IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v140y2017ip1p520-529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic performance assessment of solar based Sulfur-Iodine thermochemical cycle for hydrogen generation

Author

Listed:
  • Yilmaz, Fatih
  • Selbaş, Reşat

Abstract

Recent studies show that thermochemical cycles has a great potential for green hydrogen generation. In this study, the thermodynamic performance assessment of a solar based Sulfur-Iodine (S-I) thermochemical cycle for hydrogen generation is performed focusing on the energy and exergy methods. Moreover, we investigated that various reference environment and reaction temperatures effects on energy and exergy efficiencies of S-I cycle steps. The results of thermodynamic analyses indicated that energy and exergy efficiency of S-I cycle are found to be 43.85% and 62.39%, respectively. In addition, the overall energy and exergy efficiencies of cycle are computed as, 32.76% and 34.56%, respectively. It was concluded that the S-I thermochemical cycle offers a feasible and a diverse option for hydrogen generation and seems to be a promising cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Yilmaz, Fatih & Selbaş, Reşat, 2017. "Thermodynamic performance assessment of solar based Sulfur-Iodine thermochemical cycle for hydrogen generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 520-529.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:140:y:2017:i:p1:p:520-529
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.08.121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217314962
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2017.08.121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ozbilen, Ahmet & Dincer, Ibrahim & Rosen, Marc A., 2014. "Development of new heat exchanger network designs for a four-step Cu–Cl cycle for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 338-351.
    2. Tolga Balta, M. & Dincer, Ibrahim & Hepbasli, Arif, 2010. "Energy and exergy analyses of a new four-step copper–chlorine cycle for geothermal-based hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 3263-3272.
    3. Tsatsaronis, George & Kapanke, Kerstin & María Blanco Marigorta, Ana, 2008. "Exergoeconomic estimates for a novel zero-emission process generating hydrogen and electric power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 321-330.
    4. García, Lázaro & González, Daniel & García, Carlos & García, Laura & Brayner, Carlos, 2013. "Efficiency of the sulfur–iodine thermochemical water splitting process for hydrogen production based on ADS (accelerator driven system)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 469-477.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiao, Fan & Lu, Buchu & Chen, Chen & Liu, Qibin, 2021. "Exergy transfer and degeneration in thermochemical cycle reactions for hydrogen production: Novel exergy- and energy level-based methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    2. Mohsen Fallah Vostakola & Babak Salamatinia & Bahman Amini Horri, 2022. "A Review on Recent Progress in the Integrated Green Hydrogen Production Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-41, February.
    3. Sadeghi, Shayan & Ghandehariun, Samane, 2022. "A standalone solar thermochemical water splitting hydrogen plant with high-temperature molten salt: Thermodynamic and economic analyses and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    4. Lu, Buchu & Jiao, Fan & Chen, Chen & Yan, Xiangyu & Liu, Qibin, 2023. "Temperature-entropy and energy utilization diagrams for energy, exergy, and energy level analysis in solar water splitting reactions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    5. Zenon Ziobrowski & Adam Rotkegel, 2024. "Assessment of Hydrogen Energy Industry Chain Based on Hydrogen Production Methods, Storage, and Utilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-22, April.
    6. Razi, Faran & Dincer, Ibrahim & Gabriel, Kamiel, 2020. "Energy and exergy analyses of a new integrated thermochemical copper-chlorine cycle for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    7. Ni, Hang & Peng, Wei & Qu, Xinhe & Zhao, Gang & Zhang, Ping & Wang, Jie, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis of a novel hydrogen–electricity–heat polygeneration system based on a very high-temperature gas-cooled reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    8. Qureshi, Fazil & Yusuf, Mohammad & Kamyab, Hesam & Vo, Dai-Viet N. & Chelliapan, Shreeshivadasan & Joo, Sang-Woo & Vasseghian, Yasser, 2022. "Latest eco-friendly avenues on hydrogen production towards a circular bioeconomy: Currents challenges, innovative insights, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    9. Ni, Hang & Qu, Xinhe & Peng, Wei & Zhao, Gang & Zhang, Ping, 2023. "Study of two innovative hydrogen and electricity co-production systems based on very-high-temperature gas-cooled reactors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    10. González Rodríguez, Daniel & Brayner de Oliveira Lira, Carlos Alberto & García Parra, Lázaro Roger & García Hernández, Carlos Rafael & de la Torre Valdés, Raciel, 2018. "Computational model of a sulfur-iodine thermochemical water splitting system coupled to a VHTR for nuclear hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1165-1176.
