IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ3/2022-01-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Smart Home Systems in the Context of the Internet of Things in Terms of Consumer Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Serap Turkyilmaz

    (Beykent University, Istanbul, Turkey.)

  • Erkut Altindað

    (Beykent University, Istanbul, Turkey.)

Abstract

Smart homes, which are an important component of the Internet of Things (IoT) provides an effective service for users by communicating with various digital devices based on IoT. IoT-based smart home technology has transformed the lives of humans by providing everyone with a connection independently from time and space. However, due to various challenges such as privacy, security, and price, problems are experienced by consumers in terms of accepting smart home technologies. In the study, it was aimed to develop a model for accepting smart home technologies, and based on the results obtained, it was attempted to determine what factors affect the consumers’ intention to buy smart home systems. In this context, with the help of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), a research model was designed for the purchaser of a home as a product. In the research model, it was investigated what kind of effects perceived psychological factors (perceived ease of use, perceived intelligence, perceived suitability, perceived price, and perceived risk of privacy) have on the purpose and behavior of using IoT systems through perceived benefit. In addition, the relationship between sensory and emotional experiences of consumers, psychological perception factors and perceived usefulness was tested. Data was collected by conducting an online survey questionnaire completed by 430 respondents. Partial least squares (PLSs) was explored to test the theoretical model. The research results show that perceived psychological factors (perceived ease of use, perceived connectivity, perceived intelligence, perceived convenience, and perceived privacy risk) have significant effect on the intention and behavior of IOT systems usage through perceived benefit. In terms of sensory and emotional experience, it only softens the relationship between the perceived privacy risk of emotional experience and the perceived benefit.

