IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v113y2014icp1171-1187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combined gas and electricity network expansion planning

Author

Listed:
  • Chaudry, Modassar
  • Jenkins, Nick
  • Qadrdan, Meysam
  • Wu, Jianzhong

Abstract

A combined gas and electricity network expansion planning model was developed. Gas-fired generation plants were considered as linkages between the two networks. The model simultaneously minimises gas and electricity operational and network expansion costs. Additionally it optimally places planned power generation plants around the electricity network. Network expansion was implemented by adding new assets such as pipes, compressors, and storage facilities in the gas network and increasing transmission line capacity in the electricity network. The developed model was used to analyse the GB gas and electricity infrastructure expansion requirements to achieve a low carbon energy system. Two scenarios were implemented, a reference and a low carbon scenario. For both scenarios, CGEN defined a network at lowest cost capable of meeting varying demand and power generation capacity profiles. Greater peak gas demand of approximately 25mcm/d by 2030 in the reference scenario resulted in CGEN adding an additional 1Bcm of gas storage capacity compared with the low carbon scenario. LNG gas supplies were shown to account for over 70% of total gas supplies by the end of the time horizon for both scenarios. The combined gas and electricity network planning approach allows analysis into the interactions between these two networks. This interaction allows variables such as total gas supply (gas used for electricity production is an endogenous variable), which 13% higher in the reference scenario and geographic location of gas fired generation to explicitly take account of the impact on both gas and electricity infrastructures.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaudry, Modassar & Jenkins, Nick & Qadrdan, Meysam & Wu, Jianzhong, 2014. "Combined gas and electricity network expansion planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1171-1187.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:113:y:2014:i:c:p:1171-1187
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261913007150
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.071?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andre, Jean & Bonnans, Frédéric & Cornibert, Laurent, 2009. "Optimization of capacity expansion planning for gas transportation networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(3), pages 1019-1027, September.
    2. Qadrdan, Meysam & Chaudry, Modassar & Wu, Jianzhong & Jenkins, Nick & Ekanayake, Janaka, 2010. "Impact of a large penetration of wind generation on the GB gas network," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 5684-5695, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yongli & Wang, Yudong & Huang, Yujing & Yang, Jiale & Ma, Yuze & Yu, Haiyang & Zeng, Ming & Zhang, Fuwei & Zhang, Yanfu, 2019. "Operation optimization of regional integrated energy system based on the modeling of electricity-thermal-natural gas network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Chi, Lixun & Su, Huai & Zio, Enrico & Zhang, Jinjun & Li, Xueyi & Zhang, Li & Fan, Lin & Zhou, Jing & Bai, Hua, 2020. "Integrated Deterministic and Probabilistic Safety Analysis of Integrated Energy Systems with bi-directional conversion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    3. repec:cty:dpaper:10.1080/0013791x.2011.573615 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Pellegrino, Sandro & Lanzini, Andrea & Leone, Pierluigi, 2017. "Greening the gas network – The need for modelling the distributed injection of alternative fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 266-286.
    5. Mengying Xue & Tianhu Deng & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2019. "Optimizing natural gas pipeline transmission with nonuniform elevation: A new initialization approach," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(7), pages 547-564, October.
    6. Massol, O., 2011. "A cost function for the natural gas transmission industry: further considerations," Working Papers 1464, Department of Economics, City University London.
    7. Foley, A.M. & Ó Gallachóir, B.P. & McKeogh, E.J. & Milborrow, D. & Leahy, P.G., 2013. "Addressing the technical and market challenges to high wind power integration in Ireland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 692-703.
    8. Jin, Xiaolong & Mu, Yunfei & Jia, Hongjie & Wu, Jianzhong & Xu, Xiandong & Yu, Xiaodan, 2016. "Optimal day-ahead scheduling of integrated urban energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 1-13.
    9. Keyaerts, Nico & Delarue, Erik & Rombauts, Yannick & D’haeseleer, William, 2014. "Impact of unpredictable renewables on gas-balancing design in Europe," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 266-277.
    10. Conrado Borraz-Sánchez & Russell Bent & Scott Backhaus & Hassan Hijazi & Pascal Van Hentenryck, 2016. "Convex Relaxations for Gas Expansion Planning," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 645-656, November.
    11. Qadrdan, Meysam & Cheng, Meng & Wu, Jianzhong & Jenkins, Nick, 2017. "Benefits of demand-side response in combined gas and electricity networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 360-369.
    12. Frédéric Babonneau & Yurii Nesterov & Jean-Philippe Vial, 2012. "Design and Operations of Gas Transmission Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(1), pages 34-47, February.
    13. Yiyong Xiao & Abdullah Konak, 2017. "A variable neighborhood search for the network design problem with relays," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 137-164, June.
    14. Flora, Rui & Marques, António Cardoso & Fuinhas, José Alberto, 2014. "Wind power idle capacity in a panel of European countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 823-830.
    15. Song, Shuang & Govindan, Kannan & Xu, Lei & Du, Peng & Qiao, Xiaojiao, 2017. "Capacity and production planning with carbon emission constraints," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 132-150.
    16. Yanbo Chen & Yangzi Wang & Jin Ma, 2018. "Multi-Objective Optimal Energy Management for the Integrated Electrical and Natural Gas Network with Combined Cooling, Heat and Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, March.
    17. Ralf Lenz & Kai Helge Becker, 2022. "Optimization of capacity expansion in potential-driven networks including multiple looping: a comparison of modelling approaches," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(1), pages 179-224, March.
    18. Qadrdan, Meysam & Ameli, Hossein & Strbac, Goran & Jenkins, Nicholas, 2017. "Efficacy of options to address balancing challenges: Integrated gas and electricity perspectives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 181-190.
    19. Skea, Jim & Chaudry, Modassar & Wang, Xinxin, 2012. "The role of gas infrastructure in promoting UK energy security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 202-213.
    20. Ameli, Hossein & Qadrdan, Meysam & Strbac, Goran, 2017. "Value of gas network infrastructure flexibility in supporting cost effective operation of power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 571-580.
    21. Andrea Antenucci & Giovanni Sansavini, 2018. "Adequacy and security analysis of interdependent electric and gas networks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(2), pages 121-139, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:113:y:2014:i:c:p:1171-1187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.