IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v120y2021ics0190740920321290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategies for constructing household and family units with linked administrative records

Author

Listed:
  • Cuccaro-Alamin, Stephanie
  • Eastman, Andrea Lane
  • Foust, Regan
  • McCroskey, Jacquelyn
  • Nghiem, Huy Tran
  • Putnam-Hornstein, Emily

Abstract

Children’s circumstances are inextricably tied to those of their parents. Two-generation intervention strategies recognize that improving the capacity and circumstances of parents will yield benefits in this generation and the next. Administrative data from health and human services agencies present a unique source of information concerning these interventions designed to buffer child and parent risk. Those records, however, often exist in silos, collected by discrete programs for administration and primarily focused on the client served. Breaking down those silos by linking parents and children, as well as other family or household members, makes it possible to effectively develop, coordinate, and evaluate two-generation intervention strategies. The objective of this review is to outline conceptual strategies for constructing household and family units with linked administrative records for research purposes. Specifically, this paper: (1) provides an understanding of how households and family units have historically been conceptualized in the United States and illustrate the limitations of this approach for studying complex families; (2) examines the limitations of this approach for studying contemporary families; and (3) explores strategies for organizing administrative data into household and family units for this purpose.

Suggested Citation

  • Cuccaro-Alamin, Stephanie & Eastman, Andrea Lane & Foust, Regan & McCroskey, Jacquelyn & Nghiem, Huy Tran & Putnam-Hornstein, Emily, 2021. "Strategies for constructing household and family units with linked administrative records," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:120:y:2021:i:c:s0190740920321290
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740920321290
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105706?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheela Kennedy & Steven Ruggles, 2014. "Breaking Up Is Hard to Count: The Rise of Divorce in the United States, 1980–2010," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 51(2), pages 587-598, April.
    2. Bruce D. Meyer & Wallace K. C. Mok & James X. Sullivan, 2015. "Household Surveys in Crisis," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(4), pages 199-226, Fall.
    3. Catherine G. Massey, 2014. "Creating Linked Historical Data: An Assessment of the Census Bureau’s Ability to Assign Protected Identification Keys to the 1960 Census," CARRA Working Papers 2014-12, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    4. Deborah Goldschmidt & Wolfram Klosterhuber & Johannes F Schmieder, 2017. "Identifying couples in administrative data [Identifizierung von Ehepaaren in Administrativen Daten]," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 50(1), pages 29-43, August.
    5. Carlos Oya, 2015. "Who counts? Challenges and biases in defining 'households' in research on poverty," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 336-345, September.
    6. Mostafa, Tarek & Gambaro, Ludovica & Joshi, Heather, 2018. "The Impact of Complex Family Structure on Child Well‐Being: Evidence From Siblings," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 80(4), pages 902-918.
    7. Roos, Leslie L. & Brownell, Marni & Lix, Lisa & Roos, Noralou P. & Walld, Randy & MacWilliam, Leonard, 2008. "From health research to social research: Privacy, methods, approaches," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 117-129, January.
    8. Paula Fomby & Joshua A. Goode & Stefanie Mollborn, 2016. "Family Complexity, Siblings, and Children’s Aggressive Behavior at School Entry," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 53(1), pages 1-26, February.
    9. Sheela Kennedy & Catherine Fitch, 2012. "Measuring Cohabitation and Family Structure in the United States: Assessing the Impact of New Data From the Current Population Survey," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 49(4), pages 1479-1498, November.
    10. Donna Ginther & Robert Pollak, 2004. "Family structure and children’s educational outcomes: Blended families, stylized facts, and descriptive regressions," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 41(4), pages 671-696, November.
    11. David Card & Andrew K.G. Hildreth & Lara D. Shore-Sheppard, 2004. "The Measurement of Medicaid Coverage in the SIPP: Evidence From a Comparison of Matched Records," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 22, pages 410-420, October.
