IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v198y2017icp299-311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Desirability function for optimization of Dilute Acid pretreatment of sugarcane straw for ethanol production and preliminary economic analysis based in three fermentation configurations

Author

Listed:
  • Mesa, Leyanis
  • Martínez, Yenisleidy
  • Barrio, Edenny
  • González, Erenio

Abstract

Sugarcane straw is a lignocellulosic residue accumulated during the harvest of sugarcane and is a potential feedstock for second generation biofuel. This work covers the optimization of pretreatment step in the ethanol production using a complete factorial design (23), where the analyzed factors were temperature, acid concentration and time in the Dilute Acid pretreatment. Desirability function was applied in this stage to maximize sugar yields and minimize inhibitor concentrations, resulting in overall sugars yield ∼60% and furfural concentration of 0.5g/L. An enzymatic hydrolysis stage was done to increase sugar release. The fermentation stage was studied through three different configurations, such as Separate Hydrolysis and Fermentation (SHF), Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation (SSF) and Presaccharification and Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation (PSSF). The most promising alternative turned out to be PSSF due its higher ethanol concentration, with a value of 14.8g/100g dry weight (DW) biomass, equivalent to 187L/tonne DW using C6-sugars. The economic analysis revealed that the integration between enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation in the ethanol production affected the total capital cost. The cost of raw materials (sugarcane straw and enzymes) had the most significant impact on the total production cost and accounted between 35.66 and 25.88% of the total cost of the ethanol plant from sugarcane straw.

