IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v160y2022ics0301421521005826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying greenhouse gas emissions from decommissioned oil and gas steel structures: Can current policy meet NetZero goals?

Author

Listed:
  • Davies, Abigail J.
  • Hastings, Astley

Abstract

To help achieve global aims to reach Net Zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, a clearly structured method for calculating emissions from decommissioning oil and gas structures is required. In order to understand the GHG consequences of recycling secondary steel from decommissioned structures, this paper presents a new methodology in decommissioning, based on the UN’s International Resource Panel (IRP)’s Value Retention method that combines life cycle assessment principles, the waste hierarchy and the circular economy to holistically calculate GHG emissions produced as a consequence of manufacturing primary and secondary steel, manufacturing a product from this steel and the associated transport emissions. The Value Retention Model presented here combines the concept of material value and product value to obtain realistic GHG emission calculations based on end-of-use and end-of-life scenarios, including recycling and reuse options. The results show that reusing a steel jacket structure in situ will retain 55,040 tCO2(eq) in GHG emissions, not including removal operations or transport emissions. New regulation is urgently required to update the current outdated emissions calculation guidelines, enable the provision of both realistic baseline emissions figures and to provide a mechanism for reporting ‘after operations’ figures.

Suggested Citation

  • Davies, Abigail J. & Hastings, Astley, 2022. "Quantifying greenhouse gas emissions from decommissioned oil and gas steel structures: Can current policy meet NetZero goals?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:160:y:2022:i:c:s0301421521005826
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421521005826
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112717?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lari Shanlang Tiewsoh & Jakub Jirásek & Martin Sivek, 2019. "Electricity Generation in India: Present State, Future Outlook and Policy Implications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Le Boulzec, Hugo & Delannoy, Louis & Andrieu, Baptiste & Verzier, François & Vidal, Olivier & Mathy, Sandrine, 2022. "Dynamic modeling of global fossil fuel infrastructure and materials needs: Overcoming a lack of available data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. King, Marcus & Jain, Anjali & Bhakar, Rohit & Mathur, Jyotirmay & Wang, Jihong, 2021. "Overview of current compressed air energy storage projects and analysis of the potential underground storage capacity in India and the UK," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    2. Mitavachan Hiremath & Peter Viebahn & Sascha Samadi, 2021. "An Integrated Comparative Assessment of Coal-Based Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Vis-à-Vis Renewable Energies in India’s Low Carbon Electricity Transition Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-28, January.
    3. Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Eapen, Leena Mary & Nair, Sthanu R, 2021. "Electricity consumption and economic growth at the state and sectoral level in India: Evidence using heterogeneous panel data methods," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. Gopinathan Satheedevi, Amrutha & Sharma, Abhibhav & Dhar, Murali, 2022. "How do the anthropogenic factors affect the environment in India? Evidence from the urban provinces," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    5. Sivek, Martin & Jirásek, Jakub & Kavina, Pavel & Vojnarová, Markéta & Kurková, Tereza & Bašová, Andrea, 2020. "Divorce after hundreds of years of marriage: Prospects for coal mining in the Czech Republic with regard to the European Union," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    6. Vishnu S Prabhu & Shraddha Shrivastava & Kakali Mukhopadhyay, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment of Solar Photovoltaic in India: A Circular Economy Approach," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    7. Jain, A. & Yamujala, S. & Gaur, A. & Das, P. & Bhakar, R. & Mathur, J., 2023. "Power sector decarbonization planning considering renewable resource variability and system operational constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    8. Ameena Saad Al-Sumaiti & Abdollah Kavousi-Fard & Magdy Salama & Motahareh Pourbehzadi & Srikanth Reddy & Muhammad Babar Rasheed, 2020. "Economic Assessment of Distributed Generation Technologies: A Feasibility Study and Comparison with the Literature," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-28, June.
    9. Akram, Vaseem & Sahoo, Pradipta Kumar & Jangam, Bhushan Praveen, 2019. "Do shocks to electricity consumption revert to its equilibrium? Evidence from Indian states," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:160:y:2022:i:c:s0301421521005826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.