IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/2017-01-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Current State of Malaysia s Journey towards a Green Economy: The Perceptions of the Companies on Environmental Efficiency and Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Hussin Abdullah

    (School of Economics, Finance and Banking, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia)

  • Nor Aznin Abu Bakar

    (School of Economics, Finance and Banking, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia,)

  • Mohd Razani Mohd Jali

    (School of Economics, Finance and Banking, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia)

  • Fatimah Wati Ibrahim

    (School of Economics, Finance and Banking, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia.)

Abstract

Malaysia is committed to fostering the development of a clean and efficient economy; that is, a green economy. This means encouraging the development of green businesses and green products, which in turn will create green jobs. The current economic and environmental crises have accelerated during the last two decades: Global warming in climate; fuel, food, water and the economy as a whole. At the fundamental level, there exists a misallocation of resources. Relatively little capital was invested in energy efficiency, sustainable agriculture, ecosystem, land and water conservation. This pattern of development and growth has had detrimental impacts on the well-being of current generations and presents risk and challenges for future generations. As Malaysia promotes greater environmental awareness, it is important to establish national benchmarks by which to measure progress toward a greener economy. This study seeks to advance the state of knowledge in Malaysia on the green economy. To achieve this we need to be able to measure resources, economic activity and progress, accurately and appropriately. The result also indicates that an increase in the prioritizing green economy projected by the companies operating in Malaysia will lead to increase in green economic sustainability. This implies that the progress towards the green economy in Malaysia is also influenced by the perception of its importance in the future. The analysis reveals that increase in green economy awareness among the firms will lead to increase in the level of environmental sustainability, thereby improving the current state of green economy in Malaysia. Moreover, an increase in the green economy priority by the companies increases its sustainability in the economy

