IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v128y2018icp271-291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Likelihood-free inference in high dimensions with synthetic likelihood

Author

Listed:
  • Ong, Victor M.-H.
  • Nott, David J.
  • Tran, Minh-Ngoc
  • Sisson, Scott A.
  • Drovandi, Christopher C.

Abstract

One popular approach to likelihood-free inference is the synthetic likelihood method, which assumes that some data summary statistics which are informative about model parameters are approximately Gaussian for each value of the parameter. Based on this assumption, a Gaussian likelihood can be constructed, where the mean and covariance matrix of the summary statistics are estimated via Monte Carlo. The objective of the current work is to improve on a variational implementation of the Bayesian synthetic likelihood introduced recently in the literature, to enable the application of that approach to high-dimensional problems. Here high-dimensional can mean problems with more than one hundred parameters. The improvements introduced relate to shrinkage estimation of covariance matrices in estimation of the synthetic likelihood, improved implementation of control variate approaches to stochastic gradient variance reduction, and parsimonious but expressive parametrizations of variational normal posterior covariance matrices in terms of factor structures to reduce the dimension of the optimization problem. The shrinkage covariance estimation is particularly important for stability of stochastic gradient optimization with noisy likelihood estimates. However, as the dimension increases, the quality of the posterior approximation deteriorates unless the number of Monte Carlo samples used to estimate the synthetic likelihood also increases. We explore the properties of the method in some real examples in cases where either the number of summary statistics, the number of model parameters, or both, are large.

