IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v269y2018i3p1027-1040.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the robustness of the consumer homogeneity assumption with respect to the discount factor for remanufactured products

Author

Listed:
  • Kleber, Rainer
  • Reimann, Marc
  • Souza, Gilvan C.
  • Zhang, Weihua

Abstract

The strategic closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) literature makes the assumption that a consumer’s willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a remanufactured product is a fraction of his/her WTP for the corresponding new product, and this fraction, called discount factor, is assumed to be constant among consumers. Recent empirical research challenges this assumption, by showing that there is considerable variability in discount factors among consumers. This paper considers a complex model in the CLSC literature: strategic remanufacturing under quality choice, and compares its solution under constant discount factors with the solution that assumes a probability distribution for the discount factors (which is analytically intractable and must be obtained numerically). We consider quality choice and remanufacturing for both monopoly and competitive cases. Overall, we find remarkable consistency between the results of the constant and variable discount factor models. Thus, we make a convincing argument that the constant discount factor assumption is robust and can be used due to its tractability.

Suggested Citation

  • Kleber, Rainer & Reimann, Marc & Souza, Gilvan C. & Zhang, Weihua, 2018. "On the robustness of the consumer homogeneity assumption with respect to the discount factor for remanufactured products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 1027-1040.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:269:y:2018:i:3:p:1027-1040
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221718302029
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Belleflamme,Paul & Peitz,Martin, 2015. "Industrial Organization," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107687899, January.
    2. Ravi Subramanian & Ramanath Subramanyam, 2012. "Key Factors in the Market for Remanufactured Products," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 315-326, April.
    3. Atalay Atasu & Miklos Sarvary & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2008. "Remanufacturing as a Marketing Strategy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(10), pages 1731-1746, October.
    4. Geraldo Ferrer & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2006. "Managing New and Remanufactured Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 15-26, January.
    5. Laurens G. Debo & L. Beril Toktay & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2005. "Market Segmentation and Product Technology Selection for Remanufacturable Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(8), pages 1193-1205, August.
    6. Mussa, Michael & Rosen, Sherwin, 1978. "Monopoly and product quality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 301-317, August.
    7. Vishal V. Agrawal & Atalay Atasu & Koert van Ittersum, 2015. "Remanufacturing, Third-Party Competition, and Consumers' Perceived Value of New Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 60-72, January.
    8. K. Sridhar Moorthy, 1988. "Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 141-168.
    9. James D. Abbey & Rainer Kleber & Gilvan C. Souza & Guido Voigt, 2017. "The Role of Perceived Quality Risk in Pricing Remanufactured Products," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(1), pages 100-115, January.
    10. James D. Abbey & Margaret G. Meloy & V. Daniel R. Guide Jr. & Selin Atalay, 2015. "Remanufactured Products in Closed-Loop Supply Chains for Consumer Goods," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(3), pages 488-503, March.
    11. Nektarios Oraiopoulos & Mark E. Ferguson & L. Beril Toktay, 2012. "Relicensing as a Secondary Market Strategy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 1022-1037, May.
    12. V. Daniel R. Guide, Jr. & Ruud H. Teunter & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2003. "Matching Demand and Supply to Maximize Profits from Remanufacturing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 5(4), pages 303-316, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patricia van Loon & Luk N. Van Wassenhove & Ales Mihelic, 2022. "Designing a circular business strategy: 7 years of evolution at a large washing machine manufacturer," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1030-1041, March.
    2. Minjung Kwak, 2021. "Monte Carlo Simulation of the Effect of Heterogeneous Too-Cheap Prices on the Average Price Preference for Remanufactured Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-11, August.
    3. Yang, Feng & Wang, Manman & Ang, Sheng, 2021. "Optimal remanufacturing decisions in supply chains considering consumers’ anticipated regret and power structures," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    4. Ehsan Shekarian & Simme Douwe Flapper, 2021. "Analyzing the Structure of Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Game Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    5. Lijun Meng & Qiang Qiang & Zuqing Huang & Baoyou Zhang & Yuxiang Yang, 2020. "Optimal Pricing Strategy and Government Consumption Subsidy Policy in Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Third-Party Remanufacturer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-29, March.
