IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/2015-02-01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review Paper on Economic Growth Aggregate Energy Consumption Nexus

Author

Listed:
  • Zaidi Isa

    (School of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.)

  • Ahmed R.M. Al Sayed

    (School of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.)

  • Sek Siok Kun

    (School of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to survey the empirical studies which interested in detecting the causal relationship between energy consumption (EC) and economic growth, and to provide some recommendations to policymakers for designing the environmental policies and policy implications of effective energy. Our review paper concentrates to make a survey depending on included variables in the studies, thus it has been classified into two groups; bivariate framework and multivariate framework. The results show that the multivariate studies support the feedback hypothesis more than the bivariate studies with (45.7%) and (29.5%) respectively. In contrast of that in neutrality hypothesis, the bivariate framework studies support it with (26.2%) which is more than that in multivariate framework (12.1%) only. In the other hand the results by considering the whole empirical studies in our survey support the hypotheses as the following; (34.3%), (24.0%), (19.7%) and (22.0%) for the feedback, growth, conservation d neutrality hypothesis respectively. Moreover we provide some suggestions for future studies; it should focuses more on new approaches consist the multivariate framework rather than by applying common methods with the same variables in bivariate framework only, which could be solved by adding unprecedented variables such as technology innovation, index investment and environmental quality with applying environmental Kuznets curve. In the analysis should considers the possibility of structural breaks, the coefficients signs, and distinguish between the short and long run causality relationship. And it should include two distinct groups of EC; renewable and nonrenewable energy rather than aggregate or disaggregate energy consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Zaidi Isa & Ahmed R.M. Al Sayed & Sek Siok Kun, 2015. "Review Paper on Economic Growth Aggregate Energy Consumption Nexus," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 5(2), pages 385-401.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2015-02-01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/991/642
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/991/642
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mustafa G zen, 2014. "Renewable Energy Support Mechanism in Turkey: Financial Analysis and Recommendations to Policymakers," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 4(2), pages 274-287.
    2. Baris, Kemal & Kucukali, Serhat, 2012. "Availibility of renewable energy sources in Turkey: Current situation, potential, government policies and the EU perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 377-391.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mustafa Gozen, 2015. "Unlicensed Renewable Energy Generation: A Review of Regulation and Applications in the Context of Turkey," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13.
    2. Yousefi-Sahzabi, Amin & Unlu-Yucesoy, Eda & Sasaki, Kyuro & Yuosefi, Hossein & Widiatmojo, Arif & Sugai, Yuichi, 2017. "Turkish challenges for low-carbon society: Current status, government policies and social acceptance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 596-608.
    3. Ozcan, Mustafa, 2018. "The role of renewables in increasing Turkey's self-sufficiency in electrical energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2629-2639.
    4. repec:eco:journ2:2017-04-06 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Abdul, Daud & Wenqi, Jiang & Tanveer, Arsalan, 2022. "Prioritization of renewable energy source for electricity generation through AHP-VIKOR integrated methodology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1018-1032.
    6. Aytav, Emre & Kocar, Günnur, 2013. "Biodiesel from the perspective of Turkey: Past, present and future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 335-350.
    7. Ezbakhe, Fatine & Pérez-Foguet, Agustí, 2021. "Decision analysis for sustainable development: The case of renewable energy planning under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 601-613.
    8. Gökay Bayrak & Davut Ertekin & Hassan Haes Alhelou & Pierluigi Siano, 2021. "A Real-Time Energy Management System Design for a Developed PV-Based Distributed Generator Considering the Grid Code Requirements in Turkey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-21, October.
    9. Eksi, Guner & Karaosmanoglu, Filiz, 2017. "Combined bioheat and biopower: A technology review and an assessment for Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1313-1332.
    10. Kaplan, Yusuf Alper, 2015. "Overview of wind energy in the world and assessment of current wind energy policies in Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 562-568.
    11. G lden B l k, 2013. "Renewable Energy: Policy Issues and Economic Implications in Turkey," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 3(2), pages 153-167.
    12. Chen, Sai & Song, Yan & Zhang, Ming, 2021. "Study on the sustainability evaluation and development path selection of China’s coal base from the perspective of spatial field," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).
    13. Romano, Antonio A. & Scandurra, Giuseppe & Carfora, Alfonso & Fodor, Mate, 2017. "Renewable investments: The impact of green policies in developing and developed countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 738-747.
    14. Eyidogan, Muharrem & Canka Kilic, Fatma & Kaya, Durmus & Coban, Volkan & Cagman, Selman, 2016. "Investigation of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) technologies in Turkey from the technical and economic point of view," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 885-895.
    15. Martin, Nigel & Rice, John, 2015. "Improving Australia's renewable energy project policy and planning: A multiple stakeholder analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 128-141.
    16. Katarzyna Chudy-Laskowska & Tomasz Pisula & Mirosław Liana & László Vasa, 2020. "Taxonomic Analysis of the Diversity in the Level of Wind Energy Development in European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, August.
    17. Ekaterina V. Nezhnikova & Irina V. Okhremenko & Oksana V. Papelniuk, 2018. "Investigation of the Features of Investment in the Development of Renewable Energy Sources: Main Consumers, Legal Regulation, Equipment, Rates and Delivery," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(4), pages 178-186.
    18. Bulut, Umit & Muratoglu, Gonul, 2018. "Renewable energy in Turkey: Great potential, low but increasing utilization, and an empirical analysis on renewable energy-growth nexus," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 240-250.
    19. Ozturk, Munir & Saba, Naheed & Altay, Volkan & Iqbal, Rizwan & Hakeem, Khalid Rehman & Jawaid, Mohammad & Ibrahim, Faridah Hanum, 2017. "Biomass and bioenergy: An overview of the development potential in Turkey and Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1285-1302.
    20. Fatma Canka Kilic, 2016. "Geothermal Energy in Turkey," Energy & Environment, , vol. 27(3-4), pages 360-376, May.
    21. Murat Sirin, Selahattin & Ege, Aylin, 2012. "Overcoming problems in Turkey's renewable energy policy: How can EU contribute?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4917-4926.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economic Growth; Aggregate Energy Consumption; Causality Relationship;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q4 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy
    • Q43 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Energy and the Macroeconomy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2015-02-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.