IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v263y2013icp10-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constraints on interpretation of ecological niche models by limited environmental ranges on calibration areas

Author

Listed:
  • Owens, Hannah L.
  • Campbell, Lindsay P.
  • Dornak, L. Lynnette
  • Saupe, Erin E.
  • Barve, Narayani
  • Soberón, Jorge
  • Ingenloff, Kate
  • Lira-Noriega, Andrés
  • Hensz, Christopher M.
  • Myers, Corinne E.
  • Peterson, A. Townsend

Abstract

Correlational models of species’ ecological niches are commonly used to transfer model rules onto other sets of conditions to evaluate species’ distributional potential. As with any model fitting exercise, however, interpretation of model predictions outside the range of the independent variables on which models were calibrated is perilous, herein denoted as strict extrapolation to distinguish from extrapolation onto novel combinations of variables. We use novel visualization techniques to characterize model response surfaces for several niche modeling algorithms for a virtual species (wherein the truth is known) and for two transfer-based studies published by one of our group. All modeling algorithms for each species showed strict extrapolation, such that biologically unrealistic response surfaces were reconstructed. We discuss the implications of these results for calibration and interpretation of niche models and analysis of ecological niche evolution. We present Mobility-Oriented Parity (MOP), a modification and extension of the Multivariate Environmental Similarity Surface (MESS) metric currently in use, as a means of both quantifying environmental similarity between calibration and transfer regions and highlighting regions in geographic space where strict extrapolation occurs.

