IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v38y2010i1p141-150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of contingency analysis on the nodal prices in the day-ahead market

Author

Listed:
  • Murphy, Frederic H.
  • Mudrageda, Murthy
  • Soyster, Allen L.
  • Saric, Andrija T.
  • Stankovic, Aleksandar M.

Abstract

We look at the effect of modeling branch-outage contingencies on locational marginal prices. To model contingencies in the day-ahead auction, we formulate a two-stage stochastic program. Rather than follow the current practice of including a list of possible contingencies that must be satisfied, we incorporate a larger set of contingencies in the model and allow contingencies to result in load reductions/outages at a cost. The model can be used and interpreted in two ways. One is to look at the tradeoff between reliability and outage costs. Another is to consider the load losses resulting from a contingency to be consumer offers of load reductions in response to line outages as part of the day-ahead auction. In analyzing the model structure, we find that the prices in the model closer in definition to those currently used in the day-ahead auction do not maximize expected surplus because the day-ahead auction produces prices that assume shortages will never occur. This raises issues with the design of auctions with important stochastic elements in the market. We present results for a 68-node grid with 86 branches (lines and transformers) to illustrate how prices and expected values change as the costs of outages are varied.

Suggested Citation

  • Murphy, Frederic H. & Mudrageda, Murthy & Soyster, Allen L. & Saric, Andrija T. & Stankovic, Aleksandar M., 2010. "The effect of contingency analysis on the nodal prices in the day-ahead market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 141-150, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:38:y:2010:i:1:p:141-150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301-4215(09)00650-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harvey J. Greenberg, 1994. "How to Analyze the Results of Linear Programs—Part 4: Forcing Substructures," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 121-130, February.
    2. Suvrajeet Sen & Lihua Yu & Talat Genc, 2006. "A Stochastic Programming Approach to Power Portfolio Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 55-72, February.
    3. Harvey J. Greenberg, 1993. "How to Analyze the Results of Linear Programs—Part 2: Price Interpretation," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 97-114, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yilmaz, Hasan Ümitcan & Kimbrough, Steven O. & van Dinther, Clemens & Keles, Dogan, 2022. "Power-to-gas: Decarbonization of the European electricity system with synthetic methane," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    2. Raimund M. Kovacevic, 2019. "Valuation and pricing of electricity delivery contracts: the producer’s view," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 275(2), pages 421-460, April.
    3. Andreas Dietrich & Christian Furtwängler & Christoph Weber, "undated". "Thesenpapier: Managing combined power and heat portfolios in sequential spot power markets under uncertainty," EWL Working Papers 2003, University of Duisburg-Essen, Chair for Management Science and Energy Economics.
    4. Kettunen, Janne & Bunn, Derek W., 2016. "Risk induced resource dependency in capacity investments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 914-924.
    5. Zhouchun Huang & Qipeng P. Zheng & Andrew L. Liu, 2022. "A Nested Cross Decomposition Algorithm for Power System Capacity Expansion with Multiscale Uncertainties," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1919-1939, July.
    6. Yin, S. & Wang, J. & Li, Z. & Fang, X., 2021. "State-of-the-art short-term electricity market operation with solar generation: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    7. Ghaninejad, Mousa, 2020. "عرضه، تقاضا، و پیشنهاد قیمت در بازار برق ایران [Supply, Demand, and Bidding in Iran’s Electricity Market]," MPRA Paper 105340, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Qipeng Zheng & Jianhui Wang & Panos Pardalos & Yongpei Guan, 2013. "A decomposition approach to the two-stage stochastic unit commitment problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 387-410, November.
    9. Xin Shi & Alberto J. Lamadrid L. & Luis F. Zuluaga, 2021. "Revenue Adequate Prices for Chance-Constrained Electricity Markets with Variable Renewable Energy Sources," Papers 2105.01233, arXiv.org.
    10. Genc, Talat S., 2017. "The impact of lead time on capital investments," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 142-164.
    11. Richard E. Wendell, 2004. "Tolerance Sensitivity and Optimality Bounds in Linear Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(6), pages 797-803, June.
    12. Deng, Shi-Jie & Xu, Li, 2009. "Mean-risk efficient portfolio analysis of demand response and supply resources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1523-1529.
    13. Roy H. Kwon & J. Scott Rogers & Sheena Yau, 2006. "Stochastic programming models for replication of electricity forward contracts for industry," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(7), pages 713-726, October.
    14. Rocha, Paula & Kuhn, Daniel, 2012. "Multistage stochastic portfolio optimisation in deregulated electricity markets using linear decision rules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 397-408.
    15. Genc, Talat S. & De Giovanni, Pietro, 2018. "Optimal return and rebate mechanism in a closed-loop supply chain game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 661-681.
    16. Murthy Mudrageda & Frederic H. Murphy, 2008. "OR PRACTICE---An Economic Equilibrium Model of the Market for Marine Transportation Services in Petroleum Products," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(2), pages 278-285, April.
    17. Li, Gong & Shi, Jing & Qu, Xiuli, 2011. "Modeling methods for GenCo bidding strategy optimization in the liberalized electricity spot market–A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 4686-4700.
    18. Parpas, Panos & Webster, Mort, 2014. "A stochastic multiscale model for electricity generation capacity expansion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 359-374.
    19. Jiang, Ruiwei & Zhang, Muhong & Li, Guang & Guan, Yongpei, 2014. "Two-stage network constrained robust unit commitment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 751-762.
    20. Kovacevic, Raimund M. & Paraschiv, Florentina, 2012. "Medium-term Planning for Thermal Electricity Production," Working Papers on Finance 1220, University of St. Gallen, School of Finance.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:38:y:2010:i:1:p:141-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.