IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v58y2015i4p401-410.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leading the (r)evolution: Succession and leadership rules for re-entrepreneurs

Author

Listed:
  • McEnany, Robert
  • Strutton, David

Abstract

During the next decade-plus, thousands of Baby Boomer entrepreneurs will retire, usually without formal succession plans. Next-generation relatives, former employees, or outsiders will assume leadership of these now-mature enterprises, hopefully bringing their own visions and initiatives and becoming, in every sense, re-entrepreneurs. Re-entrepreneurship describes a process through which a mature enterprise can be made new again. Re-entrepreneurial leaders will encounter challenges that differ radically from those confronted by traditional entrepreneurial leaders. Re-entrepreneurial initiatives necessarily should begin with new visions of what mature organizations might do to become new again; will succeed only if stakeholders commit to that vision; and should culminate with reimagined, restaged, and revitalized enterprises. To secure re-entrepreneurial outcomes, three framing principles are proposed. Each principle is rooted in the theory of Joseph Schumpeter, the godfather of entrepreneurism and creative destruction. Seven re-entrepreneurial rules follow. While grounded in entrepreneurial theory, each rule is based primarily on experiential lessons shared by re-entrepreneurial executives who have previously assumed leadership succession roles inside mature organizations—and subsequently reimagined, restaged, and revitalized, ultimately renewing their firms.

Suggested Citation

  • McEnany, Robert & Strutton, David, 2015. "Leading the (r)evolution: Succession and leadership rules for re-entrepreneurs," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 401-410.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:58:y:2015:i:4:p:401-410
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2015.03.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681315000348
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bushor.2015.03.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harvey James, 1999. "Owner as Manager, Extended Horizons and the Family Firm," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 41-55.
    2. James J. Chrisman & Jess H. Chua & Lloyd P. Steier, 2011. "Resilience of Family Firms: An Introduction," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(6), pages 1107-1119, November.
    3. Marshall, James P. & Sorenson, Ritch & Brigham, Keith & Wieling, Elizabeth & Reifman, Alan & Wampler, Richard S., 2006. "The paradox for the family firm CEO: Owner age relationship to succession-related processes and plans," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 348-368, May.
    4. Strutton, David, 2004. "The courtly path to managerial leadership," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 7-18.
    5. Loewenstein, George & Thaler, Richard H, 1989. "Intertemporal Choice," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 3(4), pages 181-193, Fall.
    6. Morris, Michael H. & Williams, Roy O. & Allen, Jeffrey A. & Avila, Ramon A., 1997. "Correlates of success in family business transitions," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 12(5), pages 385-401, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuliya Snihur & Llewellyn D. W. Thomas & Raghu Garud & Nelson Phillips, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Framing: A Literature Review and Future Research Directions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 578-606, May.
    2. Zhao Wang & Xiaobing Liu & Qinhua Liu, 2019. "Study of the Relationship between Political Connections and Corporate Re-Entrepreneurial Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-28, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shujun Ding & Zhenyu Wu, 2014. "Family Ownership and Corporate Misconduct in U.S. Small Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(2), pages 183-195, August.
    2. Jörn Hendrich Block & Andreas Thams, 2007. "Long-Term Orientation In Family And Non-Family Firms: A Bayesian Analysis," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2007-059, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
    3. Umans, Ine & Lybaert, Nadine & Steijvers, Tensie & Voordeckers, Wim, 2021. "The influence of transgenerational succession intentions on the succession planning process: The moderating role of high-quality relationships," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(2).
    4. Aleš Kubíček & Ondřej Machek, 2019. "Gender-related factors in family business succession: a systematic literature review," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 963-1002, November.
    5. Ivan Miroshnychenko & Alfredo De Massis & Danny Miller & Roberto Barontini, 2021. "Family Business Growth Around the World," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(4), pages 682-708, July.
    6. Lucía Garcés-Galdeano & Martin Larraza-Kintana & Cristina Cruz & Ignacio Contín-Pilart, 2017. "Just about money? CEO satisfaction and firm performance in small family firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 825-839, December.
    7. Jonathan Bauweraerts, 2016. "How Do Family Firms Manage Risky Situations? An Organizational Resilience Perspective," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(5), pages 1-10, May.
    8. Christian Hoffmann & Peter Jaskiewicz & Torsten Wulf & James G. Combs, 2019. "The Effect of Transgenerational Control Intention on Family-Firm Performance: It Depends Who Pursues It," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(3), pages 629-646, May.
    9. Isabelle Le Breton-Miller & Danny Miller, 2011. "Commentary: Family Firms and the Advantage of Multitemporality," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(6), pages 1171-1177, November.
    10. George S. Vozikis & Eric W. Liguori & Brian Gibson & K. M. Weaver, 2012. "Reducing the Hindering Forces in Intra-Family Business Succession," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 4(1), pages 94-104, March.
    11. Cristina Bettinelli & Marco Mismetti & Alfredo De Massis & Barbara Del Bosco, 2022. "A Review of Conflict and Cohesion in Social Relationships in Family Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 539-577, May.
    12. G. T. Lumpkin & Keith H. Brigham, 2011. "Long–Term Orientation and Intertemporal Choice in Family Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(6), pages 1149-1169, November.
    13. Basco, Rodrigo, 2013. "The family's effect on family firm performance: A model testing the demographic and essence approaches," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 42-66.
    14. Mattias Nordqvist & Karl Wennberg & Massimo Bau’ & Karin Hellerstedt, 2013. "An entrepreneurial process perspective on succession in family firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 1087-1122, May.
    15. Shikha Bhardwaj & Sumedha Chauhan & Parul Gupta, 2023. "CEO Succession in Family Firm: An Integrated Framework and Future Research Insights," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 32(3), pages 667-699, November.
    16. Simone Chlosta & Holger Patzelt & Sabine Klein & Christian Dormann, 2012. "Parental role models and the decision to become self-employed: The moderating effect of personality," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 121-138, January.
    17. James J. Chrisman & Jess H. Chua & Lloyd P. Steier, 2011. "Resilience of Family Firms: An Introduction," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(6), pages 1107-1119, November.
    18. Norman Henderson & Ian Bateman, 1995. "Empirical and public choice evidence for hyperbolic social discount rates and the implications for intergenerational discounting," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 5(4), pages 413-423, June.
    19. Cosmo, Valeria Di & O’Hora, Denis, 2017. "Nudging electricity consumption using TOU pricing and feedback: evidence from Irish households," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1-14.
    20. repec:cup:judgdm:v:16:y:2021:i:3:p:709-728 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Chan-Jane Lin & Tawei Wang & Chao-Jung Pan, 2016. "Financial reporting quality and investment decisions for family firms," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 499-532, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:58:y:2015:i:4:p:401-410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.