Suggested Citation

  • Owens, Hannah L. & Campbell, Lindsay P. & Dornak, L. Lynnette & Saupe, Erin E. & Barve, Narayani & Soberón, Jorge & Ingenloff, Kate & Lira-Noriega, Andrés & Hensz, Christopher M. & Myers, Corinne E. &, 2013. "Constraints on interpretation of ecological niche models by limited environmental ranges on calibration areas," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 263(C), pages 10-18.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:263:y:2013:i:c:p:10-18
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.04.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380013002159
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.04.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ,, 1999. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(5), pages 777-788, October.
    2. ,, 1999. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 151-160, February.
    3. Santika, Truly & Hutchinson, Michael F., 2009. "The effect of species response form on species distribution model prediction and inference," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(19), pages 2365-2379.
    4. Peterson, A. Townsend & Papeş, Monica & Soberón, Jorge, 2008. "Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 63-72.
    5. Barve, Narayani & Barve, Vijay & Jiménez-Valverde, Alberto & Lira-Noriega, Andrés & Maher, Sean P. & Peterson, A. Townsend & Soberón, Jorge & Villalobos, Fabricio, 2011. "The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(11), pages 1810-1819.
    6. ,, 1999. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 427-432, June.
    7. ,, 1999. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(4), pages 629-637, August.
    8. Saupe, E.E. & Barve, V. & Myers, C.E. & Soberón, J. & Barve, N. & Hensz, C.M. & Peterson, A.T. & Owens, H.L. & Lira-Noriega, A., 2012. "Variation in niche and distribution model performance: The need for a priori assessment of key causal factors," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 237, pages 11-22.
    9. Platts, Philip J. & McClean, Colin J. & Lovett, Jon C. & Marchant, Rob, 2008. "Predicting tree distributions in an East African biodiversity hotspot: model selection, data bias and envelope uncertainty," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 121-134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yilin Chen & Zhiyong Jiang & Ping Fan & Per G. P. Ericson & Gang Song & Xu Luo & Fumin Lei & Yanhua Qu, 2022. "The combination of genomic offset and niche modelling provides insights into climate change-driven vulnerability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Jiménez, L. & Soberón, J., 2022. "Estimating the fundamental niche: Accounting for the uneven availability of existing climates in the calibration area," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 464(C).
    3. Marianna V. P. Simões & Hanieh Saeedi & Marlon E. Cobos & Angelika Brandt, 2021. "Environmental matching reveals non-uniform range-shift patterns in benthic marine Crustacea," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 168(3), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Yañez-Arenas, Carlos & Guevara, Roger & Martínez-Meyer, Enrique & Mandujano, Salvador & Lobo, Jorge M., 2014. "Predicting species’ abundances from occurrence data: Effects of sample size and bias," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 294(C), pages 36-41.
    5. Ramos, Rodrigo Soares & Kumar, Lalit & Shabani, Farzin & Picanço, Marcelo Coutinho, 2019. "Risk of spread of tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) in tomato crops under various climate change scenarios," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 524-535.
    6. Fourcade, Yoan, 2021. "Fine-tuning niche models matters in invasion ecology. A lesson from the land planarian Obama nungara," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 457(C).
    7. David A. Prieto-Torres & Luis A. Sánchez-González & Marco F. Ortiz-Ramírez & Jorge E. Ramírez-Albores & Erick A. García-Trejo & Adolfo G. Navarro-Sigüenza, 2021. "Climate warming affects spatio-temporal biodiversity patterns of a highly vulnerable Neotropical avifauna," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Lewis A. Jones & Philip D. Mannion & Alexander Farnsworth & Fran Bragg & Daniel J. Lunt, 2022. "Climatic and tectonic drivers shaped the tropical distribution of coral reefs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Carlos Yañez-Arenas & A. Townsend Peterson & Karla Rodríguez-Medina & Narayani Barve, 2016. "Mapping current and future potential snakebite risk in the new world," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(4), pages 697-711, February.
    10. Diederik Strubbe & Laura Jiménez & A. Márcia Barbosa & Amy J. S. Davis & Luc Lens & Carsten Rahbek, 2023. "Mechanistic models project bird invasions with accuracy," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Zhu, Gengping & Fan, Jingyu & Peterson, A. Townsend, 2021. "Cautions in weighting individual ecological niche models in ensemble forecasting," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 448(C).
    12. Carlos Yañez-Arenas & A. Townsend Peterson & Karla Rodríguez-Medina & Narayani Barve, 2016. "Mapping current and future potential snakebite risk in the new world," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(4), pages 697-711, February.
    13. Jiménez, Laura & Soberón, Jorge & Christen, J. Andrés & Soto, Desireé, 2019. "On the problem of modeling a fundamental niche from occurrence data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 397(C), pages 74-83.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlos Yañez-Arenas & A Townsend Peterson & Pierre Mokondoko & Octavio Rojas-Soto & Enrique Martínez-Meyer, 2014. "The Use of Ecological Niche Modeling to Infer Potential Risk Areas of Snakebite in the Mexican State of Veracruz," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-9, June.
    2. Ochoa-Ochoa, Leticia M. & Flores-Villela, Oscar A. & Bezaury-Creel, Juan E., 2016. "Using one vs. many, sensitivity and uncertainty analyses of species distribution models with focus on conservation area networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 372-382.
    3. Saupe, E.E. & Barve, V. & Myers, C.E. & Soberón, J. & Barve, N. & Hensz, C.M. & Peterson, A.T. & Owens, H.L. & Lira-Noriega, A., 2012. "Variation in niche and distribution model performance: The need for a priori assessment of key causal factors," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 237, pages 11-22.
    4. Singh, Aditya & Kushwaha, S.P.S., 2011. "Refining logistic regression models for wildlife habitat suitability modeling—A case study with muntjak and goral in the Central Himalayas, India," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1354-1366.
    5. Barve, Narayani & Barve, Vijay & Jiménez-Valverde, Alberto & Lira-Noriega, Andrés & Maher, Sean P. & Peterson, A. Townsend & Soberón, Jorge & Villalobos, Fabricio, 2011. "The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(11), pages 1810-1819.
    6. Giannini, T.C. & Lira-Saade, R. & Ayala, R. & Saraiva, A.M. & Alves-dos-Santos, I., 2011. "Ecological niche similarities of Peponapis bees and non-domesticated Cucurbita species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(12), pages 2011-2018.
    7. Coro, Gianpaolo & Magliozzi, Chiara & Vanden Berghe, Edward & Bailly, Nicolas & Ellenbroek, Anton & Pagano, Pasquale, 2016. "Estimating absence locations of marine species from data of scientific surveys in OBIS," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 323(C), pages 61-76.
    8. Krzysztof S. Targiel & Maciej Nowak & Tadeusz Trzaskalik, 2018. "Scheduling non-critical activities using multicriteria approach," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(3), pages 585-598, September.
    9. F. Castro-Llanos & G. Hyman & J. Rubiano & J. Ramirez-Villegas & H. Achicanoy, 2019. "Climate change favors rice production at higher elevations in Colombia," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 1401-1430, December.
    10. Okitonyumbe Y.F., Joseph & Ulungu, Berthold E.-L., 2013. "Nouvelle caractérisation des solutions efficaces des problèmes d’optimisation combinatoire multi-objectif [New characterization of efficient solution in multi-objective combinatorial optimization]," MPRA Paper 66123, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Amit Kumar & Anila Gupta, 2013. "Mehar’s methods for fuzzy assignment problems with restrictions," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 27-44, March.
    12. Monica Motta & Caterina Sartori, 2020. "Normality and Nondegeneracy of the Maximum Principle in Optimal Impulsive Control Under State Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 185(1), pages 44-71, April.
    13. Zhang, Quanzhong & Wei, Haiyan & Liu, Jing & Zhao, Zefang & Ran, Qiao & Gu, Wei, 2021. "A Bayesian network with fuzzy mathematics for species habitat suitability analysis: A case with limited Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 450(C).
    14. Chenchen Wu & Dachuan Xu & Donglei Du & Wenqing Xu, 2016. "An approximation algorithm for the balanced Max-3-Uncut problem using complex semidefinite programming rounding," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1017-1035, November.
    15. Gengping Zhu & Matthew J Petersen & Wenjun Bu, 2012. "Selecting Biological Meaningful Environmental Dimensions of Low Discrepancy among Ranges to Predict Potential Distribution of Bean Plataspid Invasion," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-9, September.
    16. Uzma Ashraf & Hassan Ali & Muhammad Nawaz Chaudry & Irfan Ashraf & Adila Batool & Zafeer Saqib, 2016. "Predicting the Potential Distribution of Olea ferruginea in Pakistan incorporating Climate Change by Using Maxent Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-11, July.
    17. Ernst Althaus & Felix Rauterberg & Sarah Ziegler, 2020. "Computing Euclidean Steiner trees over segments," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(3), pages 309-325, October.
    18. World Bank, 2003. "Argentina : Reforming Policies and Institutions for Efficiency and Equity of Public Expenditures," World Bank Publications - Reports 14637, The World Bank Group.
    19. Ceretani, Andrea N. & Salva, Natalia N. & Tarzia, Domingo A., 2018. "Approximation of the modified error function," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 607-617.
    20. Parihar, Amit Kumar Singh & Hammer, Thomas & Sridhar, G., 2015. "Development and testing of tube type wet ESP for the removal of particulate matter and tar from producer gas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 875-883.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:263:y:2013:i:c:p:10-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.