IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v278y2019i3p855-868.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study of general and security Stackelberg game formulations

Author

Listed:
  • Casorrán, Carlos
  • Fortz, Bernard
  • Labbé, Martine
  • Ordóñez, Fernando

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze different mathematical formulations for general Stackelberg games (GSGs) and Stackelberg security games (SSGs). We consider GSGs in which a single leader commits to a utility maximizing strategy knowing that p possible followers optimize their own utility taking the leader’s strategy into account. SSGs are a type of GSG that arise in security applications where the strategies of the leader consist of protecting a subset of targets and the strategies of the p followers consist of attacking a single target. We compare existing mixed integer linear programming (MILP) formulations for GSGs, ranking them according to the tightness of their linear programming (LP) relaxations. We show that SSG formulations are projections of GSG formulations and exploit this link to derive a new SSG MILP formulation that (i) has the tightest LP relaxation known among SSG MILP formulations and (ii) has an LP relaxation that coincides with the convex hull of feasible solutions in the case of a single follower. We present computational experiments empirically comparing the difficulty of solving the formulations in the general and security settings. The new SSG MILP formulation remains computationally efficient as problem size increases.

Suggested Citation

  • Casorrán, Carlos & Fortz, Bernard & Labbé, Martine & Ordóñez, Fernando, 2019. "A study of general and security Stackelberg game formulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 855-868.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:278:y:2019:i:3:p:855-868
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.05.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722171930414X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.05.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martine Labbé & Patrice Marcotte & Gilles Savard, 1998. "A Bilevel Model of Taxation and Its Application to Optimal Highway Pricing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(12-Part-1), pages 1608-1622, December.
    2. Karwowski, Jan & Mańdziuk, Jacek, 2019. "A Monte Carlo Tree Search approach to finding efficient patrolling schemes on graphs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 255-268.
    3. Jiang, J. & Liu, X., 2018. "Multi-objective Stackelberg game model for water supply networks against interdictions with incomplete information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 920-933.
    4. Manish Jain & Jason Tsai & James Pita & Christopher Kiekintveld & Shyamsunder Rathi & Milind Tambe & Fernando Ordóñez, 2010. "Software Assistants for Randomized Patrol Planning for the LAX Airport Police and the Federal Air Marshal Service," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 267-290, August.
    5. J. Cole Smith & Churlzu Lim, 2008. "Algorithms for Network Interdiction and Fortification Games," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Altannar Chinchuluun & Panos M. Pardalos & Athanasios Migdalas & Leonidas Pitsoulis (ed.), Pareto Optimality, Game Theory And Equilibria, pages 609-644, Springer.
    6. Jerome Bracken & James T. McGill, 1973. "Mathematical Programs with Optimization Problems in the Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 37-44, February.
    7. Li, Yapeng & Qiao, Shun & Deng, Ye & Wu, Jun, 2019. "Stackelberg game in critical infrastructures from a network science perspective," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 521(C), pages 705-714.
    8. Martine Labbé & Alessia Violin, 2016. "Bilevel programming and price setting problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(1), pages 141-169, May.
    9. Fischetti, Matteo & Monaci, Michele & Sinnl, Markus, 2018. "A dynamic reformulation heuristic for Generalized Interdiction Problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 40-51.
    10. Heinrich von Stackelberg, 2011. "Market Structure and Equilibrium," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-642-12586-7, November.
    11. Alan W. McMasters & Thomas M. Mustin, 1970. "Optimal interdiction of a supply network," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 261-268, September.
    12. Benoît Colson & Patrice Marcotte & Gilles Savard, 2007. "An overview of bilevel optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 235-256, September.
    13. John C. Harsanyi & Reinhard Selten, 1972. "A Generalized Nash Solution for Two-Person Bargaining Games with Incomplete Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(5-Part-2), pages 80-106, January.
