IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v135y2014icp539-547.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A 3D CFD model for predicting the temperature distribution in a full scale APU SOFC short stack under transient operating conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Al-Masri, A.
  • Peksen, M.
  • Blum, L.
  • Stolten, D.

Abstract

During the development process of solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) for Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) applications heat-up experiments are performed with hot gases. The inlet temperatures and the mass flow rates of the hot gases are adjusted experimentally to avoid high local thermal gradients and prevent high stresses in the stack components. In order to reduce the experimental effort needed to achieve this goal the modeling approach is utilized. For this purpose a 3D computational model is created for predicting the temperature field in a lightweight SOFC stack based on Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis. The model is focused on SOFCs for APU applications and was utilized in the simulation of the transient heating-up process of a full multi-layer short SOFC stack. The resulting temperature field was analyzed and the computed outlet temperatures of the heating gases at different time instants were compared to experimental data and show good agreement, which validates the numerical model used in the analysis. The simulation results indicate that the maximum temperatures and temperature gradients in the solid body appear in the vicinity of the inlet regions. Also at the end of the heating-up process higher temperature gradients appear in the outlet area as a result of the increased mass flow rates of the hot gases. The created CFD model provides a powerful simulation tool for predicting the 3D temperature field in the fuel cell stack.

Suggested Citation

  • Al-Masri, A. & Peksen, M. & Blum, L. & Stolten, D., 2014. "A 3D CFD model for predicting the temperature distribution in a full scale APU SOFC short stack under transient operating conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 539-547.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:135:y:2014:i:c:p:539-547
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261914008630
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Razbani, Omid & Wærnhus, Ivar & Assadi, Mohsen, 2013. "Experimental investigation of temperature distribution over a planar solid oxide fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 155-160.
    2. Wang, Yun & Chen, Ken S. & Mishler, Jeffrey & Cho, Sung Chan & Adroher, Xavier Cordobes, 2011. "A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: Technology, applications, and needs on fundamental research," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 981-1007, April.
    3. Eveloy, Valérie, 2012. "Numerical analysis of an internal methane reforming solid oxide fuel cell with fuel recycling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 107-115.
    4. Andersson, Martin & Yuan, Jinliang & Sundén, Bengt, 2010. "Review on modeling development for multiscale chemical reactions coupled transport phenomena in solid oxide fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(5), pages 1461-1476, May.
    5. Chen, Daifen & Zeng, Qice & Su, Shichuan & Bi, Wuxi & Ren, Zhiqiang, 2013. "Geometric optimization of a 10-cell modular planar solid oxide fuel cell stack manifold," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1100-1107.
    6. Yuan, Wei & Tang, Yong & Yang, Xiaojun & Wan, Zhenping, 2012. "Porous metal materials for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells – A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 309-329.
    7. Calise, F. & Ferruzzi, G. & Vanoli, L., 2009. "Parametric exergy analysis of a tubular Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) stack through finite-volume model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(11), pages 2401-2410, November.
    8. Yan, Min & Zeng, Min & Chen, Qiuyang & Wang, Qiuwang, 2012. "Numerical study on carbon deposition of SOFC with unsteady state variation of porosity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 754-762.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Königshofer, Benjamin & Boškoski, Pavle & Nusev, Gjorgji & Koroschetz, Markus & Hochfellner, Martin & Schwaiger, Marcel & Juričić, Đani & Hochenauer, Christoph & Subotić, Vanja, 2021. "Performance assessment and evaluation of SOC stacks designed for application in a reversible operated 150 kW rSOC power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    2. Shi, Wangying & Zhu, Jianzhong & Han, Minfang & Sun, Zaihong & Guo, Yaming, 2019. "Operating limitation and degradation modeling of micro solid oxide fuel cell-combined heat and power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Kishimoto, Masashi & Kishida, Shohei & Seo, Haewon & Iwai, Hiroshi & Yoshida, Hideo, 2021. "Prediction of electrochemical characteristics of practical-size solid oxide fuel cells based on database of unit cell performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    4. Wehrle, Lukas & Schmider, Daniel & Dailly, Julian & Banerjee, Aayan & Deutschmann, Olaf, 2022. "Benchmarking solid oxide electrolysis cell-stacks for industrial Power-to-Methane systems via hierarchical multi-scale modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    5. Murat Peksen, 2021. "Hydrogen Technology towards the Solution of Environment-Friendly New Energy Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-6, August.
