IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v272y2014icp175-187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A trade-off approach of optimal land allocation between socio-economic development and ecological stability

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Jianjun
  • Fu, Meichen
  • Zhang, Zhongya
  • Tao, Jin
  • Fu, Wei

Abstract

Rapid urbanization and industrialization accelerate economic development, but have a negative influence on environments. The aim of this study is to attempt to handle the relationships properly between them, a hot topic all over the world. Based on the reviews of land allocation and the previous research on ecological storage, this paper takes both economic and ecological considerations into account in the framework design of land allocation model, and then proposes Primary Development and Secondary Optimization Model for Land Allocation (PDSO-LA model), together with a series of other models/approaches for judgment, analysis and test. The model follows the past, present and future land use and ecosystems and sets up relevant constraints, but more emphasizes the trade-offs within and between structural and functional ecological storage. Especially, this study gives a new trial idea and approach to estimate the converted equivalents for balanced individual functions-orientated sub-ecosystems in the modeled part for secondary optimization. In order to verify the availability and practicability of PDSO-LA model, this paper takes Wu’an as a case study and makes sufficient investigations. The results show that the volumes of structural ecological storage after allocation in 2010 and 2020 will reach 5865.24RMB/ha and 6096.21RMB/ha, in a rising trend, and its orderly change will be enhanced; in contrast, though land allocation cannot basically change the disorder trend for functional ecological storage, the intensity of disorder can be mitigated by using PDSO-LA model. Thus, it is concluded that PDSO-LA model can effectively improve or at least mitigate the disorder of trade-offs.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Jianjun & Fu, Meichen & Zhang, Zhongya & Tao, Jin & Fu, Wei, 2014. "A trade-off approach of optimal land allocation between socio-economic development and ecological stability," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 175-187.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:272:y:2014:i:c:p:175-187
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.10.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380013004754
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.10.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Jianjun & Fu, Meichen & Tao, Jin & Huang, Ying & Hassani, Ferri P. & Bai, Zhongke, 2010. "Response of ecological storage and conservation to land use transformation: A case study of a mining town in China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(10), pages 1427-1439.
    2. Domptail, Stéphanie & Nuppenau, Ernst-August, 2010. "The role of uncertainty and expectations in modeling (range)land use strategies: An application of dynamic optimization modeling with recursion," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 2475-2485, October.
    3. Vold, Arild, 2005. "Optimal land use and transport planning for the Greater Oslo area," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 548-565, July.
    4. Upadhyay, T.P. & Solberg, Birger & Sankhayan, Prem L., 2006. "Use of models to analyse land-use changes, forest/soil degradation and carbon sequestration with special reference to Himalayan region: A review and analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 349-371, December.
    5. Knoke, Thomas & Steinbeis, Otto-Emmanuel & Bösch, Matthias & Román-Cuesta, Rosa María & Burkhardt, Thomas, 2011. "Cost-effective compensation to avoid carbon emissions from forest loss: An approach to consider price-quantity effects and risk-aversion," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(6), pages 1139-1153, April.
    6. Dissanayake, Sahan T.M. & Nunez, Hector M., 2010. "Optimal Allocation of Land for Conservation: A General Equilibrium Analysis," 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado 61820, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Leroux, Anke D. & Creedy, John, 2007. "Optimal land conversion and growth with uncertain biodiversity costs," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 542-549, March.
    8. Wang, Szu-Hua & Huang, Shu-Li & Budd, William W., 2012. "Integrated ecosystem model for simulating land use allocation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 46-55.
    9. Sharawi, Huda Abdelwahab, 2006. "Optimal land-use allocation in central Sudan," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 10-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wencang Shen & Jianjun Zhang & Xiangli Zhou & Shengnan Li & Xiaoli Geng, 2021. "How to Perceive the Trade-Off of Economic and Ecological Intensity of Land Use in a City? A Functional Zones-Based Case Study of Tangshan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Zhang, Honghui & Zeng, Yongnian & Jin, Xiaobin & Shu, Bangrong & Zhou, Yinkang & Yang, Xuhong, 2016. "Simulating multi-objective land use optimization allocation using Multi-agent system—A case study in Changsha, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 334-347.
