IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v69y2016icp223-232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-investigation service need and utilization among families at risk of maltreatment

Author

Listed:
  • Simon, James David
  • Brooks, Devon

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between different areas of family need and the utilization of home-based, post-investigation services (HBPS) following a child protective services (CPS) investigation. The sample consisted of 2598 families with children who remained at home after an initial CPS investigation between July 2006 and April 2011. Family need was measured in three areas (concrete, clinical, and educational) using the Family Assessment Form (FAF), and families received one or more of the following HBPS: case management, concrete, educational, and clinical services. Pearson chi-square analyses were utilized to identify significant areas of needs to be included in a final multivariate logistic regression for each HBPS while controlling for demographic characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon, James David & Brooks, Devon, 2016. "Post-investigation service need and utilization among families at risk of maltreatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 223-232.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:69:y:2016:i:c:p:223-232
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.08.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740916302638
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.08.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. 淑英 徐 & Joseph Galaskiewicz, 2011. "Editors' Forum: Research and Publishing Ethics," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 7(3), pages 1-8, November.
    2. 觉 梁, 2011. "Editors' Forum: Research and Publishing Ethics," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 7(3), pages 85-94, November.
    3. Ryan, Joseph P. & Schuerman, John R., 2004. "Matching family problems with specific family preservation services: a study of service effectiveness," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 347-372, April.
    4. Faver, Catherine A. & Crawford, Sharon L. & Combs-Orme, Terri, 1999. "Services for child maltreatment: Challenges for research and practice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 89-109, February.
    5. Franke, Todd M. & Christie, Christina A. & Ho, Jennifer & Du, Lingyun, 2013. "An item response theory investigation of the Family Assessment Form," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 1780-1788.
    6. Marsh, Jeanne C. & Cao, Dingcai & Guerrero, Erick & Shin, Hee-Choon, 2009. "Need-service matching in substance abuse treatment: Racial/ethnic differences," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 43-51, February.
    7. 晓萍 陈, 2011. "Editors' Forum: Research and Publishing Ethics," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 7(3), pages 35-44, November.
    8. Choi, Sam & Ryan, Joseph P., 2007. "Co-occurring problems for substance abusing mothers in child welfare: Matching services to improve family reunification," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(11), pages 1395-1410, November.
    9. Conley, Amy, 2007. "Differential response: A critical examination of a secondary prevention model," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(11), pages 1454-1468, November.
    10. Bagdasaryan, Sofya, 2005. "Evaluating family preservation services: Reframing the question of effectiveness," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 615-635, June.
    11. Fernandez, Elizabeth, 2007. "Supporting children and responding to their families: Capturing the evidence on family support," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(10), pages 1368-1394, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheng, Tyrone C. & Lo, Celia C., 2020. "Mental health services receipt among caregivers in the child welfare system: A longitudinal analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    2. Slack, Kristen S. & Berger, Lawrence M. & Reilly, Aaron & Reynders, Rachel & Cai, Julie Y., 2022. "Preventing child protective services system involvement by asking families what they need: Findings from a multi-site RCT of the community response program (CRP)," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    3. Simon, James David & Brooks, Devon, 2019. "Targeting services to reduce need after a child abuse investigation: Examining complex needs, matched services, and meaningful change," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 386-394.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simon, James David & Brooks, Devon, 2019. "Targeting services to reduce need after a child abuse investigation: Examining complex needs, matched services, and meaningful change," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 386-394.
    2. Atalay, Yasemin & Biermann, Frank & Kalfagianni, Agni, 2016. "Adoption of renewable energy technologies in oil-rich countries: Explaining policy variation in the Gulf Cooperation Council states," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 206-214.
    3. Krogscheepers, Corris & Gossel, Sean Joss, 2015. "Input cost and international demand effects on the production of platinum group metals in South Africa," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 193-201.
    4. Karim, Md. Ershadul & Munir, Abu Bakar & Reza, Ahmed Wasif & Muhammad-Sukki, Firdaus & Mohd Yasin, Siti Hajar & Abu-Bakar, Siti Hawa & Abdul Rahim, Ruzairi, 2015. "Too enthusiastic to care for safety: Present status and recent developments of nanosafety in ASEAN countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 168-181.
    5. D'Andrade, Amy C. & Chambers, Ruth M., 2012. "Parental problems, case plan requirements, and service targeting in child welfare reunification," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 2131-2138.
    6. Desautels, Julien & Touchette, Luc & Pauzé, Robert, 2020. "Intensive family intervention programs: Tailoring interventions to family clinical profiles," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    7. Kutoma J. Wakunuma & Bernd Carsten Stahl, 2014. "Tomorrow’s ethics and today’s response: An investigation into the ways information systems professionals perceive and address emerging ethical issues," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 383-397, July.
    8. Kang, Jiyoung, 2012. "Pathways from social support to service use among caregivers at risk of child maltreatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 933-939.
    9. Chambers, Ruth M. & Brocato, Jo & Fatemi, Maryam & Rodriguez, Angel Y., 2016. "An innovative child welfare pilot initiative: Results and outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 143-151.
    10. Harrison, Tom, 2017. "NGOs and Personal Politics: The Relationship between NGOs and political leaders in West Bengal, India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 485-496.
    11. LaBrenz, Catherine A. & Lloyd Sieger, Margaret & Choi, Mijin & Harrell, Danielle R. & Findley, Erin & Robinson, Erica D. & Baiden, Philip, 2023. "Family support services and reunification across diverse racial/ethnic groups: A survival analysis utilizing administrative child welfare data," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    12. Lin, Yu-An & Hedeker, Donald & Ryan, Joseph P. & Marsh, Jeanne C., 2020. "Longitudinal analysis of need-service matching for substance-involved parents in the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    13. Simon, James David & D'Andrade, Amy & Hsu, Hsun-Ta, 2021. "The intersection of child welfare services and public assistance: An analysis of dual-system involvement and successful family preservation completion on a maltreatment re-report," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    14. Fernandez, Elizabeth, 2007. "Supporting children and responding to their families: Capturing the evidence on family support," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(10), pages 1368-1394, October.
    15. Ben-David, Vered, 2016. "Substance-abusing parents and their children in termination of parental rights cases in Israel," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 94-100.
    16. Finno-Velasquez, Megan & Seay, Kristen D. & He, Amy S., 2016. "A national probability study of problematic substance use and treatment receipt among Latino caregivers involved with child welfare: The influence of nativity and legal status," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 61-67.
    17. Piper, Kathryn A., 2017. "Differential response in child protection: How much is too much?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 69-80.
    18. Keegan Eamon, Mary & Kopels, Sandra, 2004. "`For reasons of poverty': court challenges to child welfare practices and mandated programs," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(9), pages 821-836, September.
    19. Shdaimah, Corey S., 2009. ""CPS is not a housing agency"; Housing is a CPS problem: Towards a definition and typology of housing problems in child welfare cases," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 211-218, February.
    20. Lietz, Cynthia A., 2009. "Examining families' perceptions of intensive in-home services: A mixed methods study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 1337-1345, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:69:y:2016:i:c:p:223-232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.