IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v16y1970i11p728-746.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Experimental Investigation and Comparative Evaluation of Production Line Balancing Techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony A. Mastor

    (On-Line Decisions, Inc., Los Angeles)

Abstract

Although computationally feasible optimizing algorithms for solving the production line balancing problem have not been found, a number of computational techniques have been devised and used to obtain solutions which are not necessarily optimal solutions but are hoped to be good solutions. In the study the most prominent of these techniques are examined and compared by applying them to a sample of production line balancing problems. The maximum output rate attained for a specified line length is used as the measure of effectiveness and the computing time required to make line balancing calculations for a specified output rate is used as the measure of cost. The central results of the study show that there are significant differences among the effectiveness results achieved by the line balancing techniques. Although the differences are not large, there are few changes in the relative effectiveness of the computing techniques over the range of line lengths, partial ordering strengths, and problem sizes that were investigated. For the larger problems the computing time differences are significant and in some instances are a more important consideration in the relative evaluation of the computing techniques than are the effectiveness results.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony A. Mastor, 1970. "An Experimental Investigation and Comparative Evaluation of Production Line Balancing Techniques," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(11), pages 728-746, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:16:y:1970:i:11:p:728-746
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.16.11.728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.16.11.728
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.16.11.728?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:16:y:1970:i:11:p:728-746. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.