IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v292y2021ics0306261921003834.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting embodied carbon emissions from purchased electricity for United States counties

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Li
  • Wemhoff, Aaron P.

Abstract

Predicting the embodied scope 3 carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions from purchased electricity for end users in the United States is challenging due to electricity transmission within interconnected power grids. Existing methods only focus on large aggregation areas, thereby ignoring potentially significant emission factor (EF) variations, so this study proposes a novel method to translate the CO2e emissions from the balancing authority (BA)-level to the county-level by utilizing explicit finite-difference theory for electricity flow predictions, and then employing economic input–output theory to evaluate the scope 3 embodied lifecycle CO2e emissions. Results show that the generation-based EFs at the BA-level range from 0.007 to 0.905 MT-CO2e/MWh with a mean value of 0.400 MT-CO2e/MWh and a standard deviation of 0.229 MT-CO2e/MWh. The consumption-based EFs at the BA-level range from 0.008 to 0.836 MT-CO2e/MWh with a mean value of 0.378 MT-CO2e/MWh and a standard deviation of 0.019 MT-CO2e/MWh. Results also show that sixteen BA consumption-based EFs deviate by more than 20% compared to their generation-based EFs, which indicates the significance of accounting for electricity interchanges in emissions quantification processes. A larger range of possible consumption-based EFs is revealed at the county-level: 0.007 to 0.902 MT-CO2e/MWh, with a mean value of 0.452 MT-CO2e/MWh and a standard deviation of 0.123 MT-CO2e/MWh. Results also indicate significant variations in EFs of counties within each BA: 20 BAs have county-level EFs range greater than 0.1 MT-CO2e/MWh, 13 BAs have county-level EFs range greater than 0.2 MT-CO2e/MWh and 6 BAs have county-level EFs range beyond 0.3 MT-CO2e/MWh.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Li & Wemhoff, Aaron P., 2021. "Predicting embodied carbon emissions from purchased electricity for United States counties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:292:y:2021:i:c:s0306261921003834
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261921003834
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116898?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cruijssen, Frans & 't Hoofd, Dirk, 2020. "Inventarisatie Praktijkimpact 4C," Other publications TiSEM f3cbf8a6-d050-474f-b24f-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. ., 2020. "Inventing innovation policy," Chapters, in: The Idea of Technological Innovation, chapter 7, pages 96-114, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. ., 2020. "New invention disclosures," Chapters, in: Invention, Innovation and U.S. Federal Laboratories, chapter 2, pages 15-30, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Gerlagh, Reyer & Hejimans, Roweno J. R. K. & Rosendahl, Knut Einar, 2020. "Endogenous Emission Caps Always Produce a Green Paradox," Working Paper Series 4-2020, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, School of Economics and Business.
    5. Qu, Shen & Wang, Hongxia & Liang, Sai & Shapiro, Avi M. & Suh, Sanwong & Sheldon, Seth & Zik, Ory & Fang, Hong & Xu, Ming, 2017. "A Quasi-Input-Output model to improve the estimation of emission factors for purchased electricity from interconnected grids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 249-259.
    6. ., 2020. "Experiences and inventive ideas," Chapters, in: Invention, Innovation and U.S. Federal Laboratories, chapter 3, pages 31-48, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Ana-Isabel Guerra & Ferran Sancho, 2010. "A Comparison Of Input-Output Models:Ghosh Reduces To Leontief (But 'Closing' Ghosh Makes It More Plausible)," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 823.10, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
    8. ., 2020. "Inventive ideas as a driver of technology transfer," Chapters, in: Invention, Innovation and U.S. Federal Laboratories, chapter 5, pages 65-78, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Di Maria, Corrado & Zarkovic, Maja & Hintermann, Beat, 2020. "Are Emissions Trading Schemes Cost-effective?," Working papers 2020/13, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    10. ., 2020. "The genesis of inventive ideas," Chapters, in: Invention, Innovation and U.S. Federal Laboratories, chapter 1, pages 1-14, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Chaparro, Iván & Watts, David & Gil, Esteban, 2017. "Modeling marginal CO2 emissions in hydrothermal systems: Efficient carbon signals for renewables," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 318-331.
    12. Joseph S. Colett & Jarod C. Kelly & Gregory A. Keoleian, 2016. "Using Nested Average Electricity Allocation Protocols to Characterize Electrical Grids in Life Cycle Assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 20(1), pages 29-41, February.
    13. Yan, Kai & Zhang, Wei & Shen, Dehua, 2020. "Stylized facts of the carbon emission market in China," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 555(C).
    14. Dotzauer, Erik, 2010. "Greenhouse gas emissions from power generation and consumption in a nordic perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 701-704, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pfadt-Trilling, Alyssa R. & Widyolar, Bennett K. & Jiang, Lun & Brinkley, Jordyn & Bhusal, Yogesh & Winston, Roland & Fortier, Marie-Odile P., 2023. "Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of low-temperature process heat generation by external compound parabolic concentrator (XCPC) solar thermal array," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 992-998.
