IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000172/019316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Afinidades violentas: la evolución de la red de narcotraficantes del norte del Valle

Author

Listed:
  • Boris Salazar-Trujillo
  • María Isabel Caicedo-Hurtado
  • Gildardo Vanegas-Muñoz

Abstract

Resumen: Este artículo reconstruye y explica el ascenso y decadencia de la red de narcotraficantes del norte del Valle durante el período 1994-2011. Argumenta que la convergencia de las fuerzas centrífugas, propias del carácter volátil de las agrupaciones de narcotraficantes, la afinidad violenta que unía a sus jefes, la guerra contra las drogas, y los choques informativos generados por la nueva estrategia de negociación con la justicia estadounidense condujeron a su destrucción por mano propia y a la fragmentación de su estructura. Este artículo sugiere que el carácter óptimo de las estrategias de remoción del jugador clave funcionan para una red específica, pero no es efectiva en lo absoluto para las redes mutantes que surgen de los restos de las destruidas. Palabras clave: violencia criminal; redes sociales; carteles de narcotráfico; homicidios.

Suggested Citation

  • Boris Salazar-Trujillo & María Isabel Caicedo-Hurtado & Gildardo Vanegas-Muñoz, 2021. "Afinidades violentas: la evolución de la red de narcotraficantes del norte del Valle," Revista Sociedad y Economía, Universidad del Valle, CIDSE, issue 42, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000172:019316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://sociedadyeconomia.univalle.edu.co/index.php/sociedad_y_economia/%20article%20/view%20/8973
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leonardo Raffo López & José Luis Segura, 2015. "Las redes del narcotráfico y sus interacciones: un modelo teórico," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 17(32), pages 183-212, January-J.
    2. Coralio Ballester & Antoni Calvó-Armengol & Yves Zenou, 2006. "Who's Who in Networks. Wanted: The Key Player," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(5), pages 1403-1417, September.
    3. Antoni Calvó-Armengol & Inés Moreno de Barreda, 2005. "Optimal Targets in Small and Large Networks, Using Game Theory," Working Papers 176, Barcelona School of Economics.
    4. Giovanni Mastrobuoni & Eleonora Patacchini, 2010. "Understanding Organized Crime Networks: Evidence Based on Federal Bureau of Narcotics Secret Files on American Mafia," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 152, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    5. Sergey Gavrilets & Edgar A Duenez-Guzman & Michael D Vose, 2008. "Dynamics of Alliance Formation and the Egalitarian Revolution," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(10), pages 1-9, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leonardo Raffo López & José Luis Segura, 2018. "La ineficacia de las políticas de represión a la oferta de drogas: una explicación alternativa," Ensayos de Economía 16782, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Medellín.
    2. Marco Battaglini & Eleonora Patacchini & Edoardo Rainone, 2019. "Endogenous Social Connections in Legislatures," NBER Working Papers 25988, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Nizar Allouch, 2017. "Aggregation in Networks," Studies in Economics 1718, School of Economics, University of Kent.
    4. Sergio Currarini & Carmen Marchiori & Alessandro Tavoni, 2016. "Network Economics and the Environment: Insights and Perspectives," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 65(1), pages 159-189, September.
    5. David Rezza Baqaee & Emmanuel Farhi, 2019. "The Macroeconomic Impact of Microeconomic Shocks: Beyond Hulten's Theorem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 87(4), pages 1155-1203, July.
    6. Greenwood, Robin & Landier, Augustin & Thesmar, David, 2015. "Vulnerable banks," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(3), pages 471-485.
    7. Renaud Bourlès & Yann Bramoullé & Eduardo Perez‐Richet, 2017. "Altruism in Networks," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 85, pages 675-689, March.
    8. Hugh-Jones, David & Ooi, Jinnie, 2023. "Where do fairness preferences come from? Norm transmission in a teen friendship network," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Daron Acemoglu & Vasco M. Carvalho & Asuman Ozdaglar & Alireza Tahbaz‐Salehi, 2012. "The Network Origins of Aggregate Fluctuations," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 80(5), pages 1977-2016, September.
    10. Antonio Acconcia & Giovanni Immordino & Salvatore Piccolo & Patrick Rey, 2014. "Accomplice Witnesses and Organized Crime: Theory and Evidence from Italy," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 116(4), pages 1116-1159, October.
    11. Markus Kinateder & Luca Paolo Merlino, 2021. "The Evolution of Networks and Local Public Good Provision: A Potential Approach," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-12, July.
    12. Antonio Cabrales & Piero Gottardi & Fernando Vega-Redondo, 2017. "Risk Sharing and Contagion in Networks," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(9), pages 3086-3127.
    13. Allouch, Nizar, 2017. "The cost of segregation in (social) networks," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 329-342.
    14. Rusinowska, Agnieszka & Taalaibekova, Akylai, 2019. "Opinion formation and targeting when persuaders have extreme and centrist opinions," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 9-27.
    15. Thomas J. Sargent & John Stachurski, 2022. "Economic Networks: Theory and Computation," Papers 2203.11972, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    16. Maryam Farboodi, 2014. "Intermediation and Voluntary Exposure to Counterparty Risk," 2014 Meeting Papers 365, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    17. Liu, Xiaodong & Patacchini, Eleonora & Zenou, Yves & Lee, Lung-Fei, 2011. "Criminal Networks: Who is the Key Player?," Research Papers in Economics 2011:7, Stockholm University, Department of Economics.
    18. Jingjing Zhao & Yongli Li & Yunlong Ding & Chao Liu, 2019. "The value of leading customers in a crowdfunding-based marketing pattern," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Agnieszka Rusinowska & Rudolf Berghammer & Harrie de Swart & Michel Grabisch, 2011. "Social networks: Prestige, centrality, and influence (Invited paper)," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00633859, HAL.
    20. Gabrielle Demange, 2018. "Contagion in Financial Networks: A Threat Index," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 955-970, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000172:019316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CENDOC (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cicevco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.