IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/2020-02-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy Security and Sustainability in Eurasian Economic Union in the Terms of Economic Growth: The Case of Kazakhstan s Energy Sector up to 2040 Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Galiya Movkebayeva

    (Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazaksthan,)

  • Aliya Aktymbayeva

    (Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazaksthan,)

  • Yuliya Tyurina

    (Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia,)

  • Nurken Baikadamov

    (Z. Aldamzhar Kostanay Social-Technical University, Kostanay, Kazaksthan,)

  • Kamar Beketova

    (Korkyt Ata Kyzylorda State University, Kazaksthan,)

  • Marija Troyanskaya

    (Orenburg State University, Russia,)

  • Sholpan Smagulova

    (Narxoz University, Almaty, Kazaksthan,)

  • Aizhan Imangaliyeva

    (Tynyshpayev Kazakh Academy of Transport and Communication, Almaty, Kazaksthan.)

Abstract

The economy of Kazakhstan is the first economy in Central Asia and the second among Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) countries after Russia. On rates of hydrocarbon raw materials extraction Kazakhstan is included into first ten countries of the world. Kazakhstani economy is based on heavy industry, ferrous and non-ferrous metals, and oil and gas. And it allows Kazakhstan is being on the road of economic growth. With economic growth, the energy production and consumption are also increasing rapidly, resulting first of all, on harmful carbon emissions. Thus, the purpose of this research is to carry out a comparative assessment in the energy sector development and to submit forecast of its demand and its environmental impact in terms of Kazakhstani economic growth up to 2040. First scenario (Base Case) assumes conventional development pattern together with neither significant changes in the patterns of energy supply and demand nor extensively changed policies and measures. The second one (Mitigation) assumes a technological improvement, regulation and industrial development policies and additional policies which have been designed to promote energy efficiency and reduce emissions across the economy. The simulations are applied until the year 2040, while 2015 is set as the base year. The findings suggest in both scenarios Kazakhstan will continue to pursue its economic development driving energy demand and carbon emissions will also raise. However, under Mitigation Scenario, emission intensity will be lower insignificantly.

