IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v235y2019icp1226-1234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical estimates of the radiative impact of an unusually extreme dust and wildfire episode on the performance of a photovoltaic plant in Western Mediterranean

Author

Listed:
  • Gómez-Amo, J.L.
  • Freile-Aranda, M.D.
  • Camarasa, J.
  • Estellés, V.
  • Utrillas, M.P.
  • Martínez-Lozano, J.A.

Abstract

We have estimated the radiative impact produced by an unusually extreme dust and wildfire episode on the performance of a photovoltaic (PV) plant. The dust and wildfire events were mostly active on 26–28 and 29–30 June 2012, respectively. We took advantage of the consecutiveness of both events to separate and derive empirically the radiative effect of dust and smoke aerosols. With this purpose, we employed measurements of aerosol load, radiation and PV power output from a collocated atmospheric station and PV plant located at Burjassot (Valencia, Spain). The empirical estimates were obtained by direct comparison with a summer background day, happened right before the two consecutive case studies. The whole episode is characterized by high aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 500 nm, reaching values up to 1 and 6 for dust and smoke, respectively. Our analysis shows an average daily energy loss of −132 kWh, that represents a fraction of 20% of the energy generated by the PV plant on the reference summer background day. A significant fraction of the energy lost was due to smoke, with a daily maximum of 43% and a daily average of 34%. In case of dust, the energy reduction was moderated, with a daily average of 6%. In terms of instantaneous power reduction, we have obtained peaks of 8 and 51% for dust and smoke, respectively. The energy reduction due to aerosols is strongly dependent on AOD. Further, we have found that the power loss per unit of AOD at 870 nm is useful to separate the radiative impact of different aerosol types. Essentially, the efficiency of smoke to reduce the energy generated by the PV plant is much greater than that of dust. This effect is mainly due to the different optical properties in the near infrared that result in a daily Power Aerosol Forcing Efficiency at 870 nm of −5.7 and −19.1 kW, for dust and smoke, respectively. Our results indicate that both the AOD and aerosol type drive the radiative impact of aerosols on the PV output, confirming that extreme aerosol events may drastically reduce the power generated by operative PV plants. This reduction may be as large as that reported for particle soiling. Therefore, considering both amount and type of aerosols in the PV power analyses is mandatory in order to obtain accurate forecast scenarios and improve the grid integration, especially during extreme episodes.

