IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/maorev/v13y2017i04p713-738_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Measurement Model for Dignity, Face, and Honor Cultural Norms

Author

Listed:
  • Yao, Jingjing
  • Ramirez-Marin, Jimena
  • Brett, Jeanne
  • Aslani, Soroush
  • Semnani-Azad, Zhaleh

Abstract

In this work we develop and validate a model measuring norms that distinguish three types of culture: dignity, face, and honor (Leung & Cohen, 2011). Our motivation is to produce empirical evidence for this new cultural framework and use the framework to explain cultural differences in interdependent social interactions such as negotiation. In two studies, we establish the content validity, construct validity, predictive validity, and measurement invariance of this measurement model. In Study 1, we present the model's three-factor structure and situate the constructs of dignity, face, and honor in a nomological network of cultural constructs. In Study 2, which uses a sample of participants from 26 cultures, we show that the measurement model discriminates among people from the three cultural regions corresponding to the dignity, face, and honor framework. In particular, we report differences between face and honor cultures, which are not distinguished in other cultural frameworks (e.g., Hofstede, 1980). We also show that the measurement model accounts for cultural differences in norms for use of negotiation strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao, Jingjing & Ramirez-Marin, Jimena & Brett, Jeanne & Aslani, Soroush & Semnani-Azad, Zhaleh, 2017. "A Measurement Model for Dignity, Face, and Honor Cultural Norms," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 713-738, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:13:y:2017:i:04:p:713-738_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740877617000493/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ogliastri, Enrique & Quintanilla, Carlos & Benetti, Sara, 2023. "International negotiation prototypes: The impact of culture," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    2. Bahman Paul Ebrahimi & Sandra A. Young, 2023. "Managerial motivation in China: replication and extension of miner’s hierarchical role motivation theory," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 91-112, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:13:y:2017:i:04:p:713-738_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.