IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000443/016928.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Concentración de la propiedad y su efecto sobre la liquidez de las acciones del mercado bursátil colombiano, periodo 2010-2016

Author

Listed:
  • Erdwin Fernando García Martínez

Abstract

Este artículo analiza el efecto de la concentración de la propiedad accionaria (mixta o privada) sobre la liquidez de las acciones del merco bursátil colombiano; para ello estudia una muestra representativa de quince empresas que cotizaron en este mercado durante el periodo 2010-2016. Los resultados obtenidos evidencian que la concentración de la propiedad accionaria influye de manera inversa en la liquidez, con mayores efectos para las empresas privadas; sin embargo, tiene un nivel bajo de significancia que se explica por aspectos relacionados con el uso de información en cuanto a la emisión y colocación de acciones por parte de las empresas.

Suggested Citation

  • Erdwin Fernando García Martínez, 2018. "Concentración de la propiedad y su efecto sobre la liquidez de las acciones del mercado bursátil colombiano, periodo 2010-2016," Revista Finanzas y Politica Economica, Universidad Católica de Colombia, vol. 10(2), pages 327-348, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000443:016928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/RFYPE/article/view/1919/2193
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aitken, Michael & Comerton-Forde, Carole, 2003. "How should liquidity be measured?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 45-59, January.
    2. Amihud, Yakov, 2002. "Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 31-56, January.
    3. Diego Alonso Agudelo Rueda, 2010. "Liquidez en los mercados accionarios colombianos. Cuánto hemos avanzado en los últimos 10 anos?," Documentos de Trabajo de Valor Público 10654, Universidad EAFIT.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johannes A. Skjeltorp & Bernt Arne Ødegaard, 2009. "The information content of market liquidity: An empirical analysis of liquidity at the Oslo Stock Exchange?," Working Paper 2009/26, Norges Bank.
    2. Vidović Jelena & Poklepović Tea & Aljinović Zdravka, 2014. "How to Measure Illiquidity on European Emerging Stock Markets?," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 5(3), pages 67-81, September.
    3. Thomas Paul & Thomas Walther & André Küster-Simic, 2022. "Empirical analysis of the illiquidity premia of German real estate securities," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 36(2), pages 203-260, June.
    4. Langedijk, Sven & Monokroussos, George & Papanagiotou, Evangelia, 2015. "Benchmarking Liquidity Proxies: Accounting for Dynamics and Frequency Issues," MPRA Paper 61865, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Damien Kunjal, 2022. "Evaluating the Liquidity Response of South African Exchange-Traded Funds to Country Risk Effects," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Shih-Ping Feng, 2011. "The Liquidity Effect In Option Pricing: An Empirical Analysis," The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(2), pages 35-43.
    7. Benson, Karen & Faff, Robert & Smith, Tom, 2015. "Injecting liquidity into liquidity research," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(PB), pages 533-540.
    8. Foo, Yee-Boon & Zain, Mazlina Mat, 2010. "Board independence, board diligence and liquidity in Malaysia: A research note," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 92-100.
    9. Francisco Javier Vasquez-Tejos & Prosper Lamothe Fernández, 2020. "Liquidity Risk and Stock Return in Latin American Emerging Markets," Investigación & Desarrollo 0420, Universidad Privada Boliviana, revised Nov 2020.
    10. Nneji, Ogonna, 2015. "Liquidity shocks and stock bubbles," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 132-146.
    11. Hagströmer, Björn & Anderson, Richard G. & Binner, Jane & Nilsson, Birger, 2009. "Dynamics in Systematic Liquidity," Working Papers 2009:7, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    12. Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar, 2009. "The implications of liquidity and order flows for neoclassical finance," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 527-532, November.
    13. Chang, Yuk Ying & Faff, Robert & Hwang, Chuan-Yang, 2010. "Liquidity and stock returns in Japan: New evidence," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 90-115, January.
    14. Saffi, Pedro, 2008. "Expected returns and liquidity risk: Does entrepreneurial income matter?," IESE Research Papers D/749, IESE Business School.
    15. Dayanandan, Ajit & Donker, Han & Karahan, Gökhan, 2017. "Do voluntary disclosures of bad news improve liquidity?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 16-29.
    16. Xuan Vinh Vo, 2023. "Large Shareholders And Information Asymmetry In A Transition Economy €“ Evidence From Vietnam," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 68(05), pages 1551-1567, September.
    17. Chollete, Lorán & Næs, Randi & Skjeltorp, Johannes A., 2006. "Pricing Implications of Shared Variance in Liquidity Measures," Discussion Papers 2006/9, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science, revised 21 Jun 2007.
    18. Guillaume, F., 2015. "The LIX: A model-independent liquidity index," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 214-231.
    19. Ødegaard, Bernt Arne, 2016. "Bond Liquidity at the Oslo Stock Exchange," UiS Working Papers in Economics and Finance 2016/16, University of Stavanger.
    20. Feng, Shih-Ping & Hung, Mao-Wei & Wang, Yaw-Huei, 2014. "Option pricing with stochastic liquidity risk: Theory and evidence," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 77-95.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    acciones; concentración de la propiedad; liquidez; mercado bursátil.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000443:016928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Universidad Católica de Colombia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuccco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.