IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/bejeap/vtopics.5y2006i1n24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality and Consumer Choice in Healthcare: Evidence from Kidney Transplantation

Author

Listed:
  • Howard David H

    (Emory University)

Abstract

Most studies of competition in health care focus on prices and costs, but concerns about quality play a central role in policy debates. If demand is inelastic to quality, then competition may reduce patient welfare. This study uses a dataset of patient registrations for kidney transplantation in conjunction with a mixed logit model to gauge consumers’ responsiveness to quality when choosing hospitals. Results indicate that at the hospital level, a one-standard deviation increase in the graft-failure rate is associated with a 6% decline in patient registrations. Privately-insured patients are more responsive to quality than Medicare patients, suggesting that insurers consider quality when contracting with providers.

Suggested Citation

  • Howard David H, 2006. "Quality and Consumer Choice in Healthcare: Evidence from Kidney Transplantation," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-22, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:bejeap:v:topics.5:y:2006:i:1:n:24
    DOI: 10.1515/1538-0653.1349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/1538-0653.1349
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/1538-0653.1349?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joel Smith, "undated". "Technical Working Paper: Creation of the September 2009 Baseline of the 2005 MATH SIPP+ Microsimulation Model and Database," Mathematica Policy Research Reports c2dd86c53a2b4f979e41ac610, Mathematica Policy Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Soroush Saghafian & Wallace J. Hopp, 2020. "Can Public Reporting Cure Healthcare? The Role of Quality Transparency in Improving Patient–Provider Alignment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 71-92, January.
    2. K. John McConnell & Richard C. Lindrooth & Douglas R. Wholey & Thomas M. Maddox & Nick Bloom, 2016. "Modern Management Practices and Hospital Admissions," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(4), pages 470-485, April.
    3. Hendrik Schmitz & Magdalena A. Stroka‐Wetsch, 2020. "Determinants of nursing home choice: Does reported quality matter?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(7), pages 766-777, July.
    4. Saghafian, Soroush & Hopp, Wallace J., 2017. "Can Public Reporting Cure Healthcare? The Role of Quality Transparency in Improving Patient-Provider Alignment," Working Paper Series rwp17-044, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    5. Varkevisser, Marco & van der Geest, Stéphanie A. & Schut, Frederik T., 2012. "Do patients choose hospitals with high quality ratings? Empirical evidence from the market for angioplasty in the Netherlands," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 371-378.
    6. Rita Ginja & Julie Riise & Barton Willage & Alexander L.P. Willén, 2022. "Does Your Doctor Matter? Doctor Quality and Patient Outcomes," CESifo Working Paper Series 9788, CESifo.
    7. Schmitz, Hendrik & Stroka, Magdalena A., 2014. "Do Elderly Choose Nursing Homes by Quality, Price or Location?," Ruhr Economic Papers 495, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    8. Guccio, Calogero & Lisi, Domenico & Pignataro, Giacomo, 2014. "Readmission and Hospital Quality under Prospective Payment System," MPRA Paper 56490, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Xinyu Li & Christian Waibel, 2021. "Patients' free choice of physicians is not always good," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(11), pages 2751-2765, November.
    10. repec:zbw:rwirep:0495 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Rubino, Claudio & Di Maria, Chiara & Abbruzzo, Antonino & Ferrante, Mauro, 2022. "Socio-economic inequality, interregional mobility and mortality among cancer patients: A mediation analysis approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    12. Hendrik Schmitz & Magdalena Stroka, 2014. "Do Elderly Choose Nursing Homes by Quality, Price or Location?," Ruhr Economic Papers 0495, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universität Dortmund, Universität Duisburg-Essen.
    13. Calogero Guccio & Domenico Lisi & Giacomo Pignataro, 2016. "Readmission and Hospital Quality under Different Payment Regimes," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 72(4), pages 453-474, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ranjan Priya & Bakshi Baishali, 2006. "Corruption, Environmental Resources, and International Trade," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-30, September.
    2. Nicoletti Cheti & Ermisch John F, 2008. "Intergenerational Earnings Mobility: Changes across Cohorts in Britain," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 1-38, January.
    3. Alamar Benjamin, 2005. "A First Step," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-5, October.
    4. Grepperud Sverre, 2007. "Optimal Prevention when Informal Penalties Matter: The Case of Medical Errors," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-30, August.
    5. Blanchard Emily J, 2007. "Foreign Direct Investment, Endogenous Tariffs, and Preferential Trade Agreements," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-52, November.
    6. Caulkins Jonathan P & Reuter Peter & Taylor Lowell J, 2006. "Can Supply Restrictions Lower Price? Violence, Drug Dealing and Positional Advantage," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Shelburne Robert C. & Palacin Jose, 2006. "Is There an East European Housing Bubble?," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 6(3), pages 1-39, September.
    8. Mocetti Sauro, 2007. "Intergenerational Earnings Mobility in Italy," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 1-25, December.
    9. Das Dilip K., 2006. "Globalization in the World of Finance: An Analytical History," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-25, February.
    10. Boulier Bryan L. & Datta Tejwant S. & Goldfarb Robert S, 2007. "Vaccination Externalities," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, May.
    11. Jabara Cathy, 2005. "Commentary: The United States, Agriculture, and the Doha Round of Negotiations," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 5(4), pages 1-8, December.
    12. Blommestein Hans J & Santiso Javier, 2007. "New Strategies for Emerging Domestic Sovereign Bond Markets in the Global Financial Landscape," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 1-58, June.
    13. Ng Irene, 2007. "Intergenerational Income Mobility in Singapore," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 1-35, October.
    14. De Santis Roberta & Vicarelli Claudio, 2007. "The ``Deeper" and the ``Wider" EU Strategies of Trade Integration: An Empirical Evaluation of EU Common Commercial Policy Effects," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 7(4), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Anand Alok & Mittelhammer Ron C & McCluskey Jill J, 2007. "Consumer Response to Information and Second-Generation Genetically Modified Food in India," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-20, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:bejeap:v:topics.5:y:2006:i:1:n:24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.