Suggested Citation

  • Ong, Victor M.-H. & Nott, David J. & Tran, Minh-Ngoc & Sisson, Scott A. & Drovandi, Christopher C., 2018. "Likelihood-free inference in high dimensions with synthetic likelihood," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 271-291.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:128:y:2018:i:c:p:271-291
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2018.07.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947318301749
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2018.07.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geweke, John & Zhou, Guofu, 1996. "Measuring the Pricing Error of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 9(2), pages 557-587.
    2. Warton, David I., 2008. "Penalized Normal Likelihood and Ridge Regularization of Correlation and Covariance Matrices," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 340-349, March.
    3. Heinz Neudecker & Shuangzhe Liu, 2001. "Some statistical properties of Hadamard products of random matrices," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 475-487, October.
    4. Heinz Neudecker & Shuangzhe Liu, 2001. "Statistical properties of the Hadamard product of random vectors," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 529-533, October.
    5. Simon N. Wood, 2010. "Statistical inference for noisy nonlinear ecological dynamic systems," Nature, Nature, vol. 466(7310), pages 1102-1104, August.
    6. Li, J. & Nott, D.J. & Fan, Y. & Sisson, S.A., 2017. "Extending approximate Bayesian computation methods to high dimensions via a Gaussian copula model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 77-89.
    7. Rayner, G. D. & MacGillivray, H. L., 2002. "Weighted quantile-based estimation for a class of transformation distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 401-433, June.
    8. Drovandi, Christopher C. & Pettitt, Anthony N., 2011. "Likelihood-free Bayesian estimation of multivariate quantile distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(9), pages 2541-2556, September.
    9. Ormerod, J. T. & Wand, M. P., 2010. "Explaining Variational Approximations," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 64(2), pages 140-153.
    10. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5724 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. A. Doucet & M. K. Pitt & G. Deligiannidis & R. Kohn, 2015. "Efficient implementation of Markov chain Monte Carlo when using an unbiased likelihood estimator," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 102(2), pages 295-313.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Henri Pesonen & Umberto Simola & Alvaro Köhn‐Luque & Henri Vuollekoski & Xiaoran Lai & Arnoldo Frigessi & Samuel Kaski & David T. Frazier & Worapree Maneesoonthorn & Gael M. Martin & Jukka Corander, 2023. "ABC of the future," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 91(2), pages 243-268, August.
    2. Priddle, Jacob W. & Drovandi, Christopher, 2023. "Transformations in semi-parametric Bayesian synthetic likelihood," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gael M. Martin & David T. Frazier & Christian P. Robert, 2020. "Computing Bayes: Bayesian Computation from 1763 to the 21st Century," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 14/20, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    2. Gael M. Martin & David T. Frazier & Christian P. Robert, 2021. "Approximating Bayes in the 21st Century," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 24/21, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    3. Li, J. & Nott, D.J. & Fan, Y. & Sisson, S.A., 2017. "Extending approximate Bayesian computation methods to high dimensions via a Gaussian copula model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 77-89.
    4. Matias Quiroz & Robert Kohn & Mattias Villani & Minh-Ngoc Tran, 2019. "Speeding Up MCMC by Efficient Data Subsampling," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(526), pages 831-843, April.
    5. Gael M. Martin & David T. Frazier & Ruben Loaiza-Maya & Florian Huber & Gary Koop & John Maheu & Didier Nibbering & Anastasios Panagiotelis, 2023. "Bayesian Forecasting in the 21st Century: A Modern Review," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 1/23, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    6. Liu, Shuangzhe & Leiva, Víctor & Zhuang, Dan & Ma, Tiefeng & Figueroa-Zúñiga, Jorge I., 2022. "Matrix differential calculus with applications in the multivariate linear model and its diagnostics," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Wiqvist, Samuel & Golightly, Andrew & McLean, Ashleigh T. & Picchini, Umberto, 2021. "Efficient inference for stochastic differential equation mixed-effects models using correlated particle pseudo-marginal algorithms," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Gael M. Martin & David T. Frazier & Worapree Maneesoonthorn & Ruben Loaiza-Maya & Florian Huber & Gary Koop & John Maheu & Didier Nibbering & Anastasios Panagiotelis, 2022. "Bayesian Forecasting in Economics and Finance: A Modern Review," Papers 2212.03471, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    9. Gael M. Martin & David T. Frazier & Christian P. Robert, 2022. "Computing Bayes: From Then `Til Now," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 14/22, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    10. Farmer, J. Doyne & Dyer, Joel & Cannon, Patrick & Schmon, Sebastian, 2022. "Black-box Bayesian inference for economic agent-based models," INET Oxford Working Papers 2022-05, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    11. Priddle, Jacob W. & Drovandi, Christopher, 2023. "Transformations in semi-parametric Bayesian synthetic likelihood," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    12. Mumtaz, Haroon & Theodoridis, Konstantinos, 2017. "Common and country specific economic uncertainty," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 205-216.
    13. Avagyan, Vahe & Alonso Fernández, Andrés Modesto & Nogales, Francisco J., 2015. "D-trace Precision Matrix Estimation Using Adaptive Lasso Penalties," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 21775, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    14. Rub'en Loaiza-Maya & Didier Nibbering, 2022. "Fast variational Bayes methods for multinomial probit models," Papers 2202.12495, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    15. Hajargasht, Gholamreza & Rao, D.S. Prasada, 2019. "Multilateral index number systems for international price comparisons: Properties, existence and uniqueness," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 36-47.
    16. Grazzini, Jakob & Richiardi, Matteo G. & Tsionas, Mike, 2017. "Bayesian estimation of agent-based models," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 26-47.
    17. Hemant Kulkarni & Jayabrata Biswas & Kiranmoy Das, 2019. "A joint quantile regression model for multiple longitudinal outcomes," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 103(4), pages 453-473, December.
    18. Yeojin Chung & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh & Vincent Dorie & Andrew Gelman & Jingchen Liu, 2013. "A Nondegenerate Penalized Likelihood Estimator for Variance Parameters in Multilevel Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 685-709, October.
    19. Filippo Ferroni & Benjamin Klaus, 2015. "Euro Area business cycles in turbulent times: convergence or decoupling?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(34-35), pages 3791-3815, July.
    20. Loaiza-Maya, Rubén & Smith, Michael Stanley & Nott, David J. & Danaher, Peter J., 2022. "Fast and accurate variational inference for models with many latent variables," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 230(2), pages 339-362.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:128:y:2018:i:c:p:271-291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.