IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i23p7955-d690311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mobile Nuclear-Hydrogen Synergy in NATO Operations

Author

Listed:
  • Jarosław Gryz

    (Faculty of National Security, War Studies University, Al. Gen. Chruściela “Montera”, 00-910 Warsaw, Poland
    Current address: Faculty of National Security, War Studies University, Al. Gen. Chruściela “Montera” 103, 00-910 Warsaw, Poland.
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Krzysztof Król

    (National Centre for Nuclear Reseach Radioisotope Centre POLATOM, ul. Andrzeja Sołtana 7, 05-400 Otwock, Poland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Anna Witkowska

    (Ignacy Lukasiewicz Institute for Energy Policy, Technological Incubator 4, Jasionka 954E, 36-002 Jasionka, Poland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Mariusz Ruszel

    (Faculty of Economics, Rzeszów University of Technology, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland)

Abstract

An uninterrupted chain of energy supplies is the core of every activity, without exception for the operations of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. A robust and efficient energy supply is fundamental for the success of missions and a guarantee of soldier safety. However, organizing a battlefield energy supply chain is particularly challenging because the risks and threats are particularly high. Moreover, the energy supply chain is expected to be flexible according to mission needs and able to be moved quickly if necessary. In line with ongoing technological changes, the growing popularity of hydrogen is undeniable and has been noticed by NATO as well. Hydrogen is characterised by a much higher energy density per unit mass than other fuels, which means that hydrogen fuel can increase the range of military vehicles. Consequently, hydrogen could eliminate the need for risky refuelling stops during missions as well as the number of fatalities associated with fuel delivery in combat areas. Our research shows that a promising prospect lies in the mobile technologies based on hydrogen in combination with use of the nuclear microreactors. Nuclear microreactors are small enough to be easily transported to their destinations on heavy trucks. Depending on the design, nuclear microreactors can produce 1–20 MW of thermal energy that could be used directly as heat or converted to electric power or for non-electric applications such as hydrogen fuel production. The aim of the article is to identify a model of nuclear-hydrogen synergy for use in NATO operations. We identify opportunities and threats related to mobile energy generation with nuclear-hydrogen synergy in NATO operations. The research presented in this paper identifies the best method of producing hydrogen using a nuclear microreactor. A popular and environmentally “clean” solution is electrolysis due to the simplicity of the process. However, this is less efficient than chemical processes based on, for example, the sulphur-iodine cycle. The results of the research presented in this paper show which of the methods and which cycle is the most attractive for the production of hydrogen with the use of mini-reactors. The verification criteria include: the efficiency of the process, its complexity and the residues generated as a result of the process (waste)—all taking into account usage for military purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jarosław Gryz & Krzysztof Król & Anna Witkowska & Mariusz Ruszel, 2021. "Mobile Nuclear-Hydrogen Synergy in NATO Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-12, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:23:p:7955-:d:690311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/23/7955/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/23/7955/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ana L. Santos & Maria-João Cebola & Diogo M. F. Santos, 2021. "Towards the Hydrogen Economy—A Review of the Parameters That Influence the Efficiency of Alkaline Water Electrolyzers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-35, May.
    2. Nuttall, W. & Samaras, C. & Bazilian, M., 2017. "Energy and the Military: Convergence of Security, Economic, and Environmental Decision-Making," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1752, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    3. Andreas Rosenstiel & Nathalie Monnerie & Jürgen Dersch & Martin Roeb & Robert Pitz-Paal & Christian Sattler, 2021. "Electrochemical Hydrogen Production Powered by PV/CSP Hybrid Power Plants: A Modelling Approach for Cost Optimal System Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    4. García, Lázaro & González, Daniel & García, Carlos & García, Laura & Brayner, Carlos, 2013. "Efficiency of the sulfur–iodine thermochemical water splitting process for hydrogen production based on ADS (accelerator driven system)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 469-477.