    6. Du, Hang & Wei, Lai & Zhu, Qinghua, 2023. "Competition of consumables’ original brand manufacturers and remanufacturers considering the entry of compatible manufacturers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 679-692.
    7. Qiao, Haike & Su, Qin, 2021. "Distribution channel and licensing strategy choice considering consumer online reviews in a closed-loop supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. Zhixin Chen & Shijian Hong & Xiang Ji & Ruixia Shi & Jie Wu, 2022. "Refurbished products and supply chain incentives," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 310(1), pages 27-47, March.
    9. Borenich, Andrea & Dickbauer, Yanick & Reimann, Marc & Souza, Gilvan C., 2020. "Should a manufacturer sell refurbished returns on the secondary market to incentivize retailers to reduce consumer returns?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 569-579.
    10. Zhou, Yu & Xiong, Yu & Jin, Minyue, 2021. "Less is more: Consumer education in a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    11. Wei He & Lan Liang & Kai Wang, 2020. "Economic and Environmental Implications of Quality Choice under Remanufacturing Outsourcing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Qin & Meng, Chao & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2021. "Remanufacturing authorization strategy for competition among OEM, authorized remanufacturer, and unauthorized remanufacturer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    2. Borenich, Andrea & Dickbauer, Yanick & Reimann, Marc & Souza, Gilvan C., 2020. "Should a manufacturer sell refurbished returns on the secondary market to incentivize retailers to reduce consumer returns?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 569-579.
    3. Kleber, Rainer & Reimann, Marc & Souza, Gilvan C. & Zhang, Weihua, 2020. "Two-sided competition with vertical differentiation in both acquisition and sales in remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 572-587.
    4. Kleber, Rainer & Quariguasi Frota Neto, João & Reimann, Marc, 2020. "Proprietary parts as a secondary market strategy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 929-941.
    5. Zhou, Qin & Meng, Chao & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2020. "The impact of secondary market competition on refurbishing authorization strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    6. Ahmed Timoumi & Narendra Singh & Subodha Kumar, 2021. "Is Your Retailer a Friend or Foe: When Should the Manufacturer Allow Its Retailer to Refurbish?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(9), pages 2814-2839, September.
    7. Xue, Dongmei & Teunter, Ruud H. & Zhu, Stuart X. & Zhou, Weihua, 2021. "Entering the high-end market by collecting and remanufacturing a competitor’s high-end cores," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Ying Wu & Youwei Li, 2022. "Competition or Authorization—Manufacturers’ Choice of Remanufacturing Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, October.
    9. Tianqin Shi & Dilip Chhajed & Zhixi Wan & Yunchuan Liu, 2020. "Distribution Channel Choice and Divisional Conflict in Remanufacturing Operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(7), pages 1702-1719, July.
    10. Cheng-Han Wu, 2021. "Production-quality policy for a make-from-stock remanufacturing system," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 425-456, June.
    11. Qiao, Haike & Su, Qin, 2021. "Distribution channel and licensing strategy choice considering consumer online reviews in a closed-loop supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    12. Cetin, Can Baris & Zaccour, Georges, 2023. "Remanufacturing with innovative features: A strategic analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 655-669.
    13. Zu-Jun Ma & Qin Zhou & Ying Dai & Gao-Feng Guan, 2018. "To License or Not to License Remanufacturing Business?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, January.
    14. Ma, Peng & Gong, Yeming & Mirchandani, Prakash, 2020. "Trade-in for remanufactured products: Pricing with double reference effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    15. Huang, Yanting & Wang, Zongjun, 2017. "Information sharing in a closed-loop supply chain with technology licensing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 113-127.
    16. He, Qidong & Wang, Nengmin & Browning, Tyson R. & Jiang, Bin, 2022. "Competitive collection with convenience-perceived customers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 239-254.
    17. Phantratanamongkol, Supanan & Casalin, Fabrizio & Pang, Gu & Sanderson, Joseph, 2018. "The price-volume relationship for new and remanufactured smartphones," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 78-94.
    18. Nektarios Oraiopoulos & Mark E. Ferguson & L. Beril Toktay, 2012. "Relicensing as a Secondary Market Strategy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 1022-1037, May.
    19. Liu, Zhuojun & Chen, Jing & Diallo, Claver, 2018. "Optimal production and pricing strategies for a remanufacturing firm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 290-315.
    20. Liao, Haolan & Zhang, Qingyu & Shen, Neng & Nie, Yongyou & Li, Lu, 2021. "Coordination between forward and reverse production streams for maximum profitability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:269:y:2018:i:3:p:1027-1040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.