IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v224y2013i3p449-457.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On accuracy, robustness and tolerances in vector Boolean optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Nikulin, Y.
  • Karelkina, O.
  • Mäkelä, M.M.

Abstract

A Boolean programming problem with a finite number of alternatives where initial coefficients (costs) of linear payoff functions are subject to perturbations is considered. We define robust solution as a feasible solution which for a given set of realizations of uncertain parameters guarantees the minimum value of the worst-case relative regret among all feasible solutions. For the Pareto optimality principle, an appropriate definition of the worst-case relative regret is specified. It is shown that this definition is closely related to the concept of accuracy function being recently intensively studied in the literature. We also present the concept of robustness tolerances of a single cost vector. The tolerance is defined as the maximum level of perturbation of the cost vector which does not destroy the solution robustness. We present formulae allowing the calculation of the robustness tolerance obtained for some initial costs. The results are illustrated with several numerical examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikulin, Y. & Karelkina, O. & Mäkelä, M.M., 2013. "On accuracy, robustness and tolerances in vector Boolean optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(3), pages 449-457.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:224:y:2013:i:3:p:449-457
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.09.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221712006820
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.09.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nikulin, Yury & Mäkelä, Marko M., 2010. "Stability and accuracy functions for a multicriteria Boolean linear programming problem with parameterized principle of optimality "from Condorcet to Pareto"," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1497-1505, December.
    2. Yury Nikulin, 2009. "Stability and accuracy functions in a coalition game with bans, linear payoffs and antagonistic strategies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 25-35, November.
    3. Montemanni, R. & Gambardella, L. M., 2005. "A branch and bound algorithm for the robust spanning tree problem with interval data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(3), pages 771-779, March.
    4. Zielinski, Pawel, 2004. "The computational complexity of the relative robust shortest path problem with interval data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(3), pages 570-576, November.
    5. ,, 2000. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 287-299, April.
    6. Marek Libura & Yury Nikulin, 2006. "Stability and accuracy functions in multicriteria linear combinatorial optimization problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 255-267, October.
    7. Kasperski, Adam & Zielinski, Pawel, 2010. "Minmax regret approach and optimality evaluation in combinatorial optimization problems with interval and fuzzy weights," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 680-687, February.
    8. John M. Mulvey & Robert J. Vanderbei & Stavros A. Zenios, 1995. "Robust Optimization of Large-Scale Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 264-281, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Korotkov, Vladimir & Wu, Desheng, 2021. "Benchmarking project portfolios using optimality thresholds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Korotkov, Vladimir & Wu, Desheng, 2020. "Evaluating the quality of solutions in project portfolio selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikulin, Yury & Mäkelä, Marko M., 2010. "Stability and accuracy functions for a multicriteria Boolean linear programming problem with parameterized principle of optimality "from Condorcet to Pareto"," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1497-1505, December.
    2. Nikulin, Yury, 2005. "Simulated annealing algorithm for the robust spanning tree problem," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 591, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    3. Nikulin, Yury, 2006. "Robustness in combinatorial optimization and scheduling theory: An extended annotated bibliography," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 606, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    4. Korotkov, Vladimir & Wu, Desheng, 2020. "Evaluating the quality of solutions in project portfolio selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Aissi, Hassene & Bazgan, Cristina & Vanderpooten, Daniel, 2009. "Min-max and min-max regret versions of combinatorial optimization problems: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 427-438, September.
    6. Chassein, André & Goerigk, Marc, 2018. "Compromise solutions for robust combinatorial optimization with variable-sized uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 544-555.
    7. Antonio G. Martín & Manuel Díaz-Madroñero & Josefa Mula, 2020. "Master production schedule using robust optimization approaches in an automobile second-tier supplier," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(1), pages 143-166, March.
    8. Hanks, Robert W. & Weir, Jeffery D. & Lunday, Brian J., 2017. "Robust goal programming using different robustness echelons via norm-based and ellipsoidal uncertainty sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 636-646.
    9. Mohsen Jalalimajidi & SM Seyedhosseini & Ahmad Makui & Masoud Babakhani, 2018. "Developing a comprehensive model for new energy replacement in the country’s development program using a robust optimization approach," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(6), pages 868-890, September.
    10. Kalaı¨, Rim & Lamboray, Claude & Vanderpooten, Daniel, 2012. "Lexicographic α-robustness: An alternative to min–max criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 722-728.
    11. Conde, Eduardo, 2012. "On a constant factor approximation for minmax regret problems using a symmetry point scenario," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(2), pages 452-457.
    12. Bastian, Nathaniel D. & Lunday, Brian J. & Fisher, Christopher B. & Hall, Andrew O., 2020. "Models and methods for workforce planning under uncertainty: Optimizing U.S. Army cyber branch readiness and manning," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    13. Mavrotas, George & Figueira, José Rui & Siskos, Eleftherios, 2015. "Robustness analysis methodology for multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems and application to project selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 142-155.
    14. Byung Chung & Tao Yao & Chi Xie & Andreas Thorsen, 2011. "Robust Optimization Model for a Dynamic Network Design Problem Under Demand Uncertainty," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 371-389, June.
    15. Donya Rahmani & Arash Zandi & Sara Behdad & Arezou Entezaminia, 2021. "A light robust model for aggregate production planning with consideration of environmental impacts of machines," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 273-297, March.
    16. Nicoletti, Jack & Ning, Chao & You, Fengqi, 2019. "Incorporating agricultural waste-to-energy pathways into biomass product and process network through data-driven nonlinear adaptive robust optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 556-571.
    17. Tao Yao & Supreet Mandala & Byung Chung, 2009. "Evacuation Transportation Planning Under Uncertainty: A Robust Optimization Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 171-189, June.
    18. Cleber D. Rocco & Reinaldo Morabito, 2016. "Robust optimisation approach applied to the analysis of production / logistics and crop planning in the tomato processing industry," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(19), pages 5842-5861, October.
    19. Henao, César Augusto & Ferrer, Juan Carlos & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Vera, Jorge, 2016. "Multiskilling with closed chains in a service industry: A robust optimization approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 166-178.
    20. Marla, Lavanya & Rikun, Alexander & Stauffer, Gautier & Pratsini, Eleni, 2020. "Robust modeling and planning: Insights from three industrial applications," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:224:y:2013:i:3:p:449-457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.