    5. George E. Halkos & Eleni-Christina Gkampoura, 2021. "Coping with Energy Poverty: Measurements, Drivers, Impacts, and Solutions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    6. Sethu Sundar Pethaiah & Kishor Kumar Sadasivuni & Arunkumar Jayakumar & Deepalekshmi Ponnamma & Chandra Sekhar Tiwary & Gangadharan Sasikumar, 2020. "Methanol Electrolysis for Hydrogen Production Using Polymer Electrolyte Membrane: A Mini-Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steven Jackson & Eivind Brodal, 2021. "Optimization of a Mixed Refrigerant Based H 2 Liquefaction Pre-Cooling Process and Estimate of Liquefaction Performance with Varying Ambient Temperature," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Patrick Mukumba & Shylet Y. Chivanga, 2023. "An Overview of Renewable Energy Technologies in the Eastern Cape Province in South Africa and the Rural Households’ Energy Poverty Coping Strategies," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Abdulrahman Joubi & Yutaro Akimoto & Keiichi Okajima, 2022. "A Production and Delivery Model of Hydrogen from Solar Thermal Energy in the United Arab Emirates," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Sebastián Mantilla & Diogo M. F. Santos, 2022. "Green and Blue Hydrogen Production: An Overview in Colombia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Shahzad, Umer & Gupta, Mansi & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Rao, Amar & Chopra, Ritika, 2022. "Resolving energy poverty for social change: Research directions and agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    6. Janusz Reichel & Agata Rudnicka & Błażej Socha, 2023. "Energy Poverty—Do Energy Companies Care? Study Results from European Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-15, September.
    7. George E. Halkos & Panagiotis-Stavros C. Aslanidis, 2023. "Addressing Multidimensional Energy Poverty Implications on Achieving Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-30, April.
    8. Cong Khai Dinh & Quang Thanh Ngo & Trung Thanh Nguyen, 2021. "Medium- and High-Tech Export and Renewable Energy Consumption: Non-Linear Evidence from the ASEAN Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Marta Postuła & Wojciech Chmielewski & Piotr Puczyński & Rafał Cieślik, 2021. "The Impact of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) on Energy Poverty and Unemployment in Selected European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Blanka Tundys & Agnieszka Bretyn & Maciej Urbaniak, 2021. "Energy Poverty and Sustainable Economic Development: An Exploration of Correlations and Interdependencies in European Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-25, November.
    11. Nicolai Lystbæk & Mikkel Gregersen & Hamid Reza Shaker, 2023. "Review of Energy Portfolio Optimization in Energy Markets Considering Flexibility of Power-to-X," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, March.
    12. Minsoo Choi & Wongwan Jung & Sanghyuk Lee & Taehwan Joung & Daejun Chang, 2021. "Thermal Efficiency and Economics of a Boil-Off Hydrogen Re-Liquefaction System Considering the Energy Efficiency Design Index for Liquid Hydrogen Carriers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    13. Huaquan Zhang & Yashuang Tang & Martinson Ankrah Twumasi & Abbas Ali Chandio & Lili Guo & Ruixin Wan & Shilei Pan & Yun Shen & Ghulam Raza Sargani, 2022. "The Effects of Ecological Public Welfare Jobs on the Usage of Clean Energy by Farmers: Evidence from Tibet Areas—China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, June.
    14. Favourate Y. Mpofu, 2022. "Green Taxes in Africa: Opportunities and Challenges for Environmental Protection, Sustainability, and the Attainment of Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-26, August.
    15. Laetitia Uwineza & Hyun-Goo Kim & Jan Kleissl & Chang Ki Kim, 2022. "Technical Control and Optimal Dispatch Strategy for a Hybrid Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    16. Cristina Hora & Florin Ciprian Dan & Nicolae Rancov & Gabriela Elena Badea & Calin Secui, 2022. "Main Trends and Research Directions in Hydrogen Generation Using Low Temperature Electrolysis: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    17. George Halkos & Eleni-Christina Gkampoura, 2023. "Assessing Fossil Fuels and Renewables’ Impact on Energy Poverty Conditions in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, January.
    18. Maria Portarapillo & Almerinda Di Benedetto, 2021. "Risk Assessment of the Large-Scale Hydrogen Storage in Salt Caverns," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-12, May.
    19. Yilmaz, Fatih & Selbaş, Reşat, 2017. "Thermodynamic performance assessment of solar based Sulfur-Iodine thermochemical cycle for hydrogen generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 520-529.
    20. Mohideen, Mohamedazeem M. & Subramanian, Balachandran & Sun, Jingyi & Ge, Jing & Guo, Han & Radhamani, Adiyodi Veettil & Ramakrishna, Seeram & Liu, Yong, 2023. "Techno-economic analysis of different shades of renewable and non-renewable energy-based hydrogen for fuel cell electric vehicles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:23:p:7955-:d:690311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.