    11. Yadav, Deepak & Banerjee, Rangan, 2022. "Thermodynamic and economic analysis of the solar carbothermal and hydrometallurgy routes for zinc production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kanoglu, Mehmet & Ayanoglu, Abdulkadir & Abusoglu, Aysegul, 2011. "Exergoeconomic assessment of a geothermal assisted high temperature steam electrolysis system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4422-4433.
    2. Temiz, Mert & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2021. "Concentrated solar driven thermochemical hydrogen production plant with thermal energy storage and geothermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    3. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Hosseinpour, Soleiman & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Younesi, Habibollah & Najafpour, Ghasem, 2016. "On the exergetic optimization of continuous photobiological hydrogen production using hybrid ANFIS–NSGA-II (adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system–non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 507-520.
    4. Sadeghi, Shayan & Ghandehariun, Samane, 2022. "A standalone solar thermochemical water splitting hydrogen plant with high-temperature molten salt: Thermodynamic and economic analyses and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    5. Yilmaz, Ceyhun & Kanoglu, Mehmet, 2014. "Thermodynamic evaluation of geothermal energy powered hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 592-602.
    6. Silveira, Jose Luz & Lamas, Wendell de Queiroz & Tuna, Celso Eduardo & Villela, Iraides Aparecida de Castro & Miro, Laura Siso, 2012. "Ecological efficiency and thermoeconomic analysis of a cogeneration system at a hospital," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2894-2906.
    7. Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2018. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluation of an SOFC-Engine hybrid power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 810-822.
    8. Michalsky, Ronald & Parman, Bryon J. & Amanor-Boadu, Vincent & Pfromm, Peter H., 2012. "Solar thermochemical production of ammonia from water, air and sunlight: Thermodynamic and economic analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 251-260.
    9. Stempien, Jan Pawel & Sun, Qiang & Chan, Siew Hwa, 2013. "Performance of power generation extension system based on solid-oxide electrolyzer cells under various design conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 647-657.
    10. Loghmani, Mohammad Hassan & Shojaei, Abdollah Fallah & Khakzad, Morteza, 2017. "Hydrogen generation as a clean energy through hydrolysis of sodium borohydride over Cu-Fe-B nano powders: Effect of polymers and surfactants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 830-840.
    11. Razi, Faran & Dincer, Ibrahim & Gabriel, Kamiel, 2020. "Energy and exergy analyses of a new integrated thermochemical copper-chlorine cycle for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    12. González Rodríguez, Daniel & Brayner de Oliveira Lira, Carlos Alberto & García Parra, Lázaro Roger & García Hernández, Carlos Rafael & de la Torre Valdés, Raciel, 2018. "Computational model of a sulfur-iodine thermochemical water splitting system coupled to a VHTR for nuclear hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1165-1176.
    13. Manassaldi, Juan I. & Mussati, Sergio F. & Scenna, Nicolás J., 2011. "Optimal synthesis and design of Heat Recovery Steam Generation (HRSG) via mathematical programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 475-485.
    14. Papadis, Elisa & Tsatsaronis, George, 2020. "Challenges in the decarbonization of the energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    15. Mohammad Hossein Ahmadi & Seyed Ali Banihashem & Mahyar Ghazvini & Milad Sadeghzadeh, 2018. "Thermo-economic and exergy assessment and optimization of performance of a hydrogen production system by using geothermal energy," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(8), pages 1373-1392, December.
    16. Wei, Zhiqiang & Zhang, Bingjian & Wu, Shengyuan & Chen, Qinglin & Tsatsaronis, George, 2012. "Energy-use analysis and evaluation of distillation systems through avoidable exergy destruction and investment costs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 424-433.
    17. Fan, Guangli & Ahmadi, A. & Ehyaei, M.A. & Das, Biplab, 2021. "Energy, exergy, economic and exergoenvironmental analyses of polygeneration system integrated gas cycle, absorption chiller, and Copper-Chlorine thermochemical cycle to produce power, cooling, and hyd," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    18. Ligang Wang & Yongping Yang & Changqing Dong & Zhiping Yang & Gang Xu & Lingnan Wu, 2012. "Exergoeconomic Evaluation of a Modern Ultra-Supercritical Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-17, September.
    19. Huang, Kefeng & Karimi, I.A., 2016. "Work-heat exchanger network synthesis (WHENS)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1006-1017.
    20. Jarosław Gryz & Krzysztof Król & Anna Witkowska & Mariusz Ruszel, 2021. "Mobile Nuclear-Hydrogen Synergy in NATO Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-12, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:140:y:2017:i:p1:p:520-529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.