IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v303y2022i2p593-601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On permutation schedules for two-machine flow shops with buffer constraints and constant processing times on one machine

Author

Listed:
  • Geser, Philine
  • Le, Hoang Thanh
  • Hartmann, Tom
  • Middendorf, Martin

Abstract

The two-machine flow shop problem with buffers where one of the machines has constant processing times is studied. It is investigated if optimal permutation schedules exist, i.e., schedules which minimize the makespan within the set of all schedules and where the job sequence on both machines is the same. Two standard buffer models (an intermediate buffer that a job occupies between its processing on the two machines and a spanning buffer which is occupied by a job over all of its processing steps) are considered for two types of buffer usage: i) all jobs occupy the same buffer amount and ii) for each job the occupied buffer amount equals its processing time on the machine with non-constant times. For (i) and both buffer models, it is shown that the set of optimal schedules always contains at least one permutation schedule. For (ii) the existence of optimal permutation schedules is only guaranteed for instances with n jobs for all n≤6 (spanning buffer) and for all n≤3 (intermediate buffer). For each n>6 (spanning buffer) and each n>3 (intermediate buffer) exists an instance which does not have an optimal permutation schedule. For (ii) and both buffer models, an upper bound and a lower bound for ratio between the makespan of a best permutation schedule and the makespan of an optimal schedule is given. It is also shown for (ii) and both buffer models that in general it is NP-hard to decide if an optimal permutation schedule exists.

Suggested Citation

  • Geser, Philine & Le, Hoang Thanh & Hartmann, Tom & Middendorf, Martin, 2022. "On permutation schedules for two-machine flow shops with buffer constraints and constant processing times on one machine," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 593-601.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:303:y:2022:i:2:p:593-601
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.03.024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221722002466
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.03.024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ghaith Rabadi & Mohamed Kais Msakni & Elkin Rodriguez-Velasquez & William Alvarez-Bermudez, 2019. "New characteristics of optimal solutions for the two-machine flowshop problem with unlimited buffers," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(6), pages 962-973, June.
    2. Rossit, Daniel Alejandro & Tohmé, Fernando & Frutos, Mariano, 2018. "The Non-Permutation Flow-Shop scheduling problem: A literature review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 143-153.
    3. Rossit, Daniel A. & Vásquez, Óscar C. & Tohmé, Fernando & Frutos, Mariano & Safe, Martín D., 2021. "A combinatorial analysis of the permutation and non-permutation flow shop scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(3), pages 841-854.
    4. P. C. Gilmore & R. E. Gomory, 1964. "Sequencing a One State-Variable Machine: A Solvable Case of the Traveling Salesman Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(5), pages 655-679, October.
    5. Yakov Zinder & Alexandr Kononov & Joey Fung, 2021. "A 5-parameter complexity classification of the two-stage flow shop scheduling problem with job dependent storage requirements," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 276-309, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin Qian & Haiyan Han, 2022. "Improved algorithms for proportionate flow shop scheduling with due-window assignment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(1), pages 249-258, February.
    2. Burkard, Rainer E., 2007. "Monge properties, discrete convexity and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(1), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Waldherr, Stefan & Knust, Sigrid, 2017. "Decomposition algorithms for synchronous flow shop problems with additional resources and setup times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 847-863.
    4. Lin, Shih-Wei & Ying, Kuo-Ching, 2013. "Minimizing makespan in a blocking flowshop using a revised artificial immune system algorithm," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 383-389.
    5. Sterna, Małgorzata, 2021. "Late and early work scheduling: A survey," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    6. Lin, Shih-Wei & Ying, Kuo-Ching, 2016. "Optimization of makespan for no-wait flowshop scheduling problems using efficient matheuristics," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 115-125.
    7. Smutnicki, Czeslaw & Pempera, Jaroslaw & Bocewicz, Grzegorz & Banaszak, Zbigniew, 2022. "Cyclic flow-shop scheduling with no-wait constraints and missing operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 39-49.
    8. Panwalkar, S.S. & Koulamas, Christos, 2014. "The two-machine no-wait general and proportionate open shop makespan problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(2), pages 471-475.
    9. Allahverdi, Ali & Gupta, Jatinder N. D. & Aldowaisan, Tariq, 1999. "A review of scheduling research involving setup considerations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 219-239, April.
    10. Batur, G. Didem & Karasan, Oya Ekin & Akturk, M. Selim, 2012. "Multiple part-type scheduling in flexible robotic cells," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 726-740.
    11. Delorme, Xavier & Dolgui, Alexandre & Kovalev, Sergey & Kovalyov, Mikhail Y., 2019. "Minimizing the number of workers in a paced mixed-model assembly line," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 188-194.
    12. Kravchenko, Svetlana A., 1998. "A polynomial algorithm for a two-machine no-wait job-shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 101-107, April.
    13. Khatami, Mostafa & Salehipour, Amir & Cheng, T.C.E., 2020. "Coupled task scheduling with exact delays: Literature review and models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 19-39.
    14. Kalczynski, Pawel J. & Kamburowski, Jerzy, 2009. "An empirical analysis of the optimality rate of flow shop heuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 93-101, October.
    15. Martinez, S. & Dauzere-Peres, S. & Gueret, C. & Mati, Y. & Sauer, N., 2006. "Complexity of flowshop scheduling problems with a new blocking constraint," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(3), pages 855-864, March.
    16. A.J. Scott, 1969. "Combinatorial Programming and the Planning of Urban and Regional Systems," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 1(2), pages 125-142, December.
    17. Alexander Kononov & Julia Memar & Yakov Zinder, 2022. "On a borderline between the NP-hard and polynomial-time solvable cases of the flow shop with job-dependent storage requirements," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 83(3), pages 445-456, July.
    18. Mohamed Amine Mkadem & Aziz Moukrim & Mehdi Serairi, 2021. "Exact method for the two-machine flow-shop problem with time delays," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 298(1), pages 375-406, March.
    19. Zhang, Zhe & Gong, Xue & Song, Xiaoling & Yin, Yong & Lev, Benjamin & Chen, Jie, 2022. "A column generation-based exact solution method for seru scheduling problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    20. Çela, Eranda & Deineko, Vladimir & Woeginger, Gerhard J., 2012. "The x-and-y-axes travelling salesman problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 333-345.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:303:y:2022:i:2:p:593-601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.