IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jadres/v44y2004i04p327-332_04.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decay Effects in Online Advertising: Quantifying the Impact of Time Since Last Exposure on Branding Effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • HAVLENA, WILLIAM J.
  • GRAHAM, JEFFREY

Abstract

Advertising effectiveness tests combining surveys and electronic tracking of online advertising are common, and the method is increasingly being utilized within more comprehensive, cross-media methodologies. The validity of these tests, however, has sometimes been called into question because of the short duration between online advertising exposure and survey taking. Using a unique database containing more than 1,600 online advertising campaigns, we find that there is a measurable but weak relationship between time since last exposure and branding effectiveness, indicating the shortness of duration does not have a substantial impact on the validity of these tests.

Suggested Citation

  • Havlena, William J. & Graham, Jeffrey, 2004. "Decay Effects in Online Advertising: Quantifying the Impact of Time Since Last Exposure on Branding Effectiveness," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(4), pages 327-332, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jadres:v:44:y:2004:i:04:p:327-332_04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0021849904040401/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christine Bauer & Christine Strauss, 2016. "Location-based advertising on mobile devices," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 159-194, June.
    2. Jiemiao Chen & Xiaojing Yang & Robert E. Smith, 2016. "The effects of creativity on advertising wear-in and wear-out," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 334-349, May.
    3. Oliver Rutz & Randolph Bucklin, 2012. "Does banner advertising affect browsing for brands? clickstream choice model says yes, for some," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 231-257, June.
    4. Xiaoxue Li & Sarah S. Stith, 2020. "Health insurance and self‐assessed health: New evidence from Affordable Care Act repeal fear," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(9), pages 1078-1085, September.
    5. Fortenberry Jr., John L. & McGoldrick, Peter J., 2011. "Receptiveness of Black Americans to outdoor advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(6), pages 586-593, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jadres:v:44:y:2004:i:04:p:327-332_04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.