    12. Solveig Christiansen & Nico Keilman, 2013. "Probabilistic household forecasts based on register data- the case of Denmark and Finland," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 28(43), pages 1263-1302.
    13. Maria J. Wisselgren & S�ren Edvinsson & Mats Berggren & Maria Larsson, 2014. "Testing Methods of Record Linkage on Swedish Censuses," Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 138-151, September.
    14. Wei-Jun J. Yeung & Greg J. Duncan & Martha S. Hill, 2001. "Childhood family structure and young adult behaviors," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 271-299.
    15. Goldschmidt, Deborah & Klosterhuber, Wolfram & Schmieder, Johannes F., 2017. "Identifying couples in administrative data," Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 50(1), pages 29-43.
    16. Marla Cancian & Deborah Reed, "undated". "Family Structure, Childbearing, and Parental Employment: Implications for the Level and Trend in Poverty," Mathematica Policy Research Reports c54934d6dfb5438485437cf48, Mathematica Policy Research.
    17. Lisa Gennetian, 2005. "One or two parents? Half or step siblings? The effect of family structure on young children's achievement," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 18(3), pages 415-436, September.
    18. Enamorado, Ted & Fifield, Benjamin & Imai, Kosuke, 2019. "Using a Probabilistic Model to Assist Merging of Large-Scale Administrative Records," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 113(2), pages 353-371, May.
    19. Steffen Künn, 2015. "The challenges of linking survey and administrative data," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 214-214, December.
    20. Shelly Lundberg & Robert A. Pollak, 2007. "The American Family and Family Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 21(2), pages 3-26, Spring.
    21. Akresh, Richard & Edmonds, Eric V., 2010. "The Analytical Returns to Measuring a Detailed Household Roster," IZA Discussion Papers 4759, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    22. Sandra Hofferth, 2006. "Residential father family type and child well-being: Investment versus selection," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 43(1), pages 53-77, February.
    23. Deborah Goldschmidt & Wolfram Klosterhuber & Johannes F Schmieder, 2017. "Identifying couples in administrative data [Identifizierung von Ehepaaren in Administrativen Daten]," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 50(1), pages 29-43, August.
    24. repec:mpr:mprres:6419 is not listed on IDEAS
    25. Sangeetha Madhavan & Shelley Clark & Donatien Beguy & Caroline W. Kabiru & Mark Gross, 2017. "Moving beyond the household: Innovations in data collection on kinship," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(1), pages 117-132, January.
    26. Robert Goerge & Bong Joo Lee, 2002. "Matching and cleaning administrative data," New Zealand Economic Papers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 63-64.
    27. Bessière, Céline & Gollac, Sibylle, 2018. "Is social network analysis useful for studying the family economy?," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 19(3), pages 4-10.
    28. R. Kelly Raley & Larry L. Bumpass, 2003. "The topography of the divorce plateau," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 8(8), pages 245-260.
    29. Adela Luque & Deborah Wagner, 2015. "Assessing Coverage and Quality of the 2007 Prototype Census Kidlink Database," CARRA Working Papers 2015-07, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    30. Susan Brown & Wendy Manning, 2009. "Family boundary ambiguity and the measurement of family structure: the significance of cohabitation," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 46(1), pages 85-101, February.
    31. Elise Whitley & Ian J Deary & Geoff Der & G David Batty & Michaela Benzeval, 2012. "Paternal Age in Relation to Offspring Intelligence in the West of Scotland Twenty-07 Prospective Cohort Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-8, December.
    32. Anders Björklund & Donna Ginther & Marianne Sundström, 2007. "Family structure and child outcomes in the USA and Sweden," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 20(1), pages 183-201, February.
    33. Lery, Bridgette & Shaw, Terry V. & Magruder, Joseph, 2005. "Using administrative child welfare data to identify sibling groups," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(7), pages 783-791, July.