Suggested Citation

  • Hussin Abdullah & Nor Aznin Abu Bakar & Mohd Razani Mohd Jali & Fatimah Wati Ibrahim, 2017. "The Current State of Malaysia s Journey towards a Green Economy: The Perceptions of the Companies on Environmental Efficiency and Sustainability," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 253-258.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2017-01-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/3707/2589
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/3707/2589
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jushan Bai & Serena Ng, 2005. "Tests for Skewness, Kurtosis, and Normality for Time Series Data," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 23, pages 49-60, January.
    2. Chialin Chen, 2001. "Design for the Environment: A Quality-Based Model for Green Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 250-263, February.
    3. Bina, Olivia & La Camera, Francesco, 2011. "Promise and shortcomings of a green turn in recent policy responses to the “double crisis”," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(12), pages 2308-2316.
    4. Roszaini Haniffa & Mohammad Hudaib, 2006. "Corporate Governance Structure and Performance of Malaysian Listed Companies," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(7-8), pages 1034-1062.
    5. Christopher Wilson & Ian David Williams & Simon Kemp, 2011. "Compliance with Producer Responsibility Legislation: Experiences from UK Small and Medium‐sized Enterprises," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(5), pages 310-330, July.
    6. Roszaini Haniffa & Mohammad Hudaib, 2006. "Corporate Governance Structure and Performance of Malaysian Listed Companies," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(7‐8), pages 1034-1062, September.
    7. Breusch, T S & Pagan, A R, 1979. "A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(5), pages 1287-1294, September.
    8. James C. Brau & Gary M. Woller, 2004. "Microfinance: A Comprehensive Review of the Existing Literature," Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, Pepperdine University, Graziadio School of Business and Management, vol. 9(1), pages 1-28, Spring.
    9. Douglas Gollin & Michael Morris & Derek Byerlee, 2005. "Technology Adoption in Intensive Post-Green Revolution Systems," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 87(5), pages 1310-1316.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valeria Ferreira Gregorio & Laia Pié & Antonio Terceño, 2018. "A Systematic Literature Review of Bio, Green and Circular Economy Trends in Publications in the Field of Economics and Business Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-39, November.
    2. repec:eco:journ2:2017-04-26 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Nor Aznin Abu Bakar & Jimoh Olajide Raji & Rana Muhammad Adeel-Farooq, 2019. "Greenfield, Mergers & Acquisitions, Energy Consumption, and Environmental Performance in selected SAARC and ASEAN countries," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(2), pages 216-224.
    4. Suparjo Suparjo & Surya Darma & Nia Kurniadin & Jati Kasuma & Priyagus Priyagus & Dio Caisar Darma & Haryadi Haryadi, 2021. "Indonesia s New SDGs Agenda for Green Growth Emphasis in the Energy Sector," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(3), pages 395-402.
    5. Nor Aznin Abu Bakar & Hussin Abdullah & Fatimah Wati Ibrahim & Mohd Razani Mohd Jali, 2017. "Green Economy: Evaluation of Malaysian Company Environmental Sustainability," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 139-143.
    6. Francesca Di Pillo & Massimo Gastaldi & Nathan Levialdi & Michela Miliacca, 2017. "Environmental Performance Versus Economic-financial Performance: Evidence from Italian Firms," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 98-108.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Djoko Roespinoedji & Roeshartono Roespinoedji & Mohammed R.A. Siam & Mohd Farid Shamsudin, 2019. "An Empirical Study on Short Term and Long-term Consequences of Crude Oil on Economic Wellbeing of Indonesia by Applying Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(5), pages 474-480.
    2. Henry Kimathi Mukaria & Mirie Mwangi & Duncan Elly Ochieng & Kennedy Okiro, 2020. "Mediating Effect of Agency Cost on the Relationship between Ownership Structure and Firm Value," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 1-3.
    3. Ebrahim, Ahmed & Fattah, Tarek Abdel, 2015. "Corporate governance and initial compliance with IFRS in emerging markets: The case of income tax accounting in Egypt," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 46-60.
    4. Martin Kyere & Marcel Ausloos, 2021. "Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 1871-1885, April.
    5. Emmanuel Chuke Nwude & Musa Sani Zakirai & Comfort Amaka Nwude, 2023. "Ownership Structure and Bank Performance in Emerging Market Economy: Evidence From Nigerian Listed Deposit Money Banks," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    6. Mousa Sharaf Adin Hezam Saleh & Yusnidah Ibrahim & Hanita Kadir Shahar, 2020. "The Simultaneous Effect of Corporate Ownership on Dividends and Capital Structure: Malaysian Evidence," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(6), pages 46-62, December.
    7. Rimon Emile & Aiman Ragab & Sandy Kyaw, 2014. "The Effect of Corporate Governance on Firm Performance, Evidence from Egypt," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(12), pages 1865-1877, December.
    8. Ali Uyar & Cemil Kuzey & Merve Kilic & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2021. "Board structure, financial performance, corporate social responsibility performance, CSR committee, and CEO duality: Disentangling the connection in healthcare," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1730-1748, November.
    9. Trang Cam Hoang & Indra Abeysekera & Shiguang Ma, 2018. "Board Diversity and Corporate Social Disclosure: Evidence from Vietnam," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 833-852, September.
    10. Abdullah A K Alkhawaldeh & Jamil J Jaber & Dalila Boughaci & Noriszura Ismail, 2021. "A novel investigation of the influence of corporate governance on firms’ credit ratings," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Ayodeji Matthew Adejuwon & Felix Olurankinse & Olugbenga Jinadu, 2020. "Corporate Determinants and Human Resource Accounting Disclosure of Listed Banks in Nigeria," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(4), pages 303317-3033, December.
    12. Nazaria Md Aris & Suzila Mohamed Yusof & Lim Jia Wen, 2019. "Analysis of Corporate Governance and Bank Performance: Empirical Evidence From Malaysian Banking Industry," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(3), pages 82-99, December.
    13. Dr. Baker Ahmad Aledwan & Dr. Omar Mohammed Zraqat & Dr. Lina Fuad Murwih Hussien, 2017. "The Impact of Ownership Structure on the Insurance Companies Applicability of Corporate Governance Instructions," Journal of Business & Management (COES&RJ-JBM), , vol. 5(3), pages 131-152, July.
    14. Oehmichen, Jana, 2018. "East meets west—Corporate governance in Asian emerging markets: A literature review and research agenda," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 465-480.
    15. Abdul Majid, Jamaliah, 2015. "Reporting incentives, ownership concentration by the largest outside shareholder, and reported goodwill impairment losses," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 199-214.
    16. Aastvedt, Tonje Marthinsen & Behmiri, Niaz Bashiri & Lu, Li, 2021. "Does green innovation damage financial performance of oil and gas companies?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    17. Rahimah Mohamed Yunos Author_Email: rahim221@johor.uitm.edu.my & Malcolm Smith & Zubaidah Ismail & Syahrul Ahmar Ahmad, 2011. "Inside Concentrated Owners, Board Of Directors And Accounting Conservatism," Annual Summit on Business and Entrepreneurial Studies (ASBES 2011) Proceeding 2011-053-178, Conference Master Resources.
    18. Abdul Wahab, Nor Shaipah & Holland, Kevin, 2012. "Tax planning, corporate governance and equity value," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 111-124.
    19. Nor Farizal Mohammed & Zuraidah Mohd Sanusi & Fahdah Sultan Alsudairi, 2017. "Corporate Governance and Malaysian Politics: Theoretical Framework for Accounting Quality," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 188-195.
    20. Tuan Nguyen, 2017. "Do Female Directors Add Value?," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 13(3), pages 169-177, JUNE.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Green Economy; Environmental Efficiency; Sustainability; Perceptions of the Companies;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2017-01-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.