    14. Matteo Fischetti & Ivana Ljubić & Michele Monaci & Markus Sinnl, 2019. "Interdiction Games and Monotonicity, with Application to Knapsack Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 390-410, April.
    15. Gerald Brown & Matthew Carlyle & Javier Salmerón & Kevin Wood, 2006. "Defending Critical Infrastructure," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 530-544, December.
    16. Lawrence V. Snyder & Zümbül Atan & Peng Peng & Ying Rong & Amanda J. Schmitt & Burcu Sinsoysal, 2016. "OR/MS models for supply chain disruptions: a review," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 89-109, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muñoz, M.A. & Pineda, S. & Morales, J.M., 2022. "A bilevel framework for decision-making under uncertainty with contextual information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beck, Yasmine & Ljubić, Ivana & Schmidt, Martin, 2023. "A survey on bilevel optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 401-426.
    2. Claudio Contardo & Jorge A. Sefair, 2022. "A Progressive Approximation Approach for the Exact Solution of Sparse Large-Scale Binary Interdiction Games," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 890-908, March.
    3. Juan S. Borrero & Oleg A. Prokopyev & Denis Sauré, 2019. "Sequential Interdiction with Incomplete Information and Learning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 72-89, January.
    4. Matteo Fischetti & Ivana Ljubić & Michele Monaci & Markus Sinnl, 2017. "A New General-Purpose Algorithm for Mixed-Integer Bilevel Linear Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1615-1637, December.
    5. Leitner, Markus & Ljubić, Ivana & Monaci, Michele & Sinnl, Markus & Tanınmış, Kübra, 2023. "An exact method for binary fortification games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1026-1039.
    6. Yan, Xihong & Ren, Xiaorong & Nie, Xiaofeng, 2022. "A budget allocation model for domestic airport network protection," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    7. Ketkov, Sergey S. & Prokopyev, Oleg A., 2020. "On greedy and strategic evaders in sequential interdiction settings with incomplete information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Smith, J. Cole & Song, Yongjia, 2020. "A survey of network interdiction models and algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 797-811.
    9. Acuna, Jorge A. & Zayas-Castro, Jose L. & Feijoo, Felipe, 2022. "A bilevel Nash-in-Nash model for hospital mergers: A key to affordable care," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    10. Christine Tawfik & Sabine Limbourg, 2018. "Pricing Problems in Intermodal Freight Transport: Research Overview and Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Martine Labbé & Alessia Violin, 2016. "Bilevel programming and price setting problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(1), pages 141-169, May.
    12. Gang Du & Yi Xia & Roger J. Jiao & Xiaojie Liu, 2019. "Leader-follower joint optimization problems in product family design," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 1387-1405, March.
    13. Cerulli, Martina & Serra, Domenico & Sorgente, Carmine & Archetti, Claudia & Ljubić, Ivana, 2023. "Mathematical programming formulations for the Collapsed k-Core Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(1), pages 56-72.
    14. Chan Y. Han & Brian J. Lunday & Matthew J. Robbins, 2016. "A Game Theoretic Model for the Optimal Location of Integrated Air Defense System Missile Batteries," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 405-416, August.
    15. Lei Fang & Hecheng Li, 2013. "Lower bound of cost efficiency measure in DEA with incomplete price information," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 219-226, October.
    16. Thomas Kleinert & Martin Schmidt, 2023. "Why there is no need to use a big-M in linear bilevel optimization: a computational study of two ready-to-use approaches," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, December.
    17. Rebeca Ramirez Acosta & Chathura Wanigasekara & Emilie Frost & Tobias Brandt & Sebastian Lehnhoff & Christof Büskens, 2023. "Integration of Intelligent Neighbourhood Grids to the German Distribution Grid: A Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, May.
    18. Losada, Chaya & Scaparra, M. Paola & O’Hanley, Jesse R., 2012. "Optimizing system resilience: A facility protection model with recovery time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(3), pages 519-530.
    19. Chaya Losada & M. Scaparra & Richard Church & Mark Daskin, 2012. "The stochastic interdiction median problem with disruption intensity levels," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 345-365, December.
    20. Bo Zeng, 2020. "A Practical Scheme to Compute the Pessimistic Bilevel Optimization Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1128-1142, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:278:y:2019:i:3:p:855-868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.