IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v157y2015icp245-254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Photofermentive hydrogen production by Rhodobacter sphaeroides S10 using mixed organic carbon: Effects of the mixture composition

Author

Listed:
  • Pattanamanee, Walailak
  • Chisti, Yusuf
  • Choorit, Wanna

Abstract

Thermal and acid hydrolysates of oil palm empty fruit bunch and other lignocellulosic substrates contain glucose, xylose, and acetic acid as the main components. In using such hydrolysates for photofermentive production of biohydrogen, the gas yield is highly dependent on the composition of the mixed carbon substrate. Batch photofermentation experiments were used to investigate the effect of the composition of the mixed carbon (glucose G, xylose X, and acetic acid A) on growth and hydrogen production by the bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides S10. Anaerobic fermentations were carried out at 35°C under an incident light level of 14.6W/m2. The mixed carbon composition strongly influenced hydrogen and biomass production. Depending on the composition of the mixed substrate: the cumulative hydrogen volume ranged from 0.99 to 2.33L H2/L medium; the conversion efficiency ranged from 21% to 45%; and the biomass yield on substrate ranged from 0.28 to 0.47g DCW/g (G+X+A). Based on the conversion efficiency, the optimal substrate for hydrogen production was a mixture of 5mM glucose, 18mM xylose and 7mM acetic acid. This combination gave a cumulative hydrogen volume of 2.33L H2/L medium. The hydrogen yield was 3.56mol H2/mol mixed substrate and the substrate specific hydrogen production rate was 7.26mL H2/g mixed substrate h. The conversion efficiency and the lag period of hydrogen production were 45% and 13h, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Pattanamanee, Walailak & Chisti, Yusuf & Choorit, Wanna, 2015. "Photofermentive hydrogen production by Rhodobacter sphaeroides S10 using mixed organic carbon: Effects of the mixture composition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 245-254.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:157:y:2015:i:c:p:245-254
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261915009538
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rashid, Naim & Rehman, Muhammad Saif Ur & Memon, Sheeraz & Ur Rahman, Zia & Lee, Kisay & Han, Jong-In, 2013. "Current status, barriers and developments in biohydrogen production by microalgae," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 571-579.
    2. Kumar, G. & Bakonyi, P. & Periyasamy, S. & Kim, S.H. & Nemestóthy, N. & Bélafi-Bakó, K., 2015. "Lignocellulose biohydrogen: Practical challenges and recent progress," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 728-737.
    3. Wu, Ta Yeong & Hay, Jacqueline Xiao Wen & Kong, Liu Bi & Juan, Joon Ching & Jahim, Jamaliah Md., 2012. "Recent advances in reuse of waste material as substrate to produce biohydrogen by purple non-sulfur (PNS) bacteria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3117-3122.
    4. Azwar, M.Y. & Hussain, M.A. & Abdul-Wahab, A.K., 2014. "Development of biohydrogen production by photobiological, fermentation and electrochemical processes: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 158-173.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Trchounian, Karen & Sawers, R. Gary & Trchounian, Armen, 2017. "Improving biohydrogen productivity by microbial dark- and photo-fermentations: Novel data and future approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1201-1216.
    2. Majidian, Parastoo & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Zeinolabedini, Mehrshad & Naghshbandi, Mohammad Pooya & Chisti, Yusuf, 2018. "Metabolic engineering of microorganisms for biofuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3863-3885.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bakonyi, Péter & Buitrón, Germán & Valdez-Vazquez, Idania & Nemestóthy, Nándor & Bélafi-Bakó, Katalin, 2017. "A novel gas separation integrated membrane bioreactor to evaluate the impact of self-generated biogas recycling on continuous hydrogen fermentation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 813-823.
    2. Shi, Xian-Yang & Yu, Han-Qing, 2016. "Simultaneous metabolism of benzoate and photobiological hydrogen production by Lyngbya sp," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 474-477.
    3. Ferraren-De Cagalitan, D.D.T. & Abundo, M.L.S., 2021. "A review of biohydrogen production technology for application towards hydrogen fuel cells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    4. Trchounian, Karen & Sawers, R. Gary & Trchounian, Armen, 2017. "Improving biohydrogen productivity by microbial dark- and photo-fermentations: Novel data and future approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1201-1216.