Suggested Citation

  • Gómez-Amo, J.L. & Freile-Aranda, M.D. & Camarasa, J. & Estellés, V. & Utrillas, M.P. & Martínez-Lozano, J.A., 2019. "Empirical estimates of the radiative impact of an unusually extreme dust and wildfire episode on the performance of a photovoltaic plant in Western Mediterranean," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1226-1234.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:235:y:2019:i:c:p:1226-1234
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261918317586
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruiz-Arias, J.A. & Terrados, J. & Pérez-Higueras, P. & Pozo-Vázquez, D. & Almonacid, G., 2012. "Assessment of the renewable energies potential for intensive electricity production in the province of Jaén, southern Spain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2994-3001.
    2. Das, Utpal Kumar & Tey, Kok Soon & Seyedmahmoudian, Mehdi & Mekhilef, Saad & Idris, Moh Yamani Idna & Van Deventer, Willem & Horan, Bend & Stojcevski, Alex, 2018. "Forecasting of photovoltaic power generation and model optimization: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 912-928.
    3. Sun, Ke & Lu, Lin & Jiang, Yu & Wang, Yuanhao & Zhou, Kun & He, Zhu, 2018. "Integrated effects of PM2.5 deposition, module surface conditions and nanocoatings on solar PV surface glass transmittance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 4107-4120.
    4. Gómez, Antonio & Zubizarreta, Javier & Dopazo, César & Fueyo, Norberto, 2011. "Spanish energy roadmap to 2020: Socioeconomic implications of renewable targets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1973-1985.
    5. Gaetani, Marco & Huld, Thomas & Vignati, Elisabetta & Monforti-Ferrario, Fabio & Dosio, Alessandro & Raes, Frank, 2014. "The near future availability of photovoltaic energy in Europe and Africa in climate-aerosol modeling experiments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 706-716.
    6. Yang, Xiuyuan & Xu, Minglu & Xu, Shouchen & Han, Xiaojuan, 2017. "Day-ahead forecasting of photovoltaic output power with similar cloud space fusion based on incomplete historical data mining," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 683-696.
    7. Utrillas, M.P. & Pedrós, R. & Gandía, S. & Gómez-Amo, J.L. & Estellés, V. & Martínez-Lozano, J.A., 2015. "Measurements of integrated direct, diffuse and global ultraviolet-B radiation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1658-1662.
    8. Liu, Luyao & Zhao, Yi & Chang, Dongliang & Xie, Jiyang & Ma, Zhanyu & Sun, Qie & Yin, Hongyi & Wennersten, Ronald, 2018. "Prediction of short-term PV power output and uncertainty analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 700-711.
    9. Moreno-Sáez, Rafael & Sidrach-de-Cardona, Mariano & Mora-López, Llanos, 2016. "Analysis and characterization of photovoltaic modules of three different thin-film technologies in outdoor conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 827-838.
    10. Sarver, Travis & Al-Qaraghuli, Ali & Kazmerski, Lawrence L., 2013. "A comprehensive review of the impact of dust on the use of solar energy: History, investigations, results, literature, and mitigation approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 698-733.
    11. Li, Yanting & He, Yong & Su, Yan & Shu, Lianjie, 2016. "Forecasting the daily power output of a grid-connected photovoltaic system based on multivariate adaptive regression splines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 392-401.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Conceição, Ricardo & González-Aguilar, José & Merrouni, Ahmed Alami & Romero, Manuel, 2022. "Soiling effect in solar energy conversion systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    2. Rafi Zahedi & Parisa Ranjbaran & Gevork B. Gharehpetian & Fazel Mohammadi & Roya Ahmadiahangar, 2021. "Cleaning of Floating Photovoltaic Systems: A Critical Review on Approaches from Technical and Economic Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Gilletly, Samuel D. & Jackson, Nicole D. & Staid, Andrea, 2023. "Evaluating the impact of wildfire smoke on solar photovoltaic production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    4. Mladen Bošnjaković & Marinko Stojkov & Marko Katinić & Ivica Lacković, 2023. "Effects of Extreme Weather Conditions on PV Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Seung Min Kim & Kenneth Gillingham, 2024. "Air Pollution and Solar Energy: Evidence from Wildfires," CESifo Working Paper Series 10948, CESifo.
    6. Song, Zhe & Liu, Jia & Yang, Hongxing, 2021. "Air pollution and soiling implications for solar photovoltaic power generation: A comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Xiaoyang & Sun, Yunlin & Luo, Duo & Peng, Jinqing, 2022. "Comparative study of machine learning approaches for predicting short-term photovoltaic power output based on weather type classification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    2. Song, Zhe & Liu, Jia & Yang, Hongxing, 2021. "Air pollution and soiling implications for solar photovoltaic power generation: A comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    3. Wang, Kejun & Qi, Xiaoxia & Liu, Hongda, 2019. "A comparison of day-ahead photovoltaic power forecasting models based on deep learning neural network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Aina Maimó-Far & Alexis Tantet & Víctor Homar & Philippe Drobinski, 2020. "Predictable and Unpredictable Climate Variability Impacts on Optimal Renewable Energy Mixes: The Example of Spain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Zhou, Yi & Zhou, Nanrun & Gong, Lihua & Jiang, Minlin, 2020. "Prediction of photovoltaic power output based on similar day analysis, genetic algorithm and extreme learning machine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    6. Conceição, Ricardo & González-Aguilar, José & Merrouni, Ahmed Alami & Romero, Manuel, 2022. "Soiling effect in solar energy conversion systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    7. Wang, Lining & Mao, Mingxuan & Xie, Jili & Liao, Zheng & Zhang, Hao & Li, Huanxin, 2023. "Accurate solar PV power prediction interval method based on frequency-domain decomposition and LSTM model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    8. Zheng, Lingwei & Liu, Zhaokun & Shen, Junnan & Wu, Chenxi, 2018. "Very short-term maximum Lyapunov exponent forecasting tool for distributed photovoltaic output," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1128-1139.
    9. Huang, Wenfeng & Zhou, Kun & Sun, Ke & He, Zhu, 2019. "Effects of wind flow structure, particle flow and deposition pattern on photovoltaic energy harvest around a block," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Kelachukwu J. Iheanetu, 2022. "Solar Photovoltaic Power Forecasting: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-31, December.
    11. Xu, Fang Yuan & Tang, Rui Xin & Xu, Si Bin & Fan, Yi Liang & Zhou, Ya & Zhang, Hao Tian, 2021. "Neural network-based photovoltaic generation capacity prediction system with benefit-oriented modification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    12. Fernandez, Eduardo F. & Chemisana, Daniel & Micheli, Leonardo & Almonacid, Florencia, 2019. "Spectral nature of soiling and its impact on multi-junction based concentrator systems," MPRA Paper 106251, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Martina Radicioni & Valentina Lucaferri & Francesco De Lia & Antonino Laudani & Roberto Lo Presti & Gabriele Maria Lozito & Francesco Riganti Fulginei & Riccardo Schioppo & Mario Tucci, 2021. "Power Forecasting of a Photovoltaic Plant Located in ENEA Casaccia Research Center," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, January.
    14. Kuen-Suan Chen & Kuo-Ping Lin & Jun-Xiang Yan & Wan-Lin Hsieh, 2019. "Renewable Power Output Forecasting Using Least-Squares Support Vector Regression and Google Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, May.
    15. Rodríguez, Fermín & Galarza, Ainhoa & Vasquez, Juan C. & Guerrero, Josep M., 2022. "Using deep learning and meteorological parameters to forecast the photovoltaic generators intra-hour output power interval for smart grid control," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    16. Mitrentsis, Georgios & Lens, Hendrik, 2022. "An interpretable probabilistic model for short-term solar power forecasting using natural gradient boosting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    17. Li, Chengdong & Zhou, Changgeng & Peng, Wei & Lv, Yisheng & Luo, Xin, 2020. "Accurate prediction of short-term photovoltaic power generation via a novel double-input-rule-modules stacked deep fuzzy method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    18. Gu, Bo & Shen, Huiqiang & Lei, Xiaohui & Hu, Hao & Liu, Xinyu, 2021. "Forecasting and uncertainty analysis of day-ahead photovoltaic power using a novel forecasting method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    19. Sarmas, Elissaios & Spiliotis, Evangelos & Stamatopoulos, Efstathios & Marinakis, Vangelis & Doukas, Haris, 2023. "Short-term photovoltaic power forecasting using meta-learning and numerical weather prediction independent Long Short-Term Memory models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    20. Athanasios I. Salamanis & Georgia Xanthopoulou & Napoleon Bezas & Christos Timplalexis & Angelina D. Bintoudi & Lampros Zyglakis & Apostolos C. Tsolakis & Dimosthenis Ioannidis & Dionysios Kehagias & , 2020. "Benchmark Comparison of Analytical, Data-Based and Hybrid Models for Multi-Step Short-Term Photovoltaic Power Generation Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-31, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:235:y:2019:i:c:p:1226-1234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.