    6. Marocco, Paolo & Ferrero, Domenico & Lanzini, Andrea & Santarelli, Massimo, 2019. "Benefits from heat pipe integration in H2/H2O fed SOFC systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 472-482.
    7. Guk, Erdogan & Kim, Jung-Sik & Ranaweera, Manoj & Venkatesan, Vijay & Jackson, Lisa, 2018. "In-situ monitoring of temperature distribution in operating solid oxide fuel cell cathode using proprietary sensory techniques versus commercial thermocouples," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 551-562.
    8. Zaccaria, V. & Tucker, D. & Traverso, A., 2017. "Operating strategies to minimize degradation in fuel cell gas turbine hybrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 437-445.
    9. Wang, Chaoyang & Chen, Ming & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie, 2020. "Dynamic modeling and parameter analysis study on reversible solid oxide cells during mode switching transient processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    10. Zeng, Hongyu & Wang, Yuqing & Shi, Yixiang & Cai, Ningsheng & Yuan, Dazhong, 2018. "Highly thermal integrated heat pipe-solid oxide fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 613-619.
    11. Guk, Erdogan & Venkatesan, Vijay & Babar, Shumaila & Jackson, Lisa & Kim, Jung-Sik, 2019. "Parameters and their impacts on the temperature distribution and thermal gradient of solid oxide fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 164-173.
    12. Ashraf, Muhammad Adeel & Rashid, Kashif & Rahimipetroudi, Iman & Kim, Hyeon Jin & Dong, Sang Keun, 2020. "Analyzing different planar biogas-fueled SOFC stack designs and their effects on the flow uniformity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    13. Kupecki, Jakub & Motylinski, Konrad & Milewski, Jaroslaw, 2018. "Dynamic analysis of direct internal reforming in a SOFC stack with electrolyte-supported cells using a quasi-1D model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 198-205.
    14. Garg, Akhil & Vijayaraghavan, Venkatesh & Zhang, Jian & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2017. "Robust model design for evaluation of power characteristics of the cleaner energy system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 302-313.
    15. Preininger, Michael & Stoeckl, Bernhard & Subotić, Vanja & Mittmann, Frank & Hochenauer, Christoph, 2019. "Performance of a ten-layer reversible Solid Oxide Cell stack (rSOC) under transient operation for autonomous application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    16. Zaccaria, V. & Tucker, D. & Traverso, A., 2016. "Transfer function development for SOFC/GT hybrid systems control using cold air bypass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 695-706.
    17. Li, Ang & Song, Ce & Lin, Zijing, 2017. "A multiphysics fully coupled modeling tool for the design and operation analysis of planar solid oxide fuel cell stacks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1234-1244.
    18. Badur, Janusz & Lemański, Marcin & Kowalczyk, Tomasz & Ziółkowski, Paweł & Kornet, Sebastian, 2018. "Zero-dimensional robust model of an SOFC with internal reforming for hybrid energy cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 128-138.
    19. Shao, Qian & Gao, Enlai & Mara, Thierry & Hu, Heng & Liu, Tong & Makradi, Ahmed, 2020. "Global sensitivity analysis of solid oxide fuel cells with Bayesian sparse polynomial chaos expansions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    20. Frank, Matthias & Deja, Robert & Peters, Roland & Blum, Ludger & Stolten, Detlef, 2018. "Bypassing renewable variability with a reversible solid oxide cell plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 101-112.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Daifen & Zeng, Qice & Su, Shichuan & Bi, Wuxi & Ren, Zhiqiang, 2013. "Geometric optimization of a 10-cell modular planar solid oxide fuel cell stack manifold," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1100-1107.