    3. Arjomandi, Amin & Mortazavi, Seyed Abolghasem & Khalilian, Sadegh & Garizi, Arash Zare, 2021. "Optimal land-use allocation using MCDM and SWAT for the Hablehroud Watershed, Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    4. Xiaojuan Luo & Shuyi Feng & Hongbin Liu & Bo Zhao, 2019. "Large-Scale Grain Producers’ Application of Land Conservation Technologies in China: Correlation Effects and Determinants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Changgang Ma & Min Zhou, 2018. "A GIS-Based Interval Fuzzy Linear Programming for Optimal Land Resource Allocation at a City Scale," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 143-166, January.
    6. Min Zhou & Shukui Tan & Lizao Tao & Xiangbo Zhu & Ghulam Akhmat, 2015. "An interval fuzzy land-use allocation model (IFLAM) for Beijing in association with environmental and ecological consideration under uncertainty," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 2269-2290, November.
    7. Zhang, Jing & Li, Sinan & Lin, Naifa & Lin, Yue & Yuan, Shaofeng & Zhang, Ling & Zhu, Jinxia & Wang, Ke & Gan, Muye & Zhu, Congmou, 2022. "Spatial identification and trade-off analysis of land use functions improve spatial zoning management in rapid urbanized areas, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    8. Boerema, A. & Van Passel, S. & Meire, P., 2018. "Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ecosystem Management With Ecosystem Services: From Theory to Practice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 207-218.
    9. Bingkui Qiu & Shasha Lu & Min Zhou & Lu Zhang & Yu Deng & Ci Song & Zuo Zhang, 2015. "A Hybrid Inexact Optimization Method for Land-Use Allocation in Association with Environmental/Ecological Requirements at a Watershed Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-25, April.
    10. Xiaotong Xie & Xiaoshun Li & Weikang He, 2020. "A Land Space Development Zoning Method Based on Resource–Environmental Carrying Capacity: A Case Study of Henan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Xiaoteng Cen & Cifang Wu & Xiaoshi Xing & Ming Fang & Zhuoma Garang & Yizhou Wu, 2015. "Coupling Intensive Land Use and Landscape Ecological Security for Urban Sustainability: An Integrated Socioeconomic Data and Spatial Metrics Analysis in Hangzhou City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-24, January.
    12. Qingsheng Li & Jinliang Huang & Cui Wang & Heshan Lin & Jiwei Zhang & Jinlong Jiang & Bingkun Wang, 2017. "Land Development Suitability Evaluation of Pingtan Island Based on Scenario Analysis and Landscape Ecological Quality Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-15, July.
    13. Dinghua Ou & Xingzhu Yao & Jianguo Xia & Xuesong Gao & Changquan Wang & Wanlu Chen & Qiquan Li & Zongda Hu & Juan Yang, 2019. "Development of a Composite Model for Simulating Landscape Pattern Optimization Allocation: A Case Study in the Longquanyi District of Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-35, May.
    14. Qixuan Li & Xingli Chen & Sheng Jiao & Wenmei Song & Wenke Zong & Yanhe Niu, 2022. "Can Mixed Land Use Reduce CO 2 Emissions? A Case Study of 268 Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    15. Shukui Tan & Lu Zhang & Min Zhou & Yanan Li & Siliang Wang & Bing Kuang & Xiang Luo, 2017. "A hybrid mathematical model for urban land-use planning in association with environmental–ecological consideration under uncertainty," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 44(1), pages 54-79, January.
    16. Hongbin Liu & Xiaojuan Luo, 2018. "Understanding Farmers’ Perceptions and Behaviors towards Farmland Quality Change in Northeast China: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Nana Yang & Jiansong Li & Binbin Lu & Minghai Luo & Linze Li, 2019. "Exploring the Spatial Pattern and Influencing Factors of Land Carrying Capacity in Wuhan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bingkui Qiu & Shasha Lu & Min Zhou & Lu Zhang & Yu Deng & Ci Song & Zuo Zhang, 2015. "A Hybrid Inexact Optimization Method for Land-Use Allocation in Association with Environmental/Ecological Requirements at a Watershed Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Xiao, Wu & Fu, Yanhua & Wang, Tao & Lv, Xuejiao, 2018. "Effects of land use transitions due to underground coal mining on ecosystem services in high groundwater table areas: A case study in the Yanzhou coalfield," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 213-221.