Suggested Citation

  • Galiya Movkebayeva & Aliya Aktymbayeva & Yuliya Tyurina & Nurken Baikadamov & Kamar Beketova & Marija Troyanskaya & Sholpan Smagulova & Aizhan Imangaliyeva, 2020. "Energy Security and Sustainability in Eurasian Economic Union in the Terms of Economic Growth: The Case of Kazakhstan s Energy Sector up to 2040 Perspectives," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(2), pages 497-503.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2020-02-58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/9073/4929
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/9073/4929
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mirlan Aldayarov & Istvan Dobozi & Thomas Nikolakakis, 2017. "Stuck in Transition," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 25742, December.
    2. Cai, Wenjia & Wang, Can & Wang, Ke & Zhang, Ying & Chen, Jining, 2007. "Scenario analysis on CO2 emissions reduction potential in China's electricity sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 6445-6456, December.
    3. Karatayev, Marat & Hall, Stephen & Kalyuzhnova, Yelena & Clarke, Michèle L., 2016. "Renewable energy technology uptake in Kazakhstan: Policy drivers and barriers in a transitional economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 120-136.
    4. Zhanar ABDUKARIMOVA & Kairat BITEMIROV & Nurlan BIZHAN & Askat ESENALIYEV & Nursultan POSHANOV & Zhanna KALKANOVA, 2018. "Features of Compensation for Damage Caused to Natural Resources in Kazakhstan," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 9(4), pages 1169-1175.
    5. Makpal Bekturganova & Azimkhan Satybaldin & Bakhyt Yessekina, 2019. "Conceptual Framework for the Formation of Low-carbon Development: Kazakhstan s Experience," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(1), pages 48-56.
    6. Karatayev, Marat & Clarke, Michèle L., 2016. "A review of current energy systems and green energy potential in Kazakhstan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 491-504.
    7. Wang, Ke & Wang, Can & Lu, Xuedu & Chen, Jining, 2007. "Scenario analysis on CO2 emissions reduction potential in China's iron and steel industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 2320-2335, April.
    8. repec:srs:journl:jarle:v:9:y:2018:i:4:p:1169-1175 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aliya Aktymbayeva & Arailym Orazgaliyeva & Aizhan Omarova & Anvar Tulaganov & Aigul Akhmetova & Yuliya Tyurina & Marija Troyanskaya, 2021. "The Central Asian Economies of Water-energy security: The Future Role of Hydro and Fuel-based Systems," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(1), pages 417-425.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena Shadrina, 2020. "Non-Hydropower Renewable Energy in Central Asia: Assessment of Deployment Status and Analysis of Underlying Factors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    2. Assel K. Kozhakhmetova & Kenzhebek T. Gabdullin & Duissekul A. Kunanbayeva & Samal K. Tazhiyeva & Renata E. Kydaybergenova, 2019. "Green Energy Project`s Efficiency: A Cross-industry Evaluation," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(5), pages 207-215.
    3. Boute, Anatole, 2020. "Regulatory stability and renewable energy investment: The case of Kazakhstan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    4. Kermeli, Katerina & Edelenbosch, Oreane Y. & Crijns-Graus, Wina & van Ruijven, Bas J. & van Vuuren, Detlef P. & Worrell, Ernst, 2022. "Improving material projections in Integrated Assessment Models: The use of a stock-based versus a flow-based approach for the iron and steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    5. Perwez, Usama & Sohail, Ahmed & Hassan, Syed Fahad & Zia, Usman, 2015. "The long-term forecast of Pakistan's electricity supply and demand: An application of long range energy alternatives planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2423-2435.
    6. An, Runying & Yu, Biying & Li, Ru & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2018. "Potential of energy savings and CO2 emission reduction in China’s iron and steel industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 862-880.
    7. Wang, Yanxiang & Ali Almazrooei, Shaikha & Kapsalyamova, Zhanna & Diabat, Ali & Tsai, I-Tsung, 2016. "Utility subsidy reform in Abu Dhabi: A review and a Computable General Equilibrium analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1352-1362.
    8. Kale, Rajesh V. & Pohekar, Sanjay D., 2014. "Electricity demand and supply scenarios for Maharashtra (India) for 2030: An application of long range energy alternatives planning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1-13.
    9. Gao, Tianming & Shen, Lei & Shen, Ming & Liu, Litao & Chen, Fengnan & Gao, Li, 2017. "Evolution and projection of CO2 emissions for China's cement industry from 1980 to 2020," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 522-537.
    10. Li, Yongliang & Cao, Hui & Wang, Shuhao & Jin, Yi & Li, Dacheng & Wang, Xiang & Ding, Yulong, 2014. "Load shifting of nuclear power plants using cryogenic energy storage technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1710-1716.
    11. Alshammari, Yousef M. & Sarathy, S. Mani, 2017. "Achieving 80% greenhouse gas reduction target in Saudi Arabia under low and medium oil prices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 502-511.
    12. Zhu, Bing & Zhou, Wenji & Hu, Shanying & Li, Qiang & Griffy-Brown, Charla & Jin, Yong, 2010. "CO2 emissions and reduction potential in China’s chemical industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4663-4670.
    13. Xiaopeng Guo & Xiaodan Guo & Jiahai Yuan, 2014. "Impact Analysis of Air Pollutant Emission Policies on Thermal Coal Supply Chain Enterprises in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Feng, Chao & Huang, Jian-Bai & Wang, Miao, 2019. "The sustainability of China’s metal industries: features, challenges and future focuses," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 215-224.
    15. Hu, Yu & Monroy, Carlos Rodríguez, 2012. "Chinese energy and climate policies after Durban: Save the Kyoto Protocol," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3243-3250.
    16. Lin, Boqiang & Wang, Xiaolei, 2015. "Carbon emissions from energy intensive industry in China: Evidence from the iron & steel industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 746-754.
    17. Pauliuk, Stefan & Wang, Tao & Müller, Daniel B., 2013. "Steel all over the world: Estimating in-use stocks of iron for 200 countries," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 22-30.
    18. Li, Yuan & Zhu, Lei, 2014. "Cost of energy saving and CO2 emissions reduction in China’s iron and steel sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 603-616.
    19. Chen, Hao & Tang, Bao-Jun & Liao, Hua & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2016. "A multi-period power generation planning model incorporating the non-carbon external costs: A case study of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1333-1345.
    20. Subramanyam, Veena & Kumar, Amit & Talaei, Alireza & Mondal, Md. Alam Hossain, 2017. "Energy efficiency improvement opportunities and associated greenhouse gas abatement costs for the residential sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 795-807.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Kazakhstan; energy; carbon dioxide; economic growth;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • Q40 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - General
    • Q43 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Energy and the Macroeconomy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2020-02-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.