IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v219y2008i1p66-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of stepwise selection and Bayesian model averaging for yield gap analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Prost, Lorène
  • Makowski, David
  • Jeuffroy, Marie-Hélène

Abstract

Stepwise selection is frequently used in ecology and agronomy. In the yield gap analysis approach, linear regression and stepwise selection are used to identify and rank the limiting factors of crop yield. The main value of stepwise selection is that it can be used to select a subset of explanatory variables by using statistical criteria. The number of parameters in the final model obtained by using such a procedure is expected to be less than in the complete model, and the variance of the estimated parameters can be reduced. Nonetheless, several recent studies have emphasized the limitations of stepwise selection, such as the lack of stability of the set of selected variables and bias in the parameter estimates. Model mixing methods like Bayesian model averaging (BMA) have been proposed as an alternative, but these methods have never been used for yield gap analysis. The objective of this paper was to compare stepwise selection methods and BMA for yield gap analysis. Our comparison was based on 10000 bootstrap samples drawn from a dataset of 160 plots including 8 years of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) experiments. Parameter estimates obtained after stepwise selection were compared to the estimated values obtained without any selection and to the estimated values obtained with BMA. The results showed that these statistical methods led to contrasted frequencies of variables selections and to different estimated parameter values. The frequencies of selection were greater with BMA than with stepwise selection. BMA also gave smaller standard deviations for parameter estimates in many cases, but this was not always the case. Compared to the stepwise selection methods, the parameter estimates obtained with BMA were closer to zero. Our results showed that the bootstrap approach can efficiently allow agronomists to compare various statistical methods for selecting explanatory variables and for estimating the effects of limiting factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Prost, Lorène & Makowski, David & Jeuffroy, Marie-Hélène, 2008. "Comparison of stepwise selection and Bayesian model averaging for yield gap analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 66-76.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:219:y:2008:i:1:p:66-76
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.07.026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380008003815
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.07.026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuan, Zheng & Yang, Yuhong, 2005. "Combining Linear Regression Models: When and How?," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 100, pages 1202-1214, December.
    2. Chris Chatfield, 1995. "Model Uncertainty, Data Mining and Statistical Inference," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 158(3), pages 419-444, May.
    3. Dore, T. & Sebillotte, M. & Meynard, J. M., 1997. "A diagnostic method for assessing regional variations in crop yield," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 169-188, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luong Hai Nguyen & Tsunemi Watanabe, 2017. "The Impact of Project Organizational Culture on the Performance of Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Han Wang & Sieglinde S Snapp & Monica Fisher & Frederi Viens, 2019. "A Bayesian analysis of longitudinal farm surveys in Central Malawi reveals yield determinants and site-specific management strategies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng, Jingfu & Yang, Yuhong, 2022. "On improvability of model selection by model averaging," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 246-262.
    2. Buchholz, Anika & Hollander, Norbert & Sauerbrei, Willi, 2008. "On properties of predictors derived with a two-step bootstrap model averaging approach--A simulation study in the linear regression model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 2778-2793, January.
    3. Song Liu & Yuhong Yang, 2012. "Combining models in longitudinal data analysis," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 64(2), pages 233-254, April.
    4. Kolassa, Stephan, 2011. "Combining exponential smoothing forecasts using Akaike weights," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 238-251, April.
    5. Faguang Wen & Jiming Jiang & Yihui Luan, 2024. "Model Selection Path and Construction of Model Confidence Set under High-Dimensional Variables," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Kolassa, Stephan, 2011. "Combining exponential smoothing forecasts using Akaike weights," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 238-251.
    7. Claudia García-García & Catalina B. García-García & Román Salmerón, 2021. "Confronting collinearity in environmental regression models: evidence from world data," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(3), pages 895-926, September.
    8. Chou, Ping & Chuang, Howard Hao-Chun & Chou, Yen-Chun & Liang, Ting-Peng, 2022. "Predictive analytics for customer repurchase: Interdisciplinary integration of buy till you die modeling and machine learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 635-651.
    9. Sai Ding & John Knight, 2011. "Why has China Grown So Fast? The Role of Physical and Human Capital Formation," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 73(2), pages 141-174, April.
    10. Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti & Luca Pedini, 2020. "ParMA: Parallelised Bayesian Model Averaging for Generalised Linear Models," Working Papers 2020:28, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    11. Wan, Alan T.K. & Zhang, Xinyu & Zou, Guohua, 2010. "Least squares model averaging by Mallows criterion," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 277-283, June.
    12. Robert Lehmann & Antje Weyh, 2016. "Forecasting Employment in Europe: Are Survey Results Helpful?," Journal of Business Cycle Research, Springer;Centre for International Research on Economic Tendency Surveys (CIRET), vol. 12(1), pages 81-117, September.
    13. Castle Jennifer L. & Doornik Jurgen A & Hendry David F., 2011. "Evaluating Automatic Model Selection," Journal of Time Series Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-33, February.
    14. Lee, Yun Shin & Scholtes, Stefan, 2014. "Empirical prediction intervals revisited," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 217-234.
    15. Johan Verbeeck & Martin Geroldinger & Konstantin Thiel & Andrew Craig Hooker & Sebastian Ueckert & Mats Karlsson & Arne Cornelius Bathke & Johann Wolfgang Bauer & Geert Molenberghs & Georg Zimmermann, 2023. "How to analyze continuous and discrete repeated measures in small‐sample cross‐over trials?," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3998-4011, December.
    16. Coleman, Stephen, 2005. "Testing Theories with Qualitative and Quantitative Predictions," MPRA Paper 105171, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Ewout W. Steyerberg, 2005. "Local Applicability of Clinical and Model-Based Probability Estimates," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 25(6), pages 678-680, November.
    18. Mark F. J. Steel, 2020. "Model Averaging and Its Use in Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 58(3), pages 644-719, September.
    19. Jing Zhou & Gerda Claeskens & Jelena Bradic, 2020. "Detangling robustness in high dimensions: composite versus model-averaged estimation," Papers 2006.07457, arXiv.org.
    20. Brooks, Jeremy S., 2010. "The Buddha mushroom: Conservation behavior and the development of institutions in Bhutan," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 779-795, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:219:y:2008:i:1:p:66-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.