    3. Yao Lu & Min Zhou & Guoliang Ou & Zuo Zhang & Li He & Yuxiang Ma & Chaonan Ma & Jiating Tu & Siqi Li, 2021. "Sustainable Land-Use Allocation Model at a Watershed Level under Uncertainty," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Nana, Tian & Lu, Fadian, 2013. "Adaptive management decision of agroforestry under timber price risk," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 162-173.
    5. Babigumira, Ronnie & Angelsen, Arild & Buis, Maarten & Bauch, Simone & Sunderland, Terry & Wunder, Sven, 2014. "Forest Clearing in Rural Livelihoods: Household-Level Global-Comparative Evidence," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(S1), pages 67-79.
    6. Gintautas Mozgeris & Daiva Juknelienė, 2021. "Modeling Future Land Use Development: A Lithuanian Case," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    7. Nan Cui & Chen-Chieh Feng & Rui Han & Luo Guo, 2019. "Impact of Urbanization on Ecosystem Health: A Case Study in Zhuhai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Thomas Knoke, 2013. "Uncertainties and REDD+: Implications of applying the conservativeness principle to carbon stock estimates," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 119(2), pages 261-267, July.
    9. Mateo Cordier & Takuro Uehara & Jeffrey Weih & Bertrand Hamaide, 2017. "An Input-output Economic Model Integrated Within a System Dynamics Ecological Model: Feedback Loop Methodology Applied to Fish Nursery Restoration," Post-Print hal-04166569, HAL.
    10. Yong Liu & Yajuan Yu & Huaicheng Guo & Pingjian Yang, 2009. "Optimal Land-Use Management for Surface Source Water Protection Under Uncertainty: A Case Study of Songhuaba Watershed (Southwestern China)," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(10), pages 2069-2083, August.
    11. Holgui­n-Veras, Jose & Cetin, Mecit & Xia, Shuwen, 2006. "A comparative analysis of US toll policy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 852-871, December.
    12. Anderson, Blake & M'Gonigle, Michael, 2012. "Does ecological economics have a future?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 37-48.
    13. Guangfang Luo & Jianjun Zhang & Yongheng Rao & Xiaolei Zhu & Yiqiang Guo, 2017. "Coal Supply Chains: A Whole-Process-Based Measurement of Carbon Emissions in a Mining City of China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Wiggering, Hubert & Steinhardt, Uta, 2015. "A conceptual model for site-specific agricultural land-use," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 295(C), pages 42-46.
    15. Luz Maria Castro & Baltazar Calvas & Thomas Knoke, 2015. "Ecuadorian Banana Farms Should Consider Organic Banana with Low Price Risks in Their Land-Use Portfolios," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, March.
    16. Jiang Qian Ying, 2015. "Optimization for Multiclass Residential Location Models with Congestible Transportation Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 452-471, August.
    17. Vold, Arild, 2006. "Phased implementation of transport pricing for Greater Oslo," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 140-148, March.
    18. Min Zhou & Shukui Tan & Lizao Tao & Xiangbo Zhu & Ghulam Akhmat, 2015. "An interval fuzzy land-use allocation model (IFLAM) for Beijing in association with environmental and ecological consideration under uncertainty," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 2269-2290, November.
    19. You, L. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Zhang, J.L., 2014. "Modeling regional ecosystem development under uncertainty – A case study for New Binhai District of Tianjin," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 288(C), pages 127-142.
    20. Zhang, Jianjun & Fu, Meichen & Tao, Jin & Huang, Ying & Hassani, Ferri P. & Bai, Zhongke, 2010. "Response of ecological storage and conservation to land use transformation: A case study of a mining town in China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(10), pages 1427-1439.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:272:y:2014:i:c:p:175-187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.