rankine cycle/thermoelectric generator using different gasification agents," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    7. Li, Ligeng & Tian, Hua & Shi, Lingfeng & Wang, Jingyu & Li, Min & Shu, Gequn, 2021. "Adaptive flow assignment for CO2 transcritical power cycle (CTPC): An engine operational profile-based off-design study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    8. Li, Ligeng & Tian, Hua & Shi, Lingfeng & Zhang, Yonghao & Huang, Guangdai & Zhang, Hongfei & Wang, Xuan & Shu, Gequn, 2022. "Experimental investigation of a splitting CO2 transcritical power cycle in engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    9. Li, Huabin & Tao, Ye & Zhang, Yang & Fu, Hong, 2022. "Two-objective optimization of a hybrid solar-geothermal system with thermal energy storage for power, hydrogen and freshwater production based on transcritical CO2 cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 51-66.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shu, Gequn & Shi, Lingfeng & Tian, Hua & Deng, Shuai & Li, Xiaoya & Chang, Liwen, 2017. "Configurations selection maps of CO2-based transcritical Rankine cycle (CTRC) for thermal energy management of engine waste heat," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P3), pages 423-435.
    2. Shu, Gequn & Shi, Lingfeng & Tian, Hua & Li, Xiaoya & Huang, Guangdai & Chang, Liwen, 2016. "An improved CO2-based transcritical Rankine cycle (CTRC) used for engine waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 171-182.
    3. Li, Ligeng & Tian, Hua & Liu, Peng & Shi, Lingfeng & Shu, Gequn, 2021. "Optimization of CO2 Transcritical Power Cycle (CTPC) for engine waste heat recovery based on split concept," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    4. Shu, Gequn & Li, Xiaoning & Tian, Hua & Liang, Xingyu & Wei, Haiqiao & Wang, Xu, 2014. "Alkanes as working fluids for high-temperature exhaust heat recovery of diesel engine using organic Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 204-217.
    5. Xia, Jiaxi & Wang, Jiangfeng & Zhou, Kehan & Zhao, Pan & Dai, Yiping, 2018. "Thermodynamic and economic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel transcritical CO2 Rankine cycle with an ejector driven by low grade heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 337-351.
    6. Yang, Fubin & Cho, Heejin & Zhang, Hongguang & Zhang, Jian, 2017. "Thermoeconomic multi-objective optimization of a dual loop organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for CNG engine waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1100-1118.
    7. Song, Jian & Gu, Chun-wei, 2015. "Performance analysis of a dual-loop organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system with wet steam expansion for engine waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 280-289.
    8. Huang, Guangdai & Shu, Gequn & Tian, Hua & Shi, Lingfeng & Zhuge, Weilin & Zhang, Jing & Atik, Mohammad Atikur Rahman, 2020. "Development and experimental study of a supercritical CO2 axial turbine applied for engine waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    9. Wang, Xurong & Dai, Yiping, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis of utilizing the transcritical CO2 cycle and the ORC for a recompression supercritical CO2 cycle waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 193-207.
    10. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua & Hung, Tzu-Chen, 2017. "Thermo-economic analysis of the transcritical organic Rankine cycle using R1234yf/R32 mixtures as the working fluids for lower-grade waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 818-836.
    11. Rovira, Antonio & Muñoz, Marta & Sánchez, Consuelo & Martínez-Val, José María, 2015. "Proposal and study of a balanced hybrid Rankine–Brayton cycle for low-to-moderate temperature solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 305-317.
    12. Lingfeng Shi & Gequn Shu & Hua Tian & Guangdai Huang & Liwen Chang & Tianyu Chen & Xiaoya Li, 2017. "Ideal Point Design and Operation of CO 2 -Based Transcritical Rankine Cycle (CTRC) System Based on High Utilization of Engine’s Waste Heats," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, October.
    13. Shi, Lingfeng & Shu, Gequn & Tian, Hua & Wang, Xuan, 2020. "Assessment of waste heat recovery system for automotive engine with weight effect," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    14. Sarkar, Jahar, 2015. "Analyses and optimization of a supercritical N2O Rankine cycle for low-grade heat conversion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 344-351.
    15. Yu, Xiaoli & Li, Zhi & Lu, Yiji & Huang, Rui & Roskilly, Anthony Paul, 2019. "Investigation of organic Rankine cycle integrated with double latent thermal energy storage for engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1098-1112.
    16. Sarkar, Jahar, 2015. "Review and future trends of supercritical CO2 Rankine cycle for low-grade heat conversion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 434-451.
    17. Pezzuolo, Alex & Benato, Alberto & Stoppato, Anna & Mirandola, Alberto, 2016. "The ORC-PD: A versatile tool for fluid selection and Organic Rankine Cycle unit design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 605-620.
    18. Yang, Min-Hsiung, 2016. "Optimizations of the waste heat recovery system for a large marine diesel engine based on transcritical Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1109-1124.
    19. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2012. "Exergy analysis and parameter study on a novel auto-cascade Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 539-547.
    20. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:142:y:2018:i:c:p:559-577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.