Suggested Citation

  • Mesa, Leyanis & Martínez, Yenisleidy & Barrio, Edenny & González, Erenio, 2017. "Desirability function for optimization of Dilute Acid pretreatment of sugarcane straw for ethanol production and preliminary economic analysis based in three fermentation configurations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 299-311.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:198:y:2017:i:c:p:299-311
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261917302362
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Castro, Eulogio & Nieves, Ismael U. & Mullinnix, Mike T. & Sagues, William J. & Hoffman, Ralph W. & Fernández-Sandoval, Marco T. & Tian, Zhuoli & Rockwood, Donald L. & Tamang, Bijay & Ingram, Lonnie O, 2014. "Optimization of dilute-phosphoric-acid steam pretreatment of Eucalyptus benthamii for biofuel production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 76-83.
    2. Chovau, Simon & Degrauwe, David & Van der Bruggen, Bart, 2013. "Critical analysis of techno-economic estimates for the production cost of lignocellulosic bio-ethanol," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 307-321.
    3. Haven, Mai Østergaard & Lindedam, Jane & Jeppesen, Martin Dan & Elleskov, Michael & Rodrigues, Ana Cristina & Gama, Miguel & Jørgensen, Henning & Felby, Claus, 2015. "Continuous recycling of enzymes during production of lignocellulosic bioethanol in demonstration scale," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 188-195.
    4. Banerji, Aditi & Balakrishnan, M. & Kishore, V.V.N., 2013. "Low severity dilute-acid hydrolysis of sweet sorghum bagasse," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 197-206.
    5. van Eijck, Janske & Batidzirai, Bothwell & Faaij, André, 2014. "Current and future economic performance of first and second generation biofuels in developing countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 115-141.
    6. Frankó, Balázs & Galbe, Mats & Wallberg, Ola, 2016. "Bioethanol production from forestry residues: A comparative techno-economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 727-736.
    7. Unrean, Pornkamol & Khajeeram, Sutamat, 2016. "Optimization and techno-economic assessment of high-solid fed-batch saccharification and ethanol fermentation by Scheffersomyces stipitis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae consortium," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1062-1072.
    8. Liu, Yunyun & Zhang, Yu & Xu, Jingliang & Sun, Yongming & Yuan, Zhenhong & Xie, Jun, 2015. "Consolidated bioprocess for bioethanol production with alkali-pretreated sugarcane bagasse," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 517-522.
    9. Sindhu, Raveendran & Kuttiraja, Mathiyazhakan & Binod, Parameswaran & Sukumaran, Rajeev Kumar & Pandey, Ashok, 2014. "Physicochemical characterization of alkali pretreated sugarcane tops and optimization of enzymatic saccharification using response surface methodology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 362-368.
    10. Mesa, Leyanis & López, Nancy & Cara, Cristóbal & Castro, Eulogio & González, Erenio & Mussatto, Solange I., 2016. "Techno-economic evaluation of strategies based on two steps organosolv pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse for ethanol production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 270-279.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mesa, Leyanis & Martínez, Yenisleidy & Celia de Armas, Ana & González, Erenio, 2020. "Ethanol production from sugarcane straw using different configurations of fermentation and techno-economical evaluation of the best schemes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 377-388.
    2. Cheng, F. & Brewer, C.E., 2021. "Conversion of protein-rich lignocellulosic wastes to bio-energy: Review and recommendations for hydrolysis + fermentation and anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    3. Islam, Md Khairul & Rehman, Shazia & Guan, Jianyu & Lau, Chun-Yin & Tse, Ho-Yin & Yeung, Chi Shun & Leu, Shao-Yuan, 2021. "Biphasic pretreatment for energy and carbon efficient conversion of lignocellulose into bioenergy and reactive lignin," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    4. Dong, Chengyu & Wang, Ying & Chan, Ka-Lai & Bhatia, Akanksha & Leu, Shao-Yuan, 2018. "Temperature profiling to maximize energy yield with reduced water input in a lignocellulosic ethanol biorefinery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 63-72.
    5. Wang, Pixiang & Chen, Yong Mei & Wang, Yifen & Lee, Yoon Y. & Zong, Wenming & Taylor, Steven & McDonald, Timothy & Wang, Yi, 2019. "Towards comprehensive lignocellulosic biomass utilization for bioenergy production: Efficient biobutanol production from acetic acid pretreated switchgrass with Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum ," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 551-559.
    6. Huang, Yingying & Chen, Xuechu & Liu, Silu & Lu, Jinzhong & Shen, Yingshi & Li, Lei & Peng, Lin & Hong, Jingjie & Zhang, Qiuzhuo & Ostrovsky, Ilia, 2021. "Converting of nuisance cyanobacterial biomass to feedstock for bioethanol production by regulation of intracellular carbon flow: Killing two birds with one stone," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    7. Ge, Yuntian & Li, Lin, 2018. "System-level energy consumption modeling and optimization for cellulosic biofuel production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 935-946.
