IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v292y2021i3p953-966.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conic programming models for production planning with clearing functions: Formulations and duality

Author

Listed:
  • Gopalswamy, Karthick
  • Uzsoy, Reha

Abstract

Concave clearing functions that model the expected throughput of a production resource as a function of its planned workload have yielded promising results when used in production planning models. The most common of these models take the form of linear programs (LPs) obtained by piecewise linearization of the clearing function constraints, leading to large formulations and inaccurate estimates of dual prices for resources. We show that several clearing function forms considered in the literature to date can be reformulated as conic programs (CPs), for which efficient solution methods and an elegant duality theory analogous to that for linear programming exist. We derive expressions for the optimal values of the dual variables and present computational experiments showing that the dual prices obtained from the CP formulation are more accurate than those obtained from the piecewise linearized LP models. In addition, the CP solution outperforms the LP solutions with respect to nervousness.

Suggested Citation

  • Gopalswamy, Karthick & Uzsoy, Reha, 2021. "Conic programming models for production planning with clearing functions: Formulations and duality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 953-966.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:292:y:2021:i:3:p:953-966
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722172030998X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Spitter, J. M. & Hurkens, C. A. J. & de Kok, A. G. & Lenstra, J. K. & Negenman, E. G., 2005. "Linear programming models with planned lead times for supply chain operations planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(3), pages 706-720, June.
    2. Hubert Missbauer & Reha Uzsoy, 2020. "Production Planning with Capacitated Resources and Congestion," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-1-0716-0354-3, November.
    3. Ali Kefeli & Reha Uzsoy, 2016. "Identifying potential bottlenecks in production systems using dual prices from a mathematical programming model," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 2000-2018, April.
    4. Jakob Asmundsson & Ronald L. Rardin & Can Hulusi Turkseven & Reha Uzsoy, 2009. "Production planning with resources subject to congestion," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 142-157, March.
    5. Missbauer, Hubert, 2020. "Order release planning by iterative simulation and linear programming: Theoretical foundation and analysis of its shortcomings," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 280(2), pages 495-507.
    6. Srinivasan, A. & Carey, M. & Morton, T.E., 1988. "Resource Pricing And Aggregate Scheduling In Manufacturing Systems," GSIA Working Papers 88-89-58, Carnegie Mellon University, Tepper School of Business.
    7. Byrne, M. D. & Bakir, M. A., 1999. "Production planning using a hybrid simulation - analytical approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 305-311, March.
    8. Haeussler, Stefan & Missbauer, Hubert, 2014. "Empirical validation of meta-models of work centres in order release planning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 102-116.
    9. Kim, Bokang & Kim, Sooyoung, 2001. "Extended model for a hybrid production planning approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 165-173, September.
    10. Kefeli, Ali & Uzsoy, Reha & Fathi, Yahya & Kay, Michael, 2011. "Using a mathematical programming model to examine the marginal price of capacitated resources," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 383-391, May.
    11. Stefan Voß & David L. Woodruff, 2006. "Introduction to Computational Optimization Models for Production Planning in a Supply Chain," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-3-540-29879-3, November.
    12. Byrne, M.D. & Hossain, M.M., 2005. "Production planning: An improved hybrid approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 225-229, January.
    13. Aharon Ben-Tal & Arkadi Nemirovski, 2001. "On Polyhedral Approximations of the Second-Order Cone," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 193-205, May.
    14. Erinc Albey & Ümit Bilge & Reha Uzsoy, 2017. "Multi-dimensional clearing functions for aggregate capacity modelling in multi-stage production systems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(14), pages 4164-4179, July.
    15. Steven T. Hackman & Robert C. Leachman, 1989. "A General Framework for Modeling Production," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 478-495, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manda, A.B. & Uzsoy, Reha, 2021. "Managing product transitions with learning and congestion effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manda, A.B. & Uzsoy, Reha, 2021. "Managing product transitions with learning and congestion effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    2. Ghadimi, Foad & Aouam, Tarik & Haeussler, Stefan & Uzsoy, Reha, 2022. "Integrated and hierarchical systems for coordinating order acceptance and release planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1277-1289.
    3. Haeussler, S. & Stampfer, C. & Missbauer, H., 2020. "Comparison of two optimization based order release models with fixed and variable lead times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    4. Jakob Asmundsson & Ronald L. Rardin & Can Hulusi Turkseven & Reha Uzsoy, 2009. "Production planning with resources subject to congestion," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 142-157, March.
    5. K. Taghizadeh & M. Bagherpour & I. Mahdavi, 2011. "An interactive fuzzy goal programming approach for multi-period multi-product production planning problem," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 393-410, December.
    6. Bilge Bilgen & Yelda Çelebi, 2013. "Integrated production scheduling and distribution planning in dairy supply chain by hybrid modelling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 55-82, December.
    7. Julia Pahl & Stefan Voß & David Woodruff, 2007. "Production planning with load dependent lead times: an update of research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 297-345, September.
    8. Missbauer, Hubert, 2011. "Order release planning with clearing functions: A queueing-theoretical analysis of the clearing function concept," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 399-406, May.
    9. Tian, Feng & Willems, Sean P. & Kempf, Karl G., 2011. "An iterative approach to item-level tactical production and inventory planning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 439-450, September.
    10. Diaz, Juan Esteban & Handl, Julia & Xu, Dong-Ling, 2018. "Integrating meta-heuristics, simulation and exact techniques for production planning of a failure-prone manufacturing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 976-989.
    11. Vasant, Pandian M. & Barsoum, Nader N. & Bhattacharya, Arijit, 2008. "Possibilistic optimization in planning decision of construction industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 664-675, February.
    12. Kefeli, Ali & Uzsoy, Reha & Fathi, Yahya & Kay, Michael, 2011. "Using a mathematical programming model to examine the marginal price of capacitated resources," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 383-391, May.
    13. Phillip O. Kriett & Sebastian Eirich & Martin Grunow, 2017. "Cycle time-oriented mid-term production planning for semiconductor wafer fabrication," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 4662-4679, August.
    14. Pürgstaller, Peter & Missbauer, Hubert, 2012. "Rule-based vs. optimisation-based order release in workload control: A simulation study of a MTO manufacturer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 670-680.
    15. de Kruijff, Joost T. & Hurkens, Cor A.J. & de Kok, Ton G., 2018. "Integer programming models for mid-term production planning for high-tech low-volume supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 984-997.
    16. de Sampaio, Raimundo J.B. & Wollmann, Rafael R.G. & Vieira, Paula F.G., 2017. "A flexible production planning for rolling-horizons," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 31-36.
    17. Beraudy, Sébastien & Absi, Nabil & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane, 2022. "Timed route approaches for large multi-product multi-step capacitated production planning problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 602-614.
    18. Tien-Fu Liang, 2012. "Integrated manufacturing/distribution planning decisions with multiple imprecise goals in an uncertain environment," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 137-153, January.
    19. Aouam, Tarik & Brahimi, Nadjib, 2013. "Integrated production planning and order acceptance under uncertainty: A robust optimization approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 504-515.
    20. Missbauer, Hubert, 2009. "Models of the transient behaviour of production units to optimize the aggregate material flow," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 387-397, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:292:y:2021:i:3:p:953-966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.