IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v86y2009i7-8p1290-1300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An improvement of Hardy Cross method applied on looped spatial natural gas distribution networks

Author

Listed:
  • Brkic, Dejan

Abstract

Hardy Cross method is common for calculation of loops-like gas distribution networks with known node gas consumptions. This method is given in two forms: original Hardy Cross method-successive substitution methods and improved-simultaneous solution method (Newton-Raphson group of methods). Problem of gas flow in looped network is nonlinear problem; i.e. relation between flow and pressure drop is not linear while relation between electric current and voltage is. Improvement of original method is done by introduction of influence of adjacent contours in Yacobian matrix which is used in calculation and which is in original method strictly diagonal with all zeros in non-diagonal terms. In that way necessary number of iteration in calculations is decreased. If during the design of gas network with loops is anticipated that some of conduits are crossing each other without connection, this sort of network became, so there has to be introduced corrections of third or higher order.

Suggested Citation

  • Brkic, Dejan, 2009. "An improvement of Hardy Cross method applied on looped spatial natural gas distribution networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(7-8), pages 1290-1300, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:86:y:2009:i:7-8:p:1290-1300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306-2619(08)00250-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manojlovic, V. & Arsenovic, M. & Pajovic, V., 1994. "Optimized design of a gas-distribution pipeline network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 217-224.
    2. M. Collins & L. Cooper & R. Helgason & J. Kennington & L. LeBlanc, 1978. "Solving the Pipe Network Analysis Problem Using Optimization Techniques," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(7), pages 747-760, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dejan Brkić & Pavel Praks, 2018. "Accurate and Efficient Explicit Approximations of the Colebrook Flow Friction Equation Based on the Wright ω-Function," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Nikolay Novitsky & Egor Mikhailovsky, 2021. "Generalization of Methods for Calculating Steady-State Flow Distribution in Pipeline Networks for Non-Conventional Flow Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Zhong, Wei & Feng, Hongcui & Wang, Xuguang & Wu, Dingfei & Xue, Minghua & Wang, Jian, 2015. "Online hydraulic calculation and operation optimization of industrial steam heating networks considering heat dissipation in pipes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 566-577.
    4. Vadim Fetisov & Aleksey V. Shalygin & Svetlana A. Modestova & Vladimir K. Tyan & Changjin Shao, 2022. "Development of a Numerical Method for Calculating a Gas Supply System during a Period of Change in Thermal Loads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Yan, Aibin & Zhao, Jun & An, Qingsong & Zhao, Yulong & Li, Hailong & Huang, Yrjö Jun, 2013. "Hydraulic performance of a new district heating systems with distributed variable speed pumps," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 876-885.
    6. Li, Jiaxi & Wang, Dan & Jia, Hongjie & Lei, Yang & Zhou, Tianshuo & Guo, Ying, 2022. "Mechanism analysis and unified calculation model of exergy flow distribution in regional integrated energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    7. Jan Vysocký & Ladislav Foltyn & Dejan Brkić & Renáta Praksová & Pavel Praks, 2022. "Steady-State Analysis of Electrical Networks in Pandapower Software: Computational Performances of Newton–Raphson, Newton–Raphson with Iwamoto Multiplier, and Gauss–Seidel Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-12, February.
    8. Mohsin, R. & Majid, Z.A. & Yusof, M.Z., 2014. "Safety distance between underground natural gas and water pipeline facilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 53-60.
    9. Askari, S. & Montazerin, N. & Zarandi, M.H. Fazel, 2015. "Forecasting semi-dynamic response of natural gas networks to nodal gas consumptions using genetic fuzzy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 252-266.
    10. Zheng, Xuejing & Sun, Qihang & Wang, Yaran & Zheng, Lijun & Gao, Xinyong & You, Shijun & Zhang, Huan & Shi, Kaiyu, 2021. "Thermo-hydraulic coupled simulation and analysis of a real large-scale complex district heating network in Tianjin," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lars Schewe & Martin Schmidt & Johannes Thürauf, 2020. "Computing technical capacities in the European entry-exit gas market is NP-hard," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 295(1), pages 337-362, December.
    2. Hong, Sung-Pil & Kim, Taegyoon & Lee, Subin, 2019. "A precision pump schedule optimization for the water supply networks with small buffers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 24-37.
    3. J. David Allen & Richard V. Helgason & Jeffery L. Kennington, 1987. "The frequency assignment problem: A solution via nonlinear programming," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(1), pages 133-139, February.
    4. Fränk Plein & Johannes Thürauf & Martine Labbé & Martin Schmidt, 2022. "A bilevel optimization approach to decide the feasibility of bookings in the European gas market," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 95(3), pages 409-449, June.
    5. Lars Schewe & Martin Schmidt & Johannes Thürauf, 2022. "Global optimization for the multilevel European gas market system with nonlinear flow models on trees," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 82(3), pages 627-653, March.
    6. Ralf Lenz & Kai Helge Becker, 2022. "Optimization of capacity expansion in potential-driven networks including multiple looping: a comparison of modelling approaches," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(1), pages 179-224, March.
    7. Marins, Fernando A. S. & Senne, Edson L. F. & Darby-Dowman, Ken & Machado, Arlene F. & Perin, Clovis, 1997. "Algorithms for network piecewise-linear programs: A comparative study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 183-199, February.
    8. Spyros Kontogiorgis, 2000. "Practical Piecewise-Linear Approximation for Monotropic Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 324-340, November.
    9. Jesco Humpola & Armin Fügenschuh, 2015. "Convex reformulations for solving a nonlinear network design problem," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 717-759, December.
    10. Antoine Gautier & Frieda Granot, 1996. "Ripples, complements, and substitutes in generalized networks," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(1), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Lonnie Turpin & Barron Brown, 2021. "On Reworks in a Serial Process with Flexible Windows of Time," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 1-13, June.
    12. Martin Robinius & Lars Schewe & Martin Schmidt & Detlef Stolten & Johannes Thürauf & Lara Welder, 2019. "Robust optimal discrete arc sizing for tree-shaped potential networks," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 791-819, July.
    13. D’Ambrosio, Claudia & Lodi, Andrea & Wiese, Sven & Bragalli, Cristiana, 2015. "Mathematical programming techniques in water network optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 774-788.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:86:y:2009:i:7-8:p:1290-1300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.