IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v299y2021ics0306261921007017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A surrogate-model-based approach for estimating the first and second-order moments of offshore wind power

Author

Listed:
  • Golparvar, Behzad
  • Papadopoulos, Petros
  • Ezzat, Ahmed Aziz
  • Wang, Ruo-Qian

Abstract

Power curve, the functional relationship that governs the process of converting a set of weather variables experienced by a wind turbine into electric power, is widely used in the wind industry to estimate power output for planning and operational purposes. Existing methods for power curve estimation have three main limitations: (i) they mostly rely on wind speed as the sole input, thus ignoring the secondary, yet possibly significant effects of other environmental factors, (ii) they largely overlook the complex marine environment in which offshore turbines operate, potentially compromising their value in offshore wind energy applications, and (ii) they solely focus on the first-order properties of wind power, with little (or null) information about the variation around the mean behavior, which is important for ensuring reliable grid integration, asset health monitoring, and energy storage, among others. In light of that, this study investigates the impact of several wind-and wave-related factors on offshore wind power variability, with the ultimate goal of accurately predicting its first two moments. Our approach couples OpenFAST—a multi-physics wind turbine simulator—with Gaussian Process (GP) regression to reveal the underlying relationships governing offshore weather-to-power conversion. We first find that a multi-input power curve which captures the combined impact of wind speed, direction, and air density, can provide double-digit improvements, in terms of prediction accuracy, relative to univariate methods which rely on wind speed as the sole explanatory variable (e.g. the standard method of bins). Wave-related variables are found not important for predicting the average power output, but interestingly, appear to be extremely relevant in describing the fluctuation of the offshore power around its mean. Tested on real-world data collected at the New York/New Jersey bight, our proposed multi-input models demonstrate a high explanatory power in predicting the first two moments of offshore wind generation, testifying their potential value to the offshore wind industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Golparvar, Behzad & Papadopoulos, Petros & Ezzat, Ahmed Aziz & Wang, Ruo-Qian, 2021. "A surrogate-model-based approach for estimating the first and second-order moments of offshore wind power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:299:y:2021:i:c:s0306261921007017
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261921007017
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117286?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Min & Wang, Ruo-Qian & Jia, Gaofeng, 2020. "Efficient dimension reduction and surrogate-based sensitivity analysis for expensive models with high-dimensional outputs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    2. Niu, Briana & Hwangbo, Hoon & Zeng, Li & Ding, Yu, 2018. "Evaluation of alternative power production efficiency metrics for offshore wind turbines and farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PA), pages 81-90.
    3. Jooyoung Jeon & James W. Taylor, 2012. "Using Conditional Kernel Density Estimation for Wind Power Density Forecasting," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(497), pages 66-79, March.
    4. Giwhyun Lee & Yu Ding & Marc G. Genton & Le Xie, 2015. "Power Curve Estimation With Multivariate Environmental Factors for Inland and Offshore Wind Farms," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 56-67, March.
    5. Aziz Ezzat, Ahmed, 2020. "Turbine-specific short-term wind speed forecasting considering within-farm wind field dependencies and fluctuations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    6. Ouyang, Tinghui & Kusiak, Andrew & He, Yusen, 2017. "Modeling wind-turbine power curve: A data partitioning and mining approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PA), pages 1-8.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hu, Shen & Zhao, Daoli & Sun, Weipeng & Liu, Yuanyuan & Ma, Chenyuan, 2023. "Investigation on galloping piezoelectric energy harvester considering the surface roughness in low velocity water flow," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    2. Yuan, Quan & Ye, Yujian & Tang, Yi & Liu, Yuanchang & Strbac, Goran, 2022. "A novel deep-learning based surrogate modeling of stochastic electric vehicle traffic user equilibrium in low-carbon electricity–transportation nexus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    3. Nasery, Praanjal & Aziz Ezzat, Ahmed, 2023. "Yaw-adjusted wind power curve modeling: A local regression approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 1368-1376.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nasery, Praanjal & Aziz Ezzat, Ahmed, 2023. "Yaw-adjusted wind power curve modeling: A local regression approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 1368-1376.