    2. Wei Shi & Wenwen Tang & Fuwei Qiao & Zhiquan Sha & Chengyuan Wang & Sixue Zhao, 2022. "How to Reduce Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Power Systems in Gansu Province—Analyze from the Life Cycle Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Miroslav Variny & Dominika Jediná & Miroslav Rimár & Ján Kizek & Marianna Kšiňanová, 2021. "Cutting Oxygen Production-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Improved Compression Heat Management in a Cryogenic Air Separation Unit," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-32, October.
    4. Yongmao Xiao & Renqing Zhao & Wei Yan & Xiaoyong Zhu, 2022. "Analysis and Evaluation of Energy Consumption and Carbon Emission Levels of Products Produced by Different Kinds of Equipment Based on Green Development Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Guoyin Xu & Tong Zhao & Rong Wang, 2022. "Research on Carbon Emission Efficiency Measurement and Regional Difference Evaluation of China’s Regional Transportation Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Haoran & Li, Ruixiong & Cai, Xingrui & Zheng, Chaoyue & Liu, Laibao & Liu, Maodian & Zhang, Qianru & Lin, Huiming & Chen, Long & Wang, Xuejun, 2022. "Do electricity flows hamper regional economic–environmental equity?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    2. Onat, Nuri Cihat & Kucukvar, Murat & Tatari, Omer, 2015. "Conventional, hybrid, plug-in hybrid or electric vehicles? State-based comparative carbon and energy footprint analysis in the United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 36-49.
    3. Reyer Gerlagh & Roweno J. R. K. Heijmans & Knut Einar Rosendahl, 2020. "COVID-19 Tests the Market Stability Reserve," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(4), pages 855-865, August.
    4. Knuepfer, K. & Rogalski, N. & Knuepfer, A. & Esteban, M. & Shibayama, T., 2022. "A reliable energy system for Japan with merit order dispatch, high variable renewable share and no nuclear power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    5. Joakim Haraldsson & Simon Johnsson & Patrik Thollander & Magnus Wallén, 2021. "Taxonomy, Saving Potentials and Key Performance Indicators for Energy End-Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Aluminium Industry and Aluminium Casting Foundries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    6. Purnomo, Agung, 2022. "Desa Wirausaha sebagai Eskalasi Ekonomi Desa berbasis Kewirausahaan," OSF Preprints np629, Center for Open Science.
    7. Gebremedhin, Alemayehu & De Oliveira Granheim, Jarle, 2012. "Is there a space for additional renewable energy in the Norwegian power system? Potential for reduced global emission?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 1611-1615.
    8. Costa, C.M. & Barbosa, J.C. & Castro, H. & Gonçalves, R. & Lanceros-Méndez, S., 2021. "Electric vehicles: To what extent are environmentally friendly and cost effective? – Comparative study by european countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    9. Hengjing He & Shangli Zhou & Leping Zhang & Wei Zhao & Xia Xiao, 2023. "Dynamic Accounting Model and Method for Carbon Emissions on the Power Grid Side," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-10, June.
    10. Zhou, Xi-Yin & Xu, Zhicheng & Zheng, Jialin & Zhou, Ya & Lei, Kun & Fu, Jiafeng & Khu, Soon-Thiam & Yang, Junfeng, 2023. "Internal spillover effect of carbon emission between transportation sectors and electricity generation sectors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 356-366.
    11. Razzaq, Asif & Sharif, Arshian & An, Hui & Aloui, Chaker, 2022. "Testing the directional predictability between carbon trading and sectoral stocks in China: New insights using cross-quantilogram and rolling window causality approaches," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    12. Yanfeng Li & Yongping Li & Guohe Huang & Rubing Zheng, 2022. "Inter-Provincial Electricity Trading and Its Effects on Carbon Emissions from the Power Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    13. Haoran Zhang & Limin Jiao & Cai Li & Zhongci Deng & Zhen Wang & Qiqi Jia & Xihong Lian & Yaolin Liu & Yuanchao Hu, 2024. "Global environmental impacts of food system from regional shock: Russia-Ukraine war as an example," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Ji, Ling & Liang, Sai & Qu, Shen & Zhang, Yanxia & Xu, Ming & Jia, Xiaoping & Jia, Yingtao & Niu, Dongxiao & Yuan, Jiahai & Hou, Yong & Wang, Haikun & Chiu, Anthony S.F. & Hu, Xiaojun, 2016. "Greenhouse gas emission factors of purchased electricity from interconnected grids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 751-758.
    15. Zhu, Bangzhu & Su, Bin & Li, Yingzhu, 2018. "Input-output and structural decomposition analysis of India’s carbon emissions and intensity, 2007/08 – 2013/14," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 1545-1556.
    16. Gebremedhin, Alemayehu, 2012. "Introducing District Heating in a Norwegian town – Potential for reduced Local and Global Emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 300-304.
    17. Muhammad Awais Gulzar & Haroon Asghar & Jinsoo Hwang & Waseem Hassan, 2020. "China’s Pathway towards Solar Energy Utilization: Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-11, June.
    18. Olsson, Linda & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Söderström, Mats, 2015. "Assessing the climate impact of district heating systems with combined heat and power production and industrial excess heat," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 31-39.
    19. Wenbo Li & Ruyin Long & Linling Zhang & Zhengxia He & Feiyu Chen & Hong Chen, 2020. "Greenhouse Gas Emission Transfer of Inter-Provincial Electricity Trade in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-14, November.
    20. Zhang, Pengfei & Cai, Wenqiu & Yao, Mingtao & Wang, Zhiyou & Yang, Luzhen & Wei, Wendong, 2020. "Urban carbon emissions associated with electricity consumption in Beijing and the driving factors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:292:y:2021:i:c:s0306261921003834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.