IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v111y1998i1p152-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A branch-and-bound procedure for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem with generalized precedence relations

Author

Listed:
  • De Reyck, Bert
  • Herroelen, willy

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • De Reyck, Bert & Herroelen, willy, 1998. "A branch-and-bound procedure for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem with generalized precedence relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 152-174, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:111:y:1998:i:1:p:152-174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(97)00305-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salah E. Elmaghraby & Jerzy Kamburowski, 1992. "The Analysis of Activity Networks Under Generalized Precedence Relations (GPRs)," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(9), pages 1245-1263, September.
    2. A. H. Russell, 1970. "Cash Flows in Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(5), pages 357-373, January.
    3. Herroelen, Willy S. & Gallens, Els, 1993. "Computational experience with an optimal procedure for the scheduling of activities to maximize the net present value of projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 274-277, March.
    4. Erik Demeulemeester & Willy Herroelen, 1992. "A Branch-and-Bound Procedure for the Multiple Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(12), pages 1803-1818, December.
    5. Herroelen, Willy S. & Van Dommelen, Patrick & Demeulemeester, Erik L., 1997. "Project network models with discounted cash flows a guided tour through recent developments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 97-121, July.
    6. Erik L. Demeulemeester & Willy S. Herroelen, 1997. "New Benchmark Results for the Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(11), pages 1485-1492, November.
    7. Rainer Kolisch & Arno Sprecher & Andreas Drexl, 1995. "Characterization and Generation of a General Class of Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(10), pages 1693-1703, October.
    8. Zhan, Ji, 1994. "Heuristics for scheduling resource-constrained projects in MPM networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 192-205, July.
    9. Elmaghraby, Salah E. & Herroelen, Willy S., 1990. "The scheduling of activities to maximize the net present value of projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 35-49, November.
    10. Anthony A. Mastor, 1970. "An Experimental Investigation and Comparative Evaluation of Production Line Balancing Techniques," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(11), pages 728-746, July.
    11. Oya Icmeli & S. Selcuk Erenguc, 1996. "A Branch and Bound Procedure for the Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problem with Discounted Cash Flows," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(10), pages 1395-1408, October.
    12. James H. Patterson, 1984. "A Comparison of Exact Approaches for Solving the Multiple Constrained Resource, Project Scheduling Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(7), pages 854-867, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mario Vanhoucke & Erik Demeulemeester & Willy Herroelen, 2001. "On Maximizing the Net Present Value of a Project Under Renewable Resource Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(8), pages 1113-1121, August.
    2. Kolisch, R. & Padman, R., 2001. "An integrated survey of deterministic project scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 249-272, June.
    3. Brucker, Peter & Drexl, Andreas & Mohring, Rolf & Neumann, Klaus & Pesch, Erwin, 1999. "Resource-constrained project scheduling: Notation, classification, models, and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 3-41, January.
    4. Mika, Marek & Waligora, Grzegorz & Weglarz, Jan, 2005. "Simulated annealing and tabu search for multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling with positive discounted cash flows and different payment models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(3), pages 639-668, August.
    5. He, Zhengwen & Wang, Nengmin & Jia, Tao & Xu, Yu, 2009. "Simulated annealing and tabu search for multi-mode project payment scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 688-696, November.
    6. Herroelen, Willy S. & Van Dommelen, Patrick & Demeulemeester, Erik L., 1997. "Project network models with discounted cash flows a guided tour through recent developments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 97-121, July.
    7. Weglarz, Jan & Józefowska, Joanna & Mika, Marek & Waligóra, Grzegorz, 2011. "Project scheduling with finite or infinite number of activity processing modes - A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(3), pages 177-205, February.
    8. Boysen, Ole & Juretzka, Jan & Kimms, Alf, 1999. "Ameisen-Systeme zur kapitalwertmaximierenden Projektplanung," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 499, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    9. Wenhui Zhao & Nicholas G. Hall & Zhixin Liu, 2020. "Project Evaluation and Selection with Task Failures," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(2), pages 428-446, February.
    10. Joseph G. Szmerekovsky & George L. Vairaktarakis, 2006. "Maximizing project cash availability," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(4), pages 272-284, June.
    11. Vanhoucke, Mario & Demeulemeester, Erik & Herroelen, Willy, 2003. "Progress payments in project scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(3), pages 604-620, August.
    12. Sönke Hartmann, 1998. "A competitive genetic algorithm for resource‐constrained project scheduling," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(7), pages 733-750, October.
    13. Dayal Madhukar & Verma, Sanjay, 2015. "Multi-processor Exact Procedures for Regular Measures of the Multi-mode RCPSP," IIMA Working Papers WP2015-03-25, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    14. Pfeifer, Jeremy & Barker, Kash & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E. & Morshedlou, Nazanin, 2015. "Quantifying the risk of project delays with a genetic algorithm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PA), pages 34-44.
    15. M. Vanhoucke, 2006. "An efficient hybrid search algorithm for various optimization problems," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/365, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    16. Klein, Robert & Scholl, Armin, 1999. "Computing lower bounds by destructive improvement: An application to resource-constrained project scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 322-346, January.
    17. Etgar, Ran & Gelbard, Roy & Cohen, Yuval, 2017. "Optimizing version release dates of research and development long-term processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 642-653.
    18. Bert De Reyck & Erik Demeulemeester & Willy Herroelen, 1998. "Local search methods for the discrete time/resource trade‐off problem in project networks," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(6), pages 553-578, September.
    19. M. Vanhoucke, 2002. "Optimal Due Date Assignment In Project Scheduling," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 02/159, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    20. Wiesemann, Wolfram & Kuhn, Daniel & Rustem, Berç, 2010. "Maximizing the net present value of a project under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(2), pages 356-367, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:111:y:1998:i:1:p:152-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.