    2. He, Zhongjie & Li, Hua & Birgersson, E., 2014. "Correlating variability of modeling parameters with non-isothermal stack performance: Monte Carlo simulation of a portable 3D planar solid oxide fuel cell stack," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 560-575.
    3. Sorce, A. & Greco, A. & Magistri, L. & Costamagna, P., 2014. "FDI oriented modeling of an experimental SOFC system, model validation and simulation of faulty states," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 894-908.
    4. Wang, Junye, 2015. "Theory and practice of flow field designs for fuel cell scaling-up: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 640-663.
    5. Wang, Baoxuan & Zhu, Jiang & Lin, Zijing, 2016. "A theoretical framework for multiphysics modeling of methane fueled solid oxide fuel cell and analysis of low steam methane reforming kinetics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 1-11.
    6. Komatsu, Y. & Brus, G. & Kimijima, S. & Szmyd, J.S., 2014. "The effect of overpotentials on the transient response of the 300W SOFC cell stack voltage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 352-359.
    7. Oh, Song-yul & Kikuchi, Takuya & Kawamura, Go & Muto, Hiroyuki & Matsuda, Atsunori, 2013. "Proton conductive composite electrolytes in the KH2PO4–H3PW12O40 system for H2/O2 fuel cell operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1108-1114.
    8. Pavelka, Michal & Klika, Václav & Vágner, Petr & Maršík, František, 2015. "Generalization of exergy analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 158-172.
    9. Bae, Suk Joo & Kim, Seong-Joon & Lee, Jin-Hwa & Song, Inseob & Kim, Nam-In & Seo, Yongho & Kim, Ki Buem & Lee, Naesung & Park, Jun-Young, 2014. "Degradation pattern prediction of a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell stack with series reliability structure via durability data of single cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 48-55.
    10. Fardadi, Mahshid & McLarty, Dustin F. & Jabbari, Faryar, 2016. "Investigation of thermal control for different SOFC flow geometries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 43-55.
    11. Bao, Zhiming & Niu, Zhiqiang & Jiao, Kui, 2020. "Gas distribution and droplet removal of metal foam flow field for proton exchange membrane fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    12. Jiao, Kui & Bachman, John & Zhou, Yibo & Park, Jae Wan, 2014. "Effect of induced cross flow on flow pattern and performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 75-82.
    13. Razbani, Omid & Wærnhus, Ivar & Assadi, Mohsen, 2013. "Experimental investigation of temperature distribution over a planar solid oxide fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 155-160.
    14. Silva-Mosqueda, Dulce María & Elizalde-Blancas, Francisco & Pumiglia, Davide & Santoni, Francesca & Boigues-Muñoz, Carlos & McPhail, Stephen J., 2019. "Intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cell under internal reforming: Critical operating conditions, associated problems and their impact on the performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 625-640.
    15. Awin, Yussef & Dukhan, Nihad, 2019. "Experimental performance assessment of metal-foam flow fields for proton exchange membrane fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Hou, Yuze & Deng, Hao & Pan, Fengwen & Chen, Wenmiao & Du, Qing & Jiao, Kui, 2019. "Pore-scale investigation of catalyst layer ingredient and structure effect in proton exchange membrane fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Huo, Sen & Cooper, Nathanial James & Smith, Travis Lee & Park, Jae Wan & Jiao, Kui, 2017. "Experimental investigation on PEM fuel cell cold start behavior containing porous metal foam as cathode flow distributor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 101-114.
    18. Wu, Horng-Wen, 2016. "A review of recent development: Transport and performance modeling of PEM fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 81-106.
    19. Guk, Erdogan & Ranaweera, Manoj & Venkatesan, Vijay & Kim, Jung-Sik & Jung, WooChul, 2020. "In-situ temperature monitoring directly from cathode surface of an operating solid oxide fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    20. Min Yan & Pei Fu & Qiuyang Chen & Qiuwang Wang & Min Zeng & Jaideep Pandit, 2014. "Electrical Performance and Carbon Deposition Differences between the Bi-Layer Interconnector and Conventional Straight Interconnector Solid Oxide Fuel Cell," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-13, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:135:y:2014:i:c:p:539-547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.