    8. Vasconcelos, Marcelo Holanda & Mendes, Fernanda Machado & Ramos, Lucas & Dias, Marina Oliveira S. & Bonomi, Antonio & Jesus, Charles Dayan F. & Watanabe, Marcos Djun B. & Junqueira, Tassia Lopes & Mil, 2020. "Techno-economic assessment of bioenergy and biofuel production in integrated sugarcane biorefinery: Identification of technological bottlenecks and economic feasibility of dilute acid pretreatment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mesa, Leyanis & Martínez, Yenisleidy & Celia de Armas, Ana & González, Erenio, 2020. "Ethanol production from sugarcane straw using different configurations of fermentation and techno-economical evaluation of the best schemes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 377-388.
    2. Kuo, Yen-Ting & Chen, Ju-Shiou & Yang, Tzu-Yueh & Wan, Hou-Peng, 2018. "Technical and Economic approach of bioethanol production from nanofiltration of biomass chemical hydrolysis solutions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 426-436.
    3. Zhao, Xuebing & Liu, Dehua, 2019. "Multi-products co-production improves the economic feasibility of cellulosic ethanol: A case of Formiline pretreatment-based biorefining," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 229-244.
    4. Chen, Jiaxin & Zhang, Biying & Luo, Lingli & Zhang, Fan & Yi, Yanglei & Shan, Yuanyuan & Liu, Bianfang & Zhou, Yuan & Wang, Xin & Lü, Xin, 2021. "A review on recycling techniques for bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    5. Carrillo-Nieves, Danay & Rostro Alanís, Magdalena J. & de la Cruz Quiroz, Reynaldo & Ruiz, Héctor A. & Iqbal, Hafiz M.N. & Parra-Saldívar, Roberto, 2019. "Current status and future trends of bioethanol production from agro-industrial wastes in Mexico," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 63-74.
    6. Radhakumari, Muktham & Taha, Mohamed & Shahsavari, Esmaeil & Bhargava, Suresh K. & Satyavathi, Bankupalli & Ball, Andrew S., 2017. "Pongamia pinnata seed residue – A low cost inedible resource for on-site/in-house lignocellulases and sustainable ethanol production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 682-687.
    7. Taghizadeh-Alisaraei, Ahmad & Motevali, Ali & Ghobadian, Barat, 2019. "Ethanol production from date wastes: Adapted technologies, challenges, and global potential," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1094-1110.
    8. Mariana S. T. Amândio & Joana M. Pereira & Jorge M. S. Rocha & Luísa S. Serafim & Ana M. R. B. Xavier, 2022. "Getting Value from Pulp and Paper Industry Wastes: On the Way to Sustainability and Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-31, June.
    9. Graham von Maltitz, 2017. "Options for suitable biofuel farming: Experience from Southern Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-100, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Solarte-Toro, Juan Camilo & Romero-García, Juan Miguel & Martínez-Patiño, Juan Carlos & Ruiz-Ramos, Encarnación & Castro-Galiano, Eulogio & Cardona-Alzate, Carlos Ariel, 2019. "Acid pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for energy vectors production: A review focused on operational conditions and techno-economic assessment for bioethanol production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 587-601.
    11. Clauser, Nicolás M. & Felissia, Fernando E. & Area, María C. & Vallejos, María E., 2021. "A framework for the design and analysis of integrated multi-product biorefineries from agricultural and forestry wastes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    12. Bechara, Rami & Gomez, Adrien & Saint-Antonin, Valérie & Schweitzer, Jean-Marc & Maréchal, François & Ensinas, Adriano, 2018. "Review of design works for the conversion of sugarcane to first and second-generation ethanol and electricity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 152-164.
    13. Chen, Hongzhang & Fu, Xiaoguo, 2016. "Industrial technologies for bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 468-478.
    14. Vaz, Fernanda Leitão & da Rocha Lins, Jennyfer & Alves Alencar, Bárbara Ribeiro & Silva de Abreu, Íthalo Barbosa & Vidal, Esteban Espinosa & Ribeiro, Ester & Valadares de Sá Barretto Sampaio, Everardo, 2021. "Chemical pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse with liquid fraction recycling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 666-673.
    15. Singh, Shuchi & Khanna, Swati & Moholkar, Vijayanand S. & Goyal, Arun, 2014. "Screening and optimization of pretreatments for Parthenium hysterophorus as feedstock for alcoholic biofuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 195-206.
    16. Costa, Fabrício Rodrigues & Ribeiro, Carlos Antonio Alvares Soares & Marcatti, Gustavo Eduardo & Lorenzon, Alexandre Simões & Teixeira, Thaisa Ribeiro & Domingues, Getulio Fonseca & Castro, Nero Lemos, 2020. "GIS applied to location of bioenergy plants in tropical agricultural areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 911-918.
    17. Graham von Maltitz, 2017. "Options for suitable biofuel farming: Experience from Southern Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series 100, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    18. Santos, Catarina I. & Silva, Constança C. & Mussatto, Solange I. & Osseweijer, Patricia & van der Wielen, Luuk A.M. & Posada, John A., 2018. "Integrated 1st and 2nd generation sugarcane bio-refinery for jet fuel production in Brazil: Techno-economic and greenhouse gas emissions assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 733-747.
    19. Pandey, Ajay Kumar & Edgard, Gnansounou & Negi, Sangeeta, 2016. "Optimization of concomitant production of cellulase and xylanase from Rhizopus oryzae SN5 through EVOP-factorial design technique and application in Sorghum Stover based bioethanol production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 51-56.
    20. Hyun Jin Jung & Hyun Kwak & Jinyoung Chun & Kyeong Keun Oh, 2021. "Alkaline Fractionation and Subsequent Production of Nano-Structured Silica and Cellulose Nano-Fibrils for the Comprehensive Utilization of Rice Husk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:198:y:2017:i:c:p:299-311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.