IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jbvela/v10y2015i1p77-97n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public versus Private Market Participants and the Prices Paid for Private Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Covrig Vicentiu
  • McConaughy Daniel L.

    (David Nazarian College of Business and Economics, California State University Northridge, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, CA 91330, USA)

Abstract

This study examines the impact of the market participant on prices paid for private companies in the Pratt’s Stats database. We examine approximately 4,200 transactions over the period of 2000–2011 for companies with sales of $1 million or more. We find that public buyers pay more after controlling for the target’s size, industry, age, estimated growth rate, and profitability, as well as the time of the transaction. We also find that smaller companies and C-corporations sell at higher multiples. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that the price paid for a company is related to whether the market participant is private or public. Further, our results provide additional insights to users of the Pratt’s Stats database regarding the characteristics of the transactions in this well-known and often-used database.

Suggested Citation

  • Covrig Vicentiu & McConaughy Daniel L., 2015. "Public versus Private Market Participants and the Prices Paid for Private Companies," Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 77-97, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jbvela:v:10:y:2015:i:1:p:77-97:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/jbvela-2014-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbvela-2014-0005
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jbvela-2014-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Longstaff, Francis A, 1995. "How Much Can Marketability Affect Security Values?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 50(5), pages 1767-1774, December.
    2. Paglia John K & Harjoto Maretno, 2010. "The Discount for Lack of Marketability in Privately Owned Companies: A Multiples Approach," Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-26, August.
    3. John D. Finnerty, 2013. "The Impact of Stock Transfer Restrictions on the Private Placement Discount," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 42(3), pages 575-609, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Linda H. & Dyl, Edward A. & Jiang, George J. & Juneja, Januj A., 2015. "Risk, illiquidity or marketability: What matters for the discounts on private equity placements?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 41-50.
    2. Abudy, Menachem & Benninga, Simon & Shust, Efrat, 2016. "The cost of equity for private firms," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 431-443.
    3. Christoph Kaserer & Niklas Wagner & Ann-Kristin Achleitner, 2005. "Managing Investment Risks of Institutional Private Equity Investors — The Challenge of Illiquidity," Springer Books, in: Michael Frenkel & Markus Rudolf & Ulrich Hommel (ed.), Risk Management, edition 0, pages 259-277, Springer.
    4. Michael Ewens & Joan Farre-Mensa, 2022. "Private or Public Equity? The Evolving Entrepreneurial Finance Landscape," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 271-293, November.
    5. Michel Dubois & Cem Ertur, 1997. "The cost of equity and exchange listing evidence from the French stock market," Working Papers hal-01527157, HAL.
    6. Awan, Obaid A., 2019. "Price discovery or noise: The role of arbitrage and speculation in explaining crude oil price behaviour," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    7. Xiao-dong Xu & Xia Wang & Yi Jin, 2010. "Releasing of restricted shares, firm quality, and market trading activity," China Finance Review International, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 1(1), pages 78-97, October.
    8. Kusen, Alex & Rudolf, Markus, 2019. "Feedback trading: Strategies during day and night with global interconnectedness," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 438-463.
    9. Ricardo Gonçalves, 2023. "Backward Partial Vertical Integration Through Private Placement," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 101-122, December.
    10. Stephen Bell & Hui Feng, 2009. "Reforming China's Stock Market: Institutional Change Chinese Style," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57(1), pages 117-140, March.
    11. S. G. Kou & Hui Wang, 2004. "Option Pricing Under a Double Exponential Jump Diffusion Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1178-1192, September.
    12. Deuskar, Prachi & Gupta, Anurag & Subrahmanyam, Marti G., 2011. "Liquidity effect in OTC options markets: Premium or discount?," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 127-160, February.
    13. Paglia John K & Harjoto Maretno, 2010. "The Discount for Lack of Marketability in Privately Owned Companies: A Multiples Approach," Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-26, August.
    14. Radosław Pastusiak & Jakub Keller & Michał Radke, 2020. "Marketability Discount in Various Economic Environments. Comparison of Developed and Emerging Markets on the Example of the USA and Poland," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, June.
    15. Kempf, Alexander & Korn, Olaf & Uhrig-Homburg, Marliese, 2012. "The term structure of illiquidity premia," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1381-1391.
    16. Kahl, Matthias & Liu, Jun & Longstaff, Francis A., 2003. "Paper millionaires: how valuable is stock to a stockholder who is restricted from selling it?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 385-410, March.
    17. Abudy, Menachem Meni & Raviv, Alon, 2016. "How much can illiquidity affect corporate debt yield spread?," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 58-69.
    18. Lin, Jing & An, Yunbi & Yang, Jun & Liang, Yinhe, 2019. "Price inversion and post lock-up period returns on private investments in public equity in China: An interest transfer perspective," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 47-84.
    19. Bian, Jiangze & Su, Tie & Wang, Jun, 2022. "Non-marketability and one-day selling lockup," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1-23.
    20. Kun Park & Ward Whitt, 2013. "Continuous-time Markov chain models to estimate the premium for extended hedge fund lockups," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 357-379, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jbvela:v:10:y:2015:i:1:p:77-97:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.