IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v206y2017icp439-450.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing the impact of uncertainties on technical and meteorological parameters in wind power time series modelling in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Monforti, Fabio
  • Gonzalez-Aparicio, Iratxe

Abstract

The adequate modelling of power systems under heavily penetration of Renewable Energy sources crucially depends on the accurate representation of the spatial and temporal features of intermittent power resources supplying the system. In the case of wind energy, two main ingredients are needed for a suitable assessment of its temporal features: a detailed knowledge of the technical parameters of the power generators and the proper description of the physical parameters leading to actual power generation. In this paper we compare the relative weight of uncertainties in the wind power assessment arising from the limited knowledge of the wind farms technical parameters (namely hub height, turbine type and wind farm positioning) with uncertainties originated by the limited description of wind speed fields at hub height provided by meteorological reanalyses. The quantitative comparison of error sources has been achieved by means of a sensitivity analysis taking into consideration the most crucial parameters impacting wind power estimation. The analysis has shown the overwhelming importance of coupling an accurate data base of operating wind farms with a proper representation of the input wind fields at the most possibly detailed level. To our knowledge, this is the first time that the sources of uncertainties for wind power generation estimates have been compared on a continental scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Monforti, Fabio & Gonzalez-Aparicio, Iratxe, 2017. "Comparing the impact of uncertainties on technical and meteorological parameters in wind power time series modelling in the European Union," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 439-450.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:206:y:2017:i:c:p:439-450
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261917312515
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin, Rebecca & Lazakis, Iraklis & Barbouchi, Sami & Johanning, Lars, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis of offshore wind farm operation and maintenance cost and availability," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1226-1236.
    2. González-Aparicio, I. & Zucker, A., 2015. "Impact of wind power uncertainty forecasting on the market integration of wind energy in Spain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 334-349.
    3. Engeland, Kolbjørn & Borga, Marco & Creutin, Jean-Dominique & François, Baptiste & Ramos, Maria-Helena & Vidal, Jean-Philippe, 2017. "Space-time variability of climate variables and intermittent renewable electricity production – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 600-617.
    4. Alessandrini, S. & Delle Monache, L. & Sperati, S. & Nissen, J.N., 2015. "A novel application of an analog ensemble for short-term wind power forecasting," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 768-781.
    5. Rohatgi, Janardan & Barbezier, Gil, 1999. "Wind turbulence and atmospheric stability — Their effect on wind turbine output," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 908-911.
    6. Pfenninger, Stefan, 2017. "Dealing with multiple decades of hourly wind and PV time series in energy models: A comparison of methods to reduce time resolution and the planning implications of inter-annual variability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 1-13.
    7. Maria Grazia De Giorgi & Stefano Campilongo & Antonio Ficarella & Paolo Maria Congedo, 2014. "Comparison Between Wind Power Prediction Models Based on Wavelet Decomposition with Least-Squares Support Vector Machine (LS-SVM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Foley, Aoife M. & Leahy, Paul G. & Marvuglia, Antonino & McKeogh, Eamon J., 2012. "Current methods and advances in forecasting of wind power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 1-8.
    9. Birgir Freyr Ragnarsson & Gudmundur V. Oddsson & Runar Unnthorsson & Birgir Hrafnkelsson, 2015. "Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis of a Wind Power Generation System at Búrfell in Iceland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-22, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gruber, Katharina & Regner, Peter & Wehrle, Sebastian & Zeyringer, Marianne & Schmidt, Johannes, 2022. "Towards global validation of wind power simulations: A multi-country assessment of wind power simulation from MERRA-2 and ERA-5 reanalyses bias-corrected with the global wind atlas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    2. Jung, Christopher & Schindler, Dirk, 2018. "On the inter-annual variability of wind energy generation – A case study from Germany," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 845-854.
    3. Jin, Yuqing & Ju, Ping & Rehtanz, Christian & Wu, Feng & Pan, Xueping, 2018. "Equivalent modeling of wind energy conversion considering overall effect of pitch angle controllers in wind farm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 485-496.
    4. Hayes, Liam & Stocks, Matthew & Blakers, Andrew, 2021. "Accurate long-term power generation model for offshore wind farms in Europe using ERA5 reanalysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    5. Jiang, Ping & Yang, Hufang & Heng, Jiani, 2019. "A hybrid forecasting system based on fuzzy time series and multi-objective optimization for wind speed forecasting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 786-801.
    6. Francisco Haces-Fernandez & Hua Li & David Ramirez, 2022. "Analysis of Wave Energy Behavior and Its Underlying Reasons in the Gulf of Mexico Based on Computer Animation and Energy Events Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Hirth, Lion & Mühlenpfordt, Jonathan & Bulkeley, Marisa, 2018. "The ENTSO-E Transparency Platform – A review of Europe’s most ambitious electricity data platform," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 1054-1067.
    8. Zhang, Hengxu & Cao, Yongji & Zhang, Yi & Terzija, Vladimir, 2018. "Quantitative synergy assessment of regional wind-solar energy resources based on MERRA reanalysis data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 172-182.
    9. Artigao, Estefania & Martín-Martínez, Sergio & Honrubia-Escribano, Andrés & Gómez-Lázaro, Emilio, 2018. "Wind turbine reliability: A comprehensive review towards effective condition monitoring development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1569-1583.