    2. Yang, Dazhi & van der Meer, Dennis, 2021. "Post-processing in solar forecasting: Ten overarching thinking tools," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    3. Hu, Yang & Xi, Yunhua & Pan, Chenyang & Li, Gengda & Chen, Baowei, 2020. "Daily condition monitoring of grid-connected wind turbine via high-fidelity power curve and its comprehensive rating," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2095-2111.
    4. Wang, Yun & Duan, Xiaocong & Zou, Runmin & Zhang, Fan & Li, Yifen & Hu, Qinghua, 2023. "A novel data-driven deep learning approach for wind turbine power curve modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    5. Aziz Ezzat, Ahmed, 2020. "Turbine-specific short-term wind speed forecasting considering within-farm wind field dependencies and fluctuations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    6. Famoso, Fabio & Brusca, Sebastian & D'Urso, Diego & Galvagno, Antonio & Chiacchio, Ferdinando, 2020. "A novel hybrid model for the estimation of energy conversion in a wind farm combining wake effects and stochastic dependability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    7. Mehrjoo, Mehrdad & Jafari Jozani, Mohammad & Pawlak, Miroslaw, 2021. "Toward hybrid approaches for wind turbine power curve modeling with balanced loss functions and local weighting schemes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    8. Torii, André Jacomel & Novotny, Antonio André, 2021. "A priori error estimates for local reliability-based sensitivity analysis with Monte Carlo Simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    9. Giani, Paolo & Tagle, Felipe & Genton, Marc G. & Castruccio, Stefano & Crippa, Paola, 2020. "Closing the gap between wind energy targets and implementation for emerging countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    10. Gonzalez, Elena & Stephen, Bruce & Infield, David & Melero, Julio J., 2019. "Using high-frequency SCADA data for wind turbine performance monitoring: A sensitivity study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 841-853.
    11. Haben, Stephen & Giasemidis, Georgios, 2016. "A hybrid model of kernel density estimation and quantile regression for GEFCom2014 probabilistic load forecasting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 1017-1022.
    12. López-Lopera, Andrés F. & Idier, Déborah & Rohmer, Jérémy & Bachoc, François, 2022. "Multioutput Gaussian processes with functional data: A study on coastal flood hazard assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    13. Mateusz Ciski & Krzysztof Rząsa & Marek Ogryzek, 2019. "Use of GIS Tools in Sustainable Heritage Management—The Importance of Data Generalization in Spatial Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-21, October.
    14. Tang, Zhenhao & Zhao, Gengnan & Ouyang, Tinghui, 2021. "Two-phase deep learning model for short-term wind direction forecasting," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1005-1016.
    15. Jung, WoongHee & Taflanidis, Alexandros A., 2023. "Efficient global sensitivity analysis for high-dimensional outputs combining data-driven probability models and dimensionality reduction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    16. Ding, Yu & Kumar, Nitesh & Prakash, Abhinav & Kio, Adaiyibo E. & Liu, Xin & Liu, Lei & Li, Qingchang, 2021. "A case study of space-time performance comparison of wind turbines on a wind farm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 735-746.
    17. Yang Hu & Yilin Qiao & Jingchun Chu & Ling Yuan & Lei Pan, 2019. "Joint Point-Interval Prediction and Optimization of Wind Power Considering the Sequential Uncertainties of Stepwise Procedure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, June.
    18. Houssem R. E. H. Bouchekara & Yusuf A. Sha’aban & Mohammad S. Shahriar & Makbul A. M. Ramli & Abdullahi A. Mas’ud, 2023. "Wind Farm Layout Optimization/Expansion with Real Wind Turbines Using a Multi-Objective EA Based on an Enhanced Inverted Generational Distance Metric Combined with the Two-Archive Algorithm 2," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-32, January.
    19. Wolf-Gerrit Früh, 2023. "Assessing the Performance of Small Wind Energy Systems Using Regional Weather Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-21, April.
    20. Ouyang, Tinghui & Kusiak, Andrew & He, Yusen, 2017. "Predictive model of yaw error in a wind turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 119-130.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:299:y:2021:i:c:s0306261921007017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.