    5. Yang, Guang & Wang, Jianlong, 2018. "Various additives for improving dark fermentative hydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 130-146.
    6. Khan, Mohd Atiqueuzzaman & Ngo, Huu Hao & Guo, Wenshan & Liu, Yiwen & Zhang, Xinbo & Guo, Jianbo & Chang, Soon Woong & Nguyen, Dinh Duc & Wang, Jie, 2018. "Biohydrogen production from anaerobic digestion and its potential as renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 754-768.
    7. Łukajtis, Rafał & Hołowacz, Iwona & Kucharska, Karolina & Glinka, Marta & Rybarczyk, Piotr & Przyjazny, Andrzej & Kamiński, Marian, 2018. "Hydrogen production from biomass using dark fermentation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 665-694.
    8. María Pilar González-Vázquez & Roberto García & Covadonga Pevida & Fernando Rubiera, 2017. "Optimization of a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Plant for Low-Temperature Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Kumar, Gopal Ramesh & Chowdhary, Nupoor, 2016. "Biotechnological and bioinformatics approaches for augmentation of biohydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1194-1206.
    10. Trad, Zaineb & Fontaine, Jean-Pierre & Larroche, Christian & Vial, Christophe, 2016. "Multiscale mixing analysis and modeling of biohydrogen production by dark fermentation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 264-282.
    11. Haorui Zhang & Jiaolin Li & Quanguo Zhang & Shengnan Zhu & Shuai Yang & Zhiping Zhang, 2020. "Effect of Substrate Concentration on Photo-Fermentation Bio-Hydrogen Production Process from Starch-Rich Agricultural Leftovers under Oscillation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-8, March.
    12. Ndayisenga, Fabrice & Yu, Zhisheng & Zheng, Jianzhong & Wang, Bobo & Liang, Hongxia & Phulpoto, Irfan Ali & Habiyakare, Telesphore & Zhou, Dandan, 2021. "Microbial electrohydrogenesis cell and dark fermentation integrated system enhances biohydrogen production from lignocellulosic agricultural wastes: Substrate pretreatment towards optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    13. Kadier, Abudukeremu & Kalil, Mohd Sahaid & Abdeshahian, Peyman & Chandrasekhar, K. & Mohamed, Azah & Azman, Nadia Farhana & Logroño, Washington & Simayi, Yibadatihan & Hamid, Aidil Abdul, 2016. "Recent advances and emerging challenges in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) for microbial production of hydrogen and value-added chemicals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 501-525.
    14. Lin, Chiu-Yue & Nguyen, Thi Mai-Linh & Chu, Chen-Yeon & Leu, Hoang-Jyh & Lay, Chyi-How, 2018. "Fermentative biohydrogen production and its byproducts: A mini review of current technology developments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 4215-4220.
    15. Miyawaki, B. & Mariano, A.B. & Vargas, J.V.C. & Balmant, W. & Defrancheschi, A.C. & Corrêa, D.O. & Santos, B. & Selesu, N.F.H. & Ordonez, J.C. & Kava, V.M., 2021. "Microalgae derived biomass and bioenergy production enhancement through biogas purification and wastewater treatment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1153-1165.
    16. He, Li & Du, Peng & Chen, Yizhong & Lu, Hongwei & Cheng, Xi & Chang, Bei & Wang, Zheng, 2017. "Advances in microbial fuel cells for wastewater treatment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 388-403.
    17. Palomo-Briones, Rodolfo & Razo-Flores, Elías & Bernet, Nicolas & Trably, Eric, 2017. "Dark-fermentative biohydrogen pathways and microbial networks in continuous stirred tank reactors: Novel insights on their control," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 77-87.
    18. Anita Šalić & Bruno Zelić, 2022. "A Game Changer: Microfluidic Technology for Enhancing Biohydrogen Production—Small Size for Great Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.
    19. Soares, Juliana Ferreira & Confortin, Tássia Carla & Todero, Izelmar & Mayer, Flávio Dias & Mazutti, Marcio Antonio, 2020. "Dark fermentative biohydrogen production from lignocellulosic biomass: Technological challenges and future prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    20. Sołowski, Gaweł & Shalaby, Marwa.S. & Abdallah, Heba & Shaban, Ahmed.M. & Cenian, Adam, 2018. "Production of hydrogen from biomass and its separation using membrane technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3152-3167.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:157:y:2015:i:c:p:245-254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.