    10. Murcia, Juan Pablo & Koivisto, Matti Juhani & Luzia, Graziela & Olsen, Bjarke T. & Hahmann, Andrea N. & Sørensen, Poul Ejnar & Als, Magnus, 2022. "Validation of European-scale simulated wind speed and wind generation time series," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    11. Huang, Pei & Huang, Gongsheng & Sun, Yongjun, 2018. "Uncertainty-based life-cycle analysis of near-zero energy buildings for performance improvements," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 486-498.
    12. Gualtieri, G., 2022. "Analysing the uncertainties of reanalysis data used for wind resource assessment: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    13. Nguyen, Thi Anh Tuyet & Chou, Shuo-Yan, 2019. "Improved maintenance optimization of offshore wind systems considering effects of government subsidies, lost production and discounted cost model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    14. Kies, Alexander & Schyska, Bruno U. & Bilousova, Mariia & El Sayed, Omar & Jurasz, Jakub & Stoecker, Horst, 2021. "Critical review of renewable generation datasets and their implications for European power system models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    15. Antonio Jiménez-Garrote & Francisco J. Santos-Alamillos & Guadalupe Sánchez-Hernández & Miguel López-Cuesta & José A. Ruiz-Arias & David Pozo-Vázquez, 2024. "Evaluation of a Database of the Spanish Wind Energy Resources Derived from a Regional Reanalysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-25, March.
    16. Song, Feng & Cui, Jian & Yu, Yihua, 2022. "Dynamic volatility spillover effects between wind and solar power generations: Implications for hedging strategies and a sustainable power sector," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Yongning & Ye, Lin & Li, Zhi & Song, Xuri & Lang, Yansheng & Su, Jian, 2016. "A novel bidirectional mechanism based on time series model for wind power forecasting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 793-803.
    2. Kim, Deockho & Hur, Jin, 2018. "Short-term probabilistic forecasting of wind energy resources using the enhanced ensemble method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 211-226.
    3. Shahriari, M. & Cervone, G. & Clemente-Harding, L. & Delle Monache, L., 2020. "Using the analog ensemble method as a proxy measurement for wind power predictability," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 789-801.
    4. González-Sopeña, J.M. & Pakrashi, V. & Ghosh, B., 2021. "An overview of performance evaluation metrics for short-term statistical wind power forecasting," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    5. Qunli Wu & Chenyang Peng, 2016. "Wind Power Generation Forecasting Using Least Squares Support Vector Machine Combined with Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition, Principal Component Analysis and a Bat Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, April.
    6. González-Aparicio, I. & Zucker, A., 2015. "Impact of wind power uncertainty forecasting on the market integration of wind energy in Spain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 334-349.
    7. Qian, Zheng & Pei, Yan & Zareipour, Hamidreza & Chen, Niya, 2019. "A review and discussion of decomposition-based hybrid models for wind energy forecasting applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 939-953.
    8. Vogel, E.E. & Saravia, G. & Kobe, S. & Schumann, R. & Schuster, R., 2018. "A novel method to optimize electricity generation from wind energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 724-735.
    9. Garrido-Perez, Jose M. & Ordóñez, Carlos & Barriopedro, David & García-Herrera, Ricardo & Paredes, Daniel, 2020. "Impact of weather regimes on wind power variability in western Europe," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    10. Qunli Wu & Chenyang Peng, 2015. "Wind Power Grid Connected Capacity Prediction Using LSSVM Optimized by the Bat Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Lahouar, A. & Ben Hadj Slama, J., 2017. "Hour-ahead wind power forecast based on random forests," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 529-541.
    12. Qunli Wu & Chenyang Peng, 2016. "A Least Squares Support Vector Machine Optimized by Cloud-Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Wind Power Generation Prediction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-20, July.
    13. Jannik Schütz Roungkvist & Peter Enevoldsen, 2020. "Timescale classification in wind forecasting: A review of the state‐of‐the‐art," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(5), pages 757-768, August.
    14. Cheng, William Y.Y. & Liu, Yubao & Bourgeois, Alfred J. & Wu, Yonghui & Haupt, Sue Ellen, 2017. "Short-term wind forecast of a data assimilation/weather forecasting system with wind turbine anemometer measurement assimilation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 340-351.
    15. Han, Li & Romero, Carlos E. & Yao, Zheng, 2015. "Wind power forecasting based on principle component phase space reconstruction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 737-744.
    16. Rongsheng Liu & Minfang Peng & Xianghui Xiao, 2018. "Ultra-Short-Term Wind Power Prediction Based on Multivariate Phase Space Reconstruction and Multivariate Linear Regression," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Gallego-Castillo, Cristobal & Bessa, Ricardo & Cavalcante, Laura & Lopez-Garcia, Oscar, 2016. "On-line quantile regression in the RKHS (Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space) for operational probabilistic forecasting of wind power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 355-365.
    18. Wang, Cong & Zhang, Hongli & Fan, Wenhui & Ma, Ping, 2017. "A new chaotic time series hybrid prediction method of wind power based on EEMD-SE and full-parameters continued fraction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 977-990.
    19. Kubik, M.L. & Coker, P.J. & Hunt, C., 2012. "The role of conventional generation in managing variability," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 253-261.
    20. de Guibert, Paul & Shirizadeh, Behrang & Quirion, Philippe, 2020. "Variable time-step: A method for improving computational tractability for energy system models with long-term storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:206:y:2017:i:c:p:439-450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.