Suggested Citation

  • Serap Turkyilmaz & Erkut Altindað, 2022. "Analysis of Smart Home Systems in the Context of the Internet of Things in Terms of Consumer Experience," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 12(1), pages 19-31.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ3:2022-01-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/download/12709/pdf/29552
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/view/12709/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Davidsson & Banafsheh Hajinasab & Johan Holmgren & Åse Jevinger & Jan A. Persson, 2016. "The Fourth Wave of Digitalization and Public Transport: Opportunities and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Davit Marikyan & Savvas Papagiannidis & Eleftherios Alamanos, 2021. "“Smart Home Sweet Smart Home”: An Examination of Smart Home Acceptance," International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), IGI Global, vol. 17(2), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Wei Gu & Peng Bao & Wenyuan Hao & Jaewoong Kim, 2019. "Empirical Examination of Intention to Continue to Use Smart Home Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Gentile, Chiara & Spiller, Nicola & Noci, Giuliano, 2007. "How to Sustain the Customer Experience:: An Overview of Experience Components that Co-create Value With the Customer," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 395-410, October.
    5. Arnould, Eric J & Price, Linda L, 1993. "River Magic: Extraordinary Experience and the Extended Service Encounter," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(1), pages 24-45, June.
    6. Marikyan, Davit & Papagiannidis, Savvas & Alamanos, Eleftherios, 2019. "A systematic review of the smart home literature: A user perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 139-154.
    7. Verhoef, Peter C. & Lemon, Katherine N. & Parasuraman, A. & Roggeveen, Anne & Tsiros, Michael & Schlesinger, Leonard A., 2009. "Customer Experience Creation: Determinants, Dynamics and Management Strategies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 31-41.
    8. Hong, Areum & Nam, Changi & Kim, Seongcheol, 2017. "Analysis of the barriers that consumers encounter when smart home service is introduced in South Korea," 14th ITS Asia-Pacific Regional Conference, Kyoto 2017: Mapping ICT into Transformation for the Next Information Society 168486, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    9. John Naughton, 2016. "The evolution of the Internet: from military experiment to General Purpose Technology," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 5-28, January.
    10. Emilia Ingemarsdotter & Ella Jamsin & Gerd Kortuem & Ruud Balkenende, 2019. "Circular Strategies Enabled by the Internet of Things—A Framework and Analysis of Current Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-37, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Söderlund, Magnus & Sagfossen, Sofie, 2017. "The consumer experience: The impact of supplier effort and consumer effort on customer satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 219-229.
    2. Barnes, Stuart J. & Mattsson, Jan & Sørensen, Flemming, 2014. "Destination brand experience and visitor behavior: Testing a scale in the tourism context," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 121-139.
    3. Sørensen, Flemming & Jensen, Jens Friis, 2015. "Value creation and knowledge development in tourism experience encounters," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 336-346.
    4. Carreira, Rui & Patrício, Lia & Natal Jorge, Renato & Magee, Chris & Van Eikema Hommes, Qi, 2013. "Towards a holistic approach to the travel experience: A qualitative study of bus transportation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 233-243.
    5. Manthiou, Aikaterini & Klaus, Phil, 2022. "The interplaying factors of the robotic tourism experience: The customer journey's touchpoints, context, and qualities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    6. Kacprzak, Agnieszka & Dziewanowska, Katarzyna, 2019. "Investigating the influence of consumer socio-demographic characteristics on the preferred type of consumption experience," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 24(4), pages 513-544.
    7. Christian Homburg & Danijel Jozić & Christina Kuehnl, 2017. "Customer experience management: toward implementing an evolving marketing concept," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 377-401, May.
    8. Michaud Trevinal, Aurélia & Stenger, Thomas, 2014. "Toward a conceptualization of the online shopping experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 314-326.
    9. Fernandes, Teresa & Cruz, Mariana, 2016. "Dimensions and outcomes of experience quality in tourism: The case of Port wine cellars," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 371-379.
    10. Savvas Papagiannidis & Dinara Davlembayeva, 2022. "Bringing Smart Home Technology to Peer-to-Peer Accommodation: Exploring the Drivers of Intention to Stay in Smart Accommodation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1189-1208, August.
    11. Lamin B. Ceesay, 2020. "Building a High Customer Experience Management Organization: Toward Customer-Centricity," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 9(2), pages 162-175, December.
    12. Zha, Dongmei & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea, 2023. "Synthesizing the customer experience concept: A multimodularity approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    13. Bruhn, Manfred & Mayer-Vorfelder, Matthias, 2011. "Kundenerfahrung als Forschungsgegenstand im Marketing - Konzeptionalisierung, Operationalisierung und empirische Befunde," Working papers 2011/01, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    14. Nwankwo Cosmas Anayochukwu & Kanyangale MacDonald Isaac, 2023. "Customer Experience Management: Analysis of Customer Retention in Restaurants in Anambra State, Nigeria," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 49(3), pages 1-26, September.
    15. Aurélia Michaud-Trévinal & Thomas Stenger, 2014. "Toward a conceptualization of the online shopping experience," Post-Print hal-01743643, HAL.
    16. Cátia Mendes Jesus & Helena Maria Batista Alves, 2019. "Consumer experience and the valued elements in the three phases of purchase of a cultural event," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 16(2), pages 173-194, December.
    17. Hugo Martins & Paulo Carvalho & Nuno Almeida, 2021. "Destination Brand Experience: A Study Case in Touristic Context of the Peneda-Gerês National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    18. Paul MUKUCHA & Divaries Cosmas JARAVAZA & Forbes MAKUDZA, 2022. "Towards Gender-Based Market Segmentation: The Differential Influence of Gender on Dining Experiences in the University Cafeteria Industry," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(2), pages 182-200, June.
    19. Gasparin, Isadora & Panina, Ekaterina & Becker, Larissa & Yrjölä, Mika & Jaakkola, Elina & Pizzutti, Cristiane, 2022. "Challenging the "integration imperative": A customer perspective on omnichannel journeys," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    20. Rouxelle de Villiers, 2017. "Experiences that Make Consumers Think: Cognitive Experiences," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 16(2), pages 177-179, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Consumer Survey; Internet of Things; Technology Acceptance; Information and Communication Technology; Consumer Experience;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ3:2022-01-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.