IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssb/v84y2022i5p1589-1607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling the COVID‐19 infection trajectory: A piecewise linear quantile trend model

Author

Listed:
  • Feiyu Jiang
  • Zifeng Zhao
  • Xiaofeng Shao

Abstract

We propose a piecewise linear quantile trend model to analyse the trajectory of the COVID‐19 daily new cases (i.e. the infection curve) simultaneously across multiple quantiles. The model is intuitive, interpretable and naturally captures the phase transitions of the epidemic growth rate via change‐points. Unlike the mean trend model and least squares estimation, our quantile‐based approach is robust to outliers, captures heteroscedasticity (commonly exhibited by COVID‐19 infection curves) and automatically delivers both point and interval forecasts with minimal assumptions. Building on a self‐normalized (SN) test statistic, this paper proposes a novel segmentation algorithm for multiple change‐point estimation. Theoretical guarantees such as segmentation consistency are established under mild and verifiable assumptions. Using the proposed method, we analyse the COVID‐19 infection curves in 35 major countries and discover patterns with potentially relevant implications for effectiveness of the pandemic responses by different countries. A simple change‐adaptive two‐stage forecasting scheme is further designed to generate short‐term prediction of COVID‐19 cumulative new cases and is shown to deliver accurate forecast valuable to public health decision‐making.

Suggested Citation

  • Feiyu Jiang & Zifeng Zhao & Xiaofeng Shao, 2022. "Modelling the COVID‐19 infection trajectory: A piecewise linear quantile trend model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(5), pages 1589-1607, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:84:y:2022:i:5:p:1589-1607
    DOI: 10.1111/rssb.12453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssb.12453
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssb.12453?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chun Yip Yau & Zifeng Zhao, 2016. "Inference for multiple change points in time series via likelihood ratio scan statistics," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(4), pages 895-916, September.
    2. Alexander Aue & Lajos Horváth, 2013. "Structural breaks in time series," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Alexander Aue & Rex C. Y. Cheung & Thomas C. M. Lee & Ming Zhong, 2014. "Segmented Model Selection in Quantile Regression Using the Minimum Description Length Principle," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(507), pages 1241-1256, September.
    4. Howard D. Bondell & Brian J. Reich & Huixia Wang, 2010. "Noncrossing quantile regression curve estimation," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 97(4), pages 825-838.
    5. Pesaran, M. Hashem & Timmermann, Allan, 2002. "Market timing and return prediction under model instability," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 9(5), pages 495-510, December.
    6. Luc Bauwens & Gary Koop & Dimitris Korobilis & Jeroen V.K. Rombouts, 2015. "The Contribution of Structural Break Models to Forecasting Macroeconomic Series," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 596-620, June.
    7. Luc Bauwens & Gary Koop & Dimitris Korobilis & Jeroen V.K. Rombouts, 2015. "The Contribution of Structural Break Models to Forecasting Macroeconomic Series," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 596-620, June.
    8. Andrews, Donald W K, 1993. "Tests for Parameter Instability and Structural Change with Unknown Change Point," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 821-856, July.
    9. Oka, Tatsushi & Qu, Zhongjun, 2011. "Estimating structural changes in regression quantiles," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 162(2), pages 248-267, June.
    10. Eun Ryung Lee & Hohsuk Noh & Byeong U. Park, 2014. "Model Selection via Bayesian Information Criterion for Quantile Regression Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(505), pages 216-229, March.
    11. Zhou Zhou & Xiaofeng Shao, 2013. "Inference for linear models with dependent errors," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(2), pages 323-343, March.
    12. Jushan Bai & Pierre Perron, 2003. "Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(1), pages 1-22.
    13. Shao, Xiaofeng & Zhang, Xianyang, 2010. "Testing for Change Points in Time Series," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 105(491), pages 1228-1240.
    14. Yeonwoo Rho & Xiaofeng Shao, 2015. "Inference for Time Series Regression Models With Weakly Dependent and Heteroscedastic Errors," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 444-457, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiang, Feiyu & Zhao, Zifeng & Shao, Xiaofeng, 2023. "Time series analysis of COVID-19 infection curve: A change-point perspective," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 232(1), pages 1-17.
    2. Zifeng Zhao & Feiyu Jiang & Xiaofeng Shao, 2022. "Segmenting time series via self‐normalisation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(5), pages 1699-1725, November.
    3. Rossi, Barbara, 2013. "Advances in Forecasting under Instability," Handbook of Economic Forecasting, in: G. Elliott & C. Granger & A. Timmermann (ed.), Handbook of Economic Forecasting, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1203-1324, Elsevier.
    4. Alessandro Casini & Pierre Perron, 2018. "Structural Breaks in Time Series," Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series WP2019-02, Boston University - Department of Economics.
    5. Dufays, Arnaud & Rombouts, Jeroen V.K., 2020. "Relevant parameter changes in structural break models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 217(1), pages 46-78.
    6. Ardia, David & Dufays, Arnaud & Ordás Criado, Carlos, 2023. "Linking Frequentist and Bayesian Change-Point Methods," MPRA Paper 119486, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Venkata Jandhyala & Stergios Fotopoulos & Ian MacNeill & Pengyu Liu, 2013. "Inference for single and multiple change-points in time series," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 423-446, July.
    8. Czinkota, Thomas, 2012. "Das Halteproblem bei Strukturbrüchen in Finanzmarktzeitreihen [The Halting Problem applied to Structural Breaks in Financial Time Series]," MPRA Paper 37072, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Ryan Compton & Syeed Khan, 2010. "An examination of the stability of short-run Canadian stock predictability," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 30(2), pages 1293-1306.
    10. Agata Lozinskaia & Anastasiia Saltykova, 2019. "Fundamental Factors Affecting The Moex Russia Index: Structural Break Detection In A Long-Term Time Series," HSE Working papers WP BRP 77/FE/2019, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    11. Ngai Hang Chan & Chun Yip Yau & Rong-Mao Zhang, 2014. "Group LASSO for Structural Break Time Series," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(506), pages 590-599, June.
    12. Oka, Tatsushi & Perron, Pierre, 2018. "Testing for common breaks in a multiple equations system," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 204(1), pages 66-85.
    13. Geweke, John & Jiang, Yu, 2011. "Inference and prediction in a multiple-structural-break model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 163(2), pages 172-185, August.
    14. C. Y. Tan & Y. B. Koh & K. H. Ng & K. H. Ng, 2019. "Structural Change Analysis of Active Cryptocurrency Market," Papers 1909.10679, arXiv.org.
    15. Bauwens, Luc & De Backer, Bruno & Dufays, Arnaud, 2014. "A Bayesian method of change-point estimation with recurrent regimes: Application to GARCH models," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 207-229.
    16. Pesaran, M. Hashem & Timmermann, Allan, 2004. "How costly is it to ignore breaks when forecasting the direction of a time series?," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 411-425.
    17. Todd E. Clark & Michael W. McCracken, 2009. "Improving Forecast Accuracy By Combining Recursive And Rolling Forecasts," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 50(2), pages 363-395, May.
    18. Jiawen Xu & Pierre Perron, 2023. "Forecasting in the presence of in-sample and out-of-sample breaks," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(6), pages 3001-3035, June.
    19. Cho, Haeran & Fryzlewicz, Piotr, 2023. "Multiple change point detection under serial dependence: wild contrast maximisation and gappy Schwarz algorithm," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120085, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Tae‐Hwy Lee & Shahnaz Parsaeian & Aman Ullah, 2022. "Optimal forecast under structural breaks," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(5), pages 965-987, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:84:y:2022:i:5:p:1589-1607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.