IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v6y2021i3p119-135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Morphological Evolution of the Port‐City Interface of Algiers (16th Century to the Present)

Author

Listed:
  • Khalil Bachir Aouissi

    (Laboratory PUViT, Ferhat Abbas University Setif 1, Algeria)

  • Said Madani

    (Laboratory PUViT, Ferhat Abbas University Setif 1, Algeria)

  • Vincent Baptist

    (Erasmus School of History, Culture and Communication, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

This article traces the centuries-long morphological development of Algiers’ port-city interface across four historically relevant time periods that together span from the dawn of the 16th century up until today. Through a diachronic and geo-historical approach, we identify and analyse the origins of Algiers’ persistent port-city divide. In doing so, the notion of the interface is interpreted as a spatial threshold between city and port, which nevertheless supports the material flows of both entities. As a multi-purpose area, the interface holds the potential to weave the disparate entities of a port city back together. To further complement this conceptual angle, we provide investigations of porosity that determine the differing degrees of connectivity between the city and port of Algiers. This is combined with a spatial-functional analysis of Algiers’ current port-city interface, which is ultimately characterised as a non-homogeneous entity composed of four distinct sequences. These results contribute to a better orientation of imminent plans for waterfront revitalisations in Algiers. Whereas the interface was long considered as some kind of no man’s land in the past, port and municipal authorities nowadays aim to turn the interface into a tool of reconciliation, and can do so by acting upon its potential porosity. Finally, this article’s critical examination of the previously neglected case of Algiers can and should also be considered as an applicable model for the continuing study of southern Mediterranean and African port metropolises in general, which share a particular evolution in the relations between city and port.

Suggested Citation

  • Khalil Bachir Aouissi & Said Madani & Vincent Baptist, 2021. "Morphological Evolution of the Port‐City Interface of Algiers (16th Century to the Present)," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 119-135.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:6:y:2021:i:3:p:119-135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4017
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Hall & Wouter Jacobs, 2010. "Shifting Proximities: The Maritime Ports Sector in an Era of Global Supply Chains," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(9), pages 1103-1115.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anastasiia Dubinina & Aleksandra Wawrzyńska & Karolina A. Krośnicka, 2022. "Permeability of Waterfronts—Contemporary Approach in Designing Urban Blue Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wouter Jacobs & Theo Notteboom, 2011. "An Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Port Systems: The Role of Windows of Opportunity in Shaping Seaport Competition," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(7), pages 1674-1692, July.
    2. Koi Yu Adolf Ng & César Ducruet, 2014. "The changing tides of port geography (1950–2012)," Post-Print halshs-01359160, HAL.
    3. César Ducruet & Theo E. Notteboom, 2012. "The worldwide maritime network of container shipping: Spatial structure and regional dynamics," Post-Print halshs-00538051, HAL.
    4. Tiller, Kara Carroll & Thill, Jean-Claude, 2017. "Spatial patterns of landside trade impedance in containerized South American exports," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 272-285.
    5. Shilin Ye & Ziran Jiang, 2021. "Location and spatial dynamics of maritime services: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta, China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 2576-2595, December.
    6. Cahoon, Stephen & Pateman, Hilary & Chen, Shu-Ling, 2013. "Regional port authorities: leading players in innovation networks?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 66-75.
    7. Debrie, Jean & Lavaud-Letilleul, Valérie & Parola, Francesco, 2013. "Shaping port governance: the territorial trajectories of reform," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 56-65.
    8. Notteboom, Theo & De Langen, Peter & Jacobs, Wouter, 2013. "Institutional plasticity and path dependence in seaports: interactions between institutions, port governance reforms and port authority routines," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 26-35.
    9. Stephen J. Ramos, 2021. "Materiality in the Seam Space: Sketches for a Transitional Port City Dome District," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 210-222.
    10. María del Mar Cerbán Jiménez & Juan Ortí Llatas, 2015. "Infraestructuras Portuarias. Análisis del sistema Portuario Espanol Contexto Internacional y propuestas de reforma," Studies on the Spanish Economy eee2015-20, FEDEA.
    11. R. B. Castelein & H. Geerlings & J. H. R. Van Duin, 2019. "The ostensible tension between competition and cooperation in ports: a case study on intra-port competition and inter-organizational relations in the Rotterdam container handling sector," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-25, December.
    12. Jung, Paul H. & Thill, Jean-Claude, 2022. "Sea-land interdependence and delimitation of port hinterland-foreland structures in the international transportation system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    13. Young-Joon Seo & Jin Suk Park, 2018. "The role of seaports in regional employment: evidence from South Korea," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(1), pages 80-92, January.
    14. Wilmsmeier, Gordon & Monios, Jason, 2015. "The production of capitalist “smooth” space in global port operations," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 59-69.
    15. Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Ducruet, César & Jacobs, Wouter & Monios, Jason & Notteboom, Theo & Rodrigue, Jean-Paul & Slack, Brian & Tam, Ka-chai & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2014. "Port geography at the crossroads with human geography: between flows and spaces," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 84-96.
    16. Marcella De Martino, 2015. "L?innovazione collaborativa nei porti: aspetti metodologici ed alcune evidenze empiriche," ECONOMIA E DIRITTO DEL TERZIARIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(1), pages 105-126.
    17. Brinker, Janosch & Haasis, Hans-Dietrich, 2020. "The impact of an asymmetric allocation of power on the digitalization strategy of port logistics," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferen, volume 30, pages 457-484, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    18. González Laxe, Fernando & Jesus Freire Seoane, Maria & Pais Montes, Carlos, 2012. "Maritime degree, centrality and vulnerability: port hierarchies and emerging areas in containerized transport (2008–2010)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 33-44.
    19. Frank Schiller & Alexandra Penn & Angela Druckman & Lauren Basson & Kate Royston, 2014. "Exploring Space, Exploiting Opportunities," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 18(6), pages 792-798, December.
    20. Monios, Jason, 2019. "Polycentric port governance," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 26-36.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:6:y:2021:i:3:p:119-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.