IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v63y2017i11id120-2016-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of the DEA on the performance evaluation of the agricultural support policy in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaolin TANG

    (China Agricultural University, Beijing, China)

  • Jieqiong WANG

    (China Agricultural University, Beijing, China)

  • Biao ZHANG

    (China Agricultural University, Beijing, China)

  • Lingxian ZHANG

Abstract

The paper utilizes the data envelopment analysis (DEA) method based on the OECD policy classification to evaluate the performance of the agricultural support policy at the provincial and agricultural commodity levels from the respective viewpoints of agricultural input and output. The analysis at the provincial level mainly focuses on the similarities and differences in the performance of the agricultural support policies between the primary grain-producing areas and the secondary grain-producing areas; at the agricultural commodity level, 17 representative Chinese agricultural commodities are selected and their performance compared. The results are then used to proffer suggestions for the future agricultural support policy optimization in China. The paper found that 50% of the provinces were DEA-efficient, in general, during the study period due to the low overall province-level scale efficiency. The performance values of the secondary grain-producing areas were significantly lower than those of the primary grain-producing areas due to the overall low scale and technical efficiency values. These results show that the support policies for agricultural commodities in China altogether require a further improvement, mainly due to the low technical efficiency of agricultural commodities.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaolin TANG & Jieqiong WANG & Biao ZHANG & Lingxian ZHANG, 2017. "Application of the DEA on the performance evaluation of the agricultural support policy in China," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(11), pages 510-523.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:63:y:2017:i:11:id:120-2016-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/120/2016-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/120/2016-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/120/2016-AGRICECON.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/120/2016-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vasily Erokhin & Anna Ivolga & Wim Heijman, 2014. "Trade liberalization and state support of agriculture: effects for developing countries," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(11), pages 524-537.
    2. El Benni, Nadja & Finger, Robert, 2013. "The effect of agricultural policy reforms on income inequality in Swiss agriculture - An analysis for valley, hill and mountain regions," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 638-651.
    3. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    4. Shiwei LIU & Pingyu ZHANG & Xiuli HE & Jing LI, 2015. "Efficiency change in North-East China agricultural sector: A DEA approach," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(11), pages 522-532.
    5. Atici, Kazim Baris & Podinovski, Victor V., 2015. "Using data envelopment analysis for the assessment of technical efficiency of units with different specialisations: An application to agriculture," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 72-83.
    6. Jikun Huang & Xiaobing Wang & Huayong Zhi & Zhurong Huang & Scott Rozelle, 2011. "Subsidies and distortions in China’s agriculture: evidence from producer‐level data," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 55(1), pages 53-71, January.
    7. Fisher, Monica & Kandiwa, Vongai, 2014. "Can agricultural input subsidies reduce the gender gap in modern maize adoption? Evidence from Malawi," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 101-111.
    8. Bervejillo, Jose E. & Alston, Julian M. & Tumber, Kabir P., 2012. "The benefits from public agricultural research in Uruguay," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 56(4), pages 1-23, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Flegl & Carlos Alberto Jiménez-Bandala & Isaac Sánchez-Juárez & Edgar Matus, 2022. "Analysis of production and investment efficiency in the Mexican food industry: Application of two-stage DEA," Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 40(2), pages 109-117.
    2. E. ERNAWATI & Raja MASBAR & M. Shabri Abd. MAJID & Abd. JAMAL, 2021. "Production And Marketing Efficiency Of Patchouli Oil Industry In Indonesia," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(2), pages 135-148, June.
    3. Chowdhury, Hedayet & Zelenyuk, Valentin, 2016. "Performance of hospital services in Ontario: DEA with truncated regression approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 111-122.
    4. Jingpeng Chen & Desheng Zhang & Zhi Chen & Zhijian Li & Zigong Cai, 2022. "Effect of Agricultural Social Services on Green Production of Natural Rubber: Evidence from Hainan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Nodin, Mohd Norazmi & Mustafa, Zainol & Hussain, Saiful Izzuan, 2022. "Assessing rice production efficiency for food security policy planning in Malaysia: A non-parametric bootstrap data envelopment analysis approach," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    6. Färe, Rolf & Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Grosskopf, Shawna & Zelenyuk, Valentin, 2016. "Cost decompositions and the efficient subset," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 123-130.
    7. Tao Du, 2017. "Performance Measurement of Healthcare Service and Association Discussion between Quality and Efficiency: Evidence from 31 Provinces of Mainland China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Wen-Min Lu & Qian Long Kweh & Kai-Chu Yang, 2022. "Multiplicative efficiency aggregation to evaluate Taiwanese local auditing institutions performance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1243-1262, August.
    9. Victor V. Podinovski & Robert G. Chambers & Kazim Baris Atici & Iryna D. Deineko, 2016. "Marginal Values and Returns to Scale for Nonparametric Production Frontiers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 236-250, February.
    10. da Silva, Aline Veronese & Costa, Marcelo Azevedo & Lopes, Ana Lúcia Miranda & do Carmo, Gabriela Miranda, 2019. "A close look at second stage data envelopment analysis using compound error models and the Tobit model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 111-126.
    11. Simar, Leopold & Zelenyuk, Valentin, 2018. "Improving Finite Sample Approximation by Central Limit Theorems for DEA and FDH efficiency scores," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2018020, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    12. Podinovski, Victor V., 2017. "Returns to scale in convex production technologies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(3), pages 970-982.
    13. Podinovski, Victor V. & Bouzdine-Chameeva, Tatiana, 2016. "On single-stage DEA models with weight restrictions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 1044-1050.
    14. Alireza Amirteimoori & Biresh K. Sahoo & Saber Mehdizadeh, 2023. "Data envelopment analysis for scale elasticity measurement in the stochastic case: with an application to Indian banking," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-36, December.
    15. Nodin, Mohd Norazmi & Mustafa, Zainol & Hussain, Saiful Izzuan, 2023. "Eco-efficiency assessment of Malaysian rice self-sufficiency approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    16. Jahangoshai Rezaee, Mustafa & Yousefi, Samuel & Hayati, Jamileh, 2019. "Root barriers management in development of renewable energy resources in Iran: An interpretative structural modeling approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 292-306.
    17. Vladimír Holý, 2022. "The impact of operating environment on efficiency of public libraries," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(1), pages 395-414, March.
    18. Somayeh Razipour-GhalehJough & Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi & Gholamreza Jahanshahloo & Mohsen Rostamy-malkhalifeh & Hamid Sharafi, 2020. "Finding closest target for bank branches in the presence of weight restrictions using data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 288(2), pages 755-787, May.
    19. Natthan Singh & Millie Pant & Amit Goel, 2018. "ANN embedded data envelopment analysis approach for measuring the efficiency of state boards in India," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(5), pages 1092-1106, October.
    20. Kadziński, Miłosz & Labijak, Anna & Napieraj, Małgorzata, 2017. "Integrated framework for robustness analysis using ratio-based efficiency model with application to evaluation of Polish airports," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1-18.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:63:y:2017:i:11:id:120-2016-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.