    34. Stacey H. Chen & Yen-Chien Chen & Jin-Tan Liu, 2009. "The Impact of Unexpected Maternal Death on Education: First Evidence from Three National Administrative Data Links," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(2), pages 149-153, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wendy D. Manning & Susan L. Brown & J. Bart Stykes, 2014. "Family Complexity among Children in the United States," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 654(1), pages 48-65, July.
    2. Shelly Lundberg & Robert A. Pollak & Jenna Stearns, 2016. "Family Inequality: Diverging Patterns in Marriage, Cohabitation, and Childbearing," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(2), pages 79-102, Spring.
    3. Amy O’Hara & Rachel M. Shattuck & Robert M. Goerge, 2017. "Linking Federal Surveys with Administrative Data to Improve Research on Families," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 669(1), pages 63-74, January.
    4. Prevoo, Tyas & ter Weel, Bas, 2014. "The Effect of Family Disruption on Children's Personality Development: Evidence from British Longitudinal Data," IZA Discussion Papers 8712, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Mariana Amorim & Laura M. Tach, 2019. "Multiple-Partner Fertility and Cohort Change in the Prevalence of Half-Siblings," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(6), pages 2033-2061, December.
    6. Bas ter Weel & Tyas Prevoo, 2014. "The effect of family disruption on children's personality development: Evidence from British longitudinal data," CPB Discussion Paper 295, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    7. Bas ter Weel & Tyas Prevoo, 2014. "The effect of family disruption on children's personality development: Evidence from British longitudinal data," CPB Discussion Paper 295.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    8. Marco Francesconi & Stephen Jenkins & Thomas Siedler, 2010. "Childhood family structure and schooling outcomes: evidence for Germany," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 23(3), pages 1073-1103, June.
    9. Hannah Illing & Johannes Schmieder & Simon Trenkle, "undated". "The Gender Gap in Earnings Losses After Job Displacement," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2022_381, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    10. Marie-Christine Saint-Jacques & Élisabeth Godbout & Sylvie Drapeau & Toula Kourgiantakis & Claudine Parent, 2018. "Researching Children’s Adjustment in Stepfamilies: How is it Studied? What Do we Learn?," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(6), pages 1831-1865, December.
    11. Kelly Bedard & Allison Witman, 2020. "Family structure and the gender gap in ADHD," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1101-1129, December.
    12. repec:iab:iabfme:202103(en is not listed on IDEAS
    13. David Blau & Wilbert Klaauw, 2008. "A demographic analysis of the family structure experiences of children in the United States," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 193-221, September.
    14. Ostermann, Kerstin & Eppelsheimer, Johann & Gläser, Nina & Haller, Peter & Oertel, Martina, 2022. "Geodata in labor market research: trends, potentials and perspectives," Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 56, pages 1-5.
    15. Alexander N. Slade & Andrea H. Beller & Elizabeth T. Powers, 2017. "Family structure and young adult health outcomes," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 175-197, March.
    16. Donna K. Ginther & Astrid L. Grasdal & Robert A. Pollak, 2019. "Fathers' Multiple-Partner Fertility and Children's Educational Outcomes," Working Papers 2019-062, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    17. Naoko Akashi-Ronquest, 2009. "The impact of biological preferences on parental investments in children and step-children," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 59-81, March.
    18. Nassal, Lea & Paul, Marie, 2021. "Couples, Careers, and Spatial Mobility," VfS Annual Conference 2021 (Virtual Conference): Climate Economics 242370, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    19. Gudgeon, Matthew & Trenkle, Simon, 2020. "The Speed of Earnings Responses to Taxation and the Role of Firm Labor Demand," IZA Discussion Papers 13931, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Zinn, Andrew, 2010. "A typology of kinship foster families: Latent class and exploratory analyses of kinship family structure and household composition," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 325-337, March.
    21. Alejandro Cid & Charles Stokes, 2013. "Family Structure and Children’s Education Outcome: Evidence from Uruguay," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 185-199, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:120:y:2